• vatlark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m sure Netanyahu also wants it to end right after he gets his sadistic goals.

    As of mid 2024 the lowest estimate I found was >7000 Palestinian children dead, as compared to a highest estimate of <100 Israeli children dead. Any child dead is too many but it shows that this is not a war, it’s a slaughter.

    I voted for Harris because any alternative is asinine, but we should expect that the arms shipments to Israel will continue unless we pressure our politicians.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump would do the same thing but in his case it means letting Bibi level Gaza and then buying some land to build a tacky resort on it.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It won him some Muslim voters though. Yesterday, I saw one interviewed on TV, paraphrasing: “He withdrew troops from Afghanistan, started no wars and promised to end the war in Gaza.”

      Is it stupid? Yes. Is it what a potentially tipping demographics thinks? Yes.

      Source:

  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Step 1: FOLLOW US LAW AND STOP GIVING THEM WEAPONS

    Let’s see if she ever gets this far. I am not holding my breath

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Which isn’t much, congress controls the money and military aid given. Outside of joining the war and placing our military where IDF is and seeing if that will end war crimes, there’s not a lot on the table and Bibi isn’t going to take a single threat seriously, he knows the US is chained to Isreal with millions and millions of dollars in lobbying.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can’t remember at the moment what it’s called, but there’s a law making it illegal for the US to support war crimes. If the president ceased aid to Israel on those grounds, congress would have to be unusually united to override it. Not saying it couldn’t happen, but it’d be a difficult fight to pick when Israel is being so brazenly genocidal.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Can’t remember at the moment what it’s called, but there’s a law making it illegal for the US to support war crimes.

        The Leahy Law.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Zionism is an ongoing war crime that’s around 100 years old.

      There are no troops that will stop it by watching.

  • RalphFurley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    We’re not in a vacuum. Two things can be true. She can honestly be pro Israel but also hope the turds that are the Likud Party lose power, work to end the genocide, and find a two-state solution - that is, if Hamas and Bibi will allow it, which they won’t.

    This binary all-or-nothing, zero sum bs is just toxic and ignorant.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      She can honestly be pro Israel but also hope the turds that are the Likud Party lose

      I’m not invested in the Likud Party losing if the war continues to expand and drag on.

      The issue isn’t with her “pro-Israel” policy, it’s with her “pro-Genocide” policy. That’s what’s driving the protests.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          “Hey, i have murdered some 40.000 people, most women and children. Can you send me more weapons?”

          “Well sure, here ya go. Need any more troops deployed with it, so no one in the region can try to stop you?”

          More clear of an endorsement isn’t possible aside from going there personally to murder the women and children herself.

          • JonEFive@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            But the question remains, will things be better, worse, or the same under Trump?

            Like it or not, at this stage of the game there are effectively two candidates. To paraphrase South Park, you can vote for the douche bag or the turd sandwich. Neither is a very good option but one is certainly worse than the other if you’re paying any attention at all. Abstaining from voting for Harris in a swing state is tantamount to a half vote for Trump.

            So sure, continue letting everyone know what the current administration is doing wrong. I’m all for valid criticism of our government. Post facts, link sources, and post ways that people can voice their displeasure to their elected officials.

            Trying to sway votes away from Harris is not the answer. Because again, like it or not, the shitty choice that we’ve been handed in this scenario is bad or worse. Please stop advocating for worse.

            • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Left-wing accelerationists will always vote for the worse result, because they’re convinced the only route to the world they want requires burning society down. That Queer and PoC communities will be exterminated in the process is of no concern to them, because they don’t actually care about real human outcomes, they just want their fantasy Communist society to emerge from the ashes of fascism’s cremated victims.

              They literally think that letting Fascism win and destroy society will open the door to a communist revolution. At best they are stupid, at worst they are malicious and explicitly want Fascism. Regardless, they are enemies of progress, friends to Fascists and Christian Nationalists, and have no problem throwing marginalized people to the wolves in a bid to accomplish nothing.

