• leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s been a long time since I looked but I hope most cars still have physical buttons/controls for all important functions! Besides being easier and faster to use, without them if a touchscreen malfunctions (hardware or software) everything is gone and you wouldn’t be able to drive the car. Then there’s the tracking and spying, and sometimes bugs and UI changes after updates–and now ads!?# Cars are becoming as enshittified like everything else now.

    • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It wasn’t dumb from corporate perspective, which is why they all gobbled it up like junky hoovering on piles of white dust.

      You know how expensive it is to mold unique dedicated physical buttons for every function and then wire them all over the place? Or just slap single touch display and cram all the shit into that single display. You code it once and use it on all models. Corporates were already counting the money saved there. Until it backfired because everyone hated it, reviewers criticized it and now it’s finally also criticized by safety agencies.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You know how expensive it is to mold unique dedicated physical buttons for every function and then wire them all over the place?

        Not expensive. You don’t have to “wire them all over the place”, you just put them on a PCB and connect them to the nearest CAN bus, or similar.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          They’d basically already be doing that for the touch screen, and may well be using similar controls under the hood, where the physical buttons send a command to the computer to do a thing, in lieu of a mechanical connection.

        • riodoro1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          One more connector, one more cable in harness, more coding, more cad time, more manufacturing time and more testing.

          If it comes out to 20 dollars per car and you multiply it by 50000 a year for a relatively popular model there is a nice bonus for the ceo. Oh, and the price to consumer increases at the same time.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            More coding?! Are you serious? Over a touch screen!

            Also, extremely easy to test.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            If it comes out to 20 dollars per car and you multiply it by 50000 a year for a relatively popular model there is a nice bonus for the ceo.

            Or you could just raise the price of the car by $20 since you’ve just added thousands in value?

            I mean shit, let’s take the seats out of the car! Bam! Just saved you billions, right? /s

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        As well as the pure cost saving there was also the notion that it was a futuristic look that would sell, and so boost profits that way, too.

        And probably it did sell and market well - for a while.

        I feel that consumers had become too trusting of carmakers - after all, cars have been getting better and better in terms of their usability for decades, so when carmakers went touchscreen everything, the first instinct of the average consumer would be to trust it and assume it represented an improvement.“They wouldn’t do it if it was worse, right?”

        And so people buy the fancy futuristic car with no buttons, and only after driving it for a month does it sink in how much they truly hate it, and that they got sold a lie.

        So there was always going to be that one generation of touchscreen-everything, before the people who got burnt by it are now the ones thinking “I won’t buy anything again that doesn’t have some buttons!”

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Without actually knowing how much constructing the physical buttons cost, I would guess that the real savings are in process optimization - if all you have for the interface is a screen, then you don’t need to have the interface design done before constructing the car - you can parallelize these tasks.

        Insufficient as far as justifications go, but understandably lucrative.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        sure, but they could have programmed a stick with haptic feedback to help navigate the screen so you can navigate radio, gps, contacts or whatever else while driving. Slower than touching or the old buttons but as safe as old buttons.

        • njordomir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          This is probably not a universal experience, but buttons are often faster. Not a car example, but my Garmin Venu watch was a touchscreen and it sucked compared to my Garmin Fenix which is 100% button controlled. I also type way faster on a tactile thumb board than an on screen keyboard.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Hyundai (motor group) and some time later VW group announced that they are bringing physical buttons back.

      March of 2023

      As it turns out though, sometimes the old ways are best. Hyundai certainly thinks so, as it has pledged to employ real physical buttons in products to come.

      https://www.thedrive.com/news/hyundai-promises-to-keep-buttons-in-cars-because-touchscreen-controls-are-dangerous

      December of 2023

      https://insideevs.com/news/701296/vw-physical-controls-to-return/

  • Leeuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Not sure how they were able to remove so many buttons in the first place and not be marked down on safety. Suddenly trying to find a demister on a touchscreen menu while in motion was never a great idea. Surprisingly, Volvo off all companies have been one of the worst for this. That’s why I like Dacias, little tech = little to go wrong.

  • johannessmits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Too bad, i liked the way it was going… in my experience 80% of the buttons are unnecessary, provided of course that the automation is well thought out .

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now, take out the bullshit that’s tracking you and sending the information back to them to sell, and we’ll be doing something great

    • johannessmits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I have now a tucson and I can tell you with all the stupid an superfluous buttons everywhere that I need te press each time I start the car it is definitely not adding tot the security on the road.

      • FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So, you’re saying that a touchscreen where you have actively look at because you don’t have any haptic feedback is saver on the roads?

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        My uncle’s outback looks like a video slot machine, and everything had to be done through the touchscreen. But to add insult to injury, the Subaru touchscreens are super slow and unresponsive, so they feel like they aren’t working.

      • Addv4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep. And mazda has physical climate button/knobs, with a physical dial to control the infotainment (it’s pretty convenient, if a bit of an older design on most of their vehicles).

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Same as BMW iDrive. I’m sure some are touch screen, but you don’t have to use it.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Mazda is a physical dial by default, but if you want to you can go into the settings and enable the touch screen. Best of both worlds.

        • njordomir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I consider it space-age. I haven’t driven a non-Mazda that seemed as well thought out and functional. I wish I could rip one out and put it on my non-Mazda car. I breath a sigh of relief that my partner didn’t buy the Honda with a long finicky touchstrip to control the volume instead of a knob.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I got in right before Subaru went that way and ended up with the best of both worlds: a touchscreen for CarPlay and knobs for…everything else. I still have knobs for the radio if need be.

        Plus it’s a six speed manual (Crosstrek).

        I get a flyer from the dealership every other week asking if I want to “upgrade.” Sorry, fellas, nothing you have is an upgrade to me. You can’t get a manual gearbox here any more.

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You can’t get a manual gearbox here any more.

          Huh, let’s see why

          Another factor contributing to the discontinuation of manual transmissions is the increasing emphasis on safety features and the integration of advanced driver-assist technologies.

          Ew.

          • garretble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It’s frustrating because “the consumer” doesn’t want manuals, yet car makers add all these things that keep people from paying attention to the road making it - in my opinion - too easy to get distracted. I like that I can’t hold my phone in my hand and drive because I need to shift.

            Last summer I was in Ireland, and I was peeking in a few cars on parked on the side of the road just out of curiosity. Almost every one was a manual, it seemed like. It’s not that we COULDN’T have fun, manual cars here. But Americans are lazy.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I have a Hyundai ioniq 5 and it definitely has touch buttons for some of the things, like climate control.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve never had this problem because I’m too poor to afford a car new enough to not have any buttons lmao

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s me as well. We have two cars, and both are old enough to drive. We need to replace them, but I’m holding out as long as I can.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same, I’m hoping “ol’ reliable” will last another 200k-500k miles so I won’t have to decide if I want to ride around in a privacy invading, poorly designed smart automobile, or if I’d rather just ride my bike everywhere. To be fair, my car is only around a decade old, but it’s old enough to be missing most of the smart tech, and none of the car’s functions tie in with the stereo.

      • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Definitely set aside a repair fund and watch YouTube videos on how to do maintenance and common repairs on your vehicle. If its Japanese, the motor and transmission should hold on. But you’ll need brake rotors/pads, tie rods ends, struts, stabilizer links, etc. along the way. Its way cheaper if you buy your own parts and do it yourself. Good luck keeping your ol’ reliable going!

  • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not out of the goodness of their own hearts mind. It’s probably more because Euro NCAP are going to be deducting score for not having physical essentials in 2026.

  • yarn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thank you!

    I don’t care what the reasoning is behind the decision (customer feedback vs. changes to safety ratings), I’m just glad it’s happening and I hope all manufacturers follow suit.

    This has been my gripe with new cars ever since I found myself needing one in 2022. Everything I looked at had a huge infotainment system front-ending climate and cabin controls. Want to turn your steering wheel heat off mid drive? Ha! Tap this specific spot on this screen 3 times and hope the car doesn’t bounce while you’re doing so or you’ll accidentally turn something else on. Want to use voice controls? Joke’s on you, they only work 50% of the time.

    God forbid something happens to the control board (which costs thousands of dollars to replace if you’re outside warranty), because then you’re completely hosed.

    You know what always worked without fail? The buttons in my 2005 Corolla.

  • JazzlikeDiamond558@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I literally did not buy/straightout refused to buy new Golf because of this crap. It does not get simpler than that: other producer got my money, VW group did not. Period.

    Volkswagen should be forbidden to produce anything. There were even touch-SLIDE commands on the steering wheel. God only knows how many lives were lost in accidents, because someone ‘‘touched’’ something and switched something off or on. Horrible.

  • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hopefully they can hit some middleground so we don’t end up back in the crazy button-hell that cars used to be. Having a billion buttons is equally as bad as having none.