              • JonEFive@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t even know how to respond to this. It’s filled with so much hyperbole that there’s nothing factual to refute or discuss. All I can say is that I vehemently disagree with your opinions on the matter.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        it’s with her “pro-Genocide” policy

        What pro-genocide policy? Name one Kamala Harris, pro-genocide policy.

        Because it seems to me that she just stated that her goal is to end the genocide. Seems like a pretty counterintuitive way to be “pro-genocide”…

        And if you knew anything about politics in Israel, then you would 100% be invested in the Likud Party losing.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sending weapons to the army committing the genocide is a very clear endorsement of it. Judge politicians by their actions, not by their promises.

          And not only was sending those weapons a clear endorsement of the genocide, it is illegal by US law. The whole administration and majority of congress should be under investigation and in jail.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            And who is the current President of the United States?

            Is it Kamala Harris? No?

            So my question stands: one “pro-genocide policy”

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Who is current vice-president?

              Her entire campaign was based on the fact that she is the continuation of Biden. Having proper primaries after Biden dropped out was argued against, saying she is already on the ticket. Her team is largely Bidens team. Distancing her from the administration she currently serves in and saying she is the continuation of that doesn’t work.

              Frankly if she was opposed to genocide the only decent thing would have been to resign from her position in the current administration. You cannot be against genocide while serving a genocidal president.

              • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                Then stop serving Trump. You can’t be against any of the things he stands for, including genocide, if you’re trying to swing this election in his favor.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah im sure you’ll condemn netanyahu as a dictator with an illegitimate claim to power. Im SURE you’ll stop selling billions of dollars in weaponry to them. Seriously though, vote Harris

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Apparently no one in the comments has been paying attention. She’s been saying these same lines about Gaza since the convention speech.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s been a lot of FUD about it and .ml has been running wild denying anything even remotely pro peace from her.

      At any rate literally all we need at this point is a president that tells Netanyahu he either accepts a negotiated return of remaining hostages and withdraws or he loses our weapons support.

      But Biden is also doing his best to pump up their ammo supply so the next president actually doesn’t have the influence Biden could have had. It’s 2024 and I’m ashamed we didn’t learn from supporting South Africa and Iran into the flames. They’ve been shamelessly giving Israel our best military technology with no regard to their political situation. College students called this as the most likely path 2 decades ago, and here we are appearing to be caught by surprise.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Fun fact, there’s a 2008 law that specifically forces the president to give Israel all the best military hardware.

        It was passed by W on his way out the door, and due to the Democratic party being compromised as hell, there’s never been enough votes to get rid of it, and any time the president might want to hold things back, they get sued under that law.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          PDF warning but anyone wanting to peep the law - it’s here.

          https://www.congress.gov/112/statute/STATUTE-126/STATUTE-126-Pg1146.pdf

          There’s actually very explicit language that Congress wrote into the law basically ensuring the president, or the executive at large, has to support Israel militarily.

          So there isn’t really an easy way for a president to unilaterally untangle us from our military alliance with Israel even if they want to. It will take a literal act of Congress to change the course of the State Dept when it comes to Israel as a lot of what is wrong is prescribed by law as necessary.

        • nednobbins@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fun fact, there’s a 2008

          What law is that? I keep hearing about it but I can’t find that law.

          I did find several that prohibit the US from providing aid to countries that commit human rights violations but nothing that requires the US to give anyone any military hardware.

          • LePoisson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            PDF warning but anyone wanting to peep the law - it’s here.

            https://www.congress.gov/112/statute/STATUTE-126/STATUTE-126-Pg1146.pdf

            There’s actually very explicit language that Congress wrote into the law basically ensuring the president, or the executive at large, has to support Israel militarily.

            So there isn’t really an easy way for a president to unilaterally untangle us from our military alliance with Israel even if they want to. It will take a literal act of Congress to change the course of the State Dept when it comes to Israel as a lot of what is wrong is prescribed by law as necessary.

            • nednobbins@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I just read that law and it’s far from clear that it requires any aid to Israel at all.

              Section 1 just defines the title.
              Section 2 provides a statement of findings.
              Section 3 covers US policy towards Israel. This is the closest I could find to something requiring assistance. Policy statements don’t bind the president. At best they serve as guidelines for future legislation.
              Section 4 talks about actively defending Israel but brackets the whole thing in “should”. That has a specific legal definition that includes, “but it’s not required.”
              Section 5 simply extends some deadlines that were going to expire.
              Section 6 mandates some reports.
              Section 7 defines terms.

              The language in the Leahy Act is considerably stronger and more explicit. “No assistance shall be furnished under this chapter…”

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Biden and Obama both could have used the leahy law on day one. We have evidence going that far back that Israel systematically commits war crimes, including occupying Palestine in an illegal manner. To be clear there is a way they could have done it legally. But things including extending their own, civilian, legal system into the occupied areas preclude it being legal.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s 2024 and I’m ashamed we didn’t learn from supporting South Africa and Iran into the flames.

        We did learn. Just all the wrong lessons. Iran taught us that you can ride a wave of hate for 50 years. South Africa taught us that you crack down on the BDS movement day one and keep the media on lock for your Apartheid friends.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Literal last minute shilling bruh

    If she had said this once like even 2 weeks ago, people might have actually listened

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Finally some positive words now for acting on it, if she gets a chance.

    In a presidential democracy she has all the power if she wants it.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Seems a little too little too late for it to move the needle much, especially given how much early voting has happened. Harris’s position on Israel has been so bizarre, pretty sure Israel has even been actively working against Democrats this whole time anyways.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Way to late and it’s ridiculous she waited till desperation to take a good stance.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Peace has always been her call. We have yet to see how she would work for it because she isn’t in the hot seat yet. We have a choice between someone calling for peace, but not really pro Palestinian, and someone calling for ultra death squads.

        Grow up.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          With early voting and the roar of everything this is too late to make a huge wave difference I think.

          What’s up with the grow up comment. I’m just talking about the strategy being ineffective. It’s completely random.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because your comment reads like the standard .ml stuff trying to tie her to Netanyahu no matter what she says.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              There is somehow always a moving Boogeyman in here.

              And yet it’s everyone else that has to grow up.

              • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I was told to grow up the other day for simply pointing out why Muslim/Arab voters may be struggling internally with voting for Harris. Just, y’know, applying empathy and putting myself into someone’s shoes who has way more involved in that than I do.

                When I pointed out that this is why Democrats lose voters (they’re condescending and dismissive to their own party because their issues/concerns aren’t “convenient” right now) I’m screamed at for supporting Trump and how much worse it would be.

                100,000 voters cast protest votes during the primaries in just Michigan alone over the Palestinian genocide, it’s clearly an important issue to your constituents and they deserve to be treated with respect. Not condescension and insults, as if they can’t possibly comprehend their choices here.

                • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  If Trump wins, don’t look to the liberals you hate to swing Trump to the left on this one. Eventually, under Christian Nationalism & Fascism, there won’t be any Palestinians or their supporters left, so I guess it’s a self-resolving issue.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s basically the same pattern Biden followed. Even when he did fits and starts of good things, it was way too late and only felt like he was doing it for political reasons, not because he had a change of heart.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Biden very clearly was saying things to try and keep a lid on domestic unrest. He literally parroted, (and still does) whatever Netanyahu says. Then he always blames Hamas for Netanyahu tossing in a known deal breaker at the last minute, (occupation of Gaza), even though Biden said he doesn’t want that either.

          Biden’s entire conduct over Israel has been in bad faith.

          Harris could not possibly have the same line as Biden so far because she doesn’t have control over weapons shipments or negotiations. All she can do is call for peace, and yeah those calls get tainted when your boss is saying the exact same stuff in bad faith. But if we aren’t smart enough to realize she cannot possibly be operating in bad faith at his level until January 20th, then we deserve everything we get.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you just had said that two months ago, it would have saved me so mando idiotic conversations…