• 2 Posts
  • 6.36K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle

  • There’s a whole sea of white people who don’t feel impacted by his social policies and don’t understand how his economic policies hurt them. So they don’t actually see a reason not to entertain the idea and make a comparison.

    I’m both shamed and pissed that this race is this close. Shamed because I thought Americans had better critical thinking skills and pissed because our media refuses to explain the problems with Trump.




  • Yeah well there’s no accounting for them being too dumb to remember they passed the War Powers Act specifically to prevent the President from conducting war without a declaration. And that they specifically voted for the AUMFs as designated by the War Powers Act.

    It’s literally the vehicle by which they exercise that constitutional power. Of course they would then have to admit they declared official war on the concept of terrorism.

    The first paragraph makes that pretty clear, but they added two more just to make it crystal clear.

    It is the purpose of this chapter to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

    Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

    The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

    Click here for the actual text of the law.

    Edit - I just went ahead and added them. I am so tired of this purely semantic argument meant to make the US look worse than it is.










  • Oh I have. I used to ride motorcycles and there’s no better way to feel out those roads, I’ve been off-road too.

    But the reality is it is the main form of transportation and it is not optional for most Americans. Which means we have a duty to make it as safe as possible. Yeah that also means boring. We’ve largely let capitalism and personal preference rule the day and motor vehicle accidents are the largest non-disease cause of death because of it.

    And before anyone gets all up in arms about the every day person knowing a ton of regulations, this should all be taken care of on the manufacturer and seller side of things. The size requirements for commercial licenses should come right down to invalidating future purchases of giant pickup trucks, you know the ones, so big they can’t park properly and an M1A2 tank has better visibility. Speed governors should prevent going over 80mph. Headlights should have a max capacity and a thermal camera should be standard to make night driving clear as day.

    But the biggest thing by far is we need to make a project of mass transit such that driving becomes a profession and a hobby, not the main means of transportation. If we can get commuters and road trippers off the road then motor vehicle accident deaths will fall dramatically.


  • Maggoty@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldThere you go little guy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Well there’s three ways to fix that. A state max over which it’s a criminal offense and you go away in handcuffs. A sliding fine that hits for percentage of income. And making all of the penalties criminal. Make it an actual crime for which you have to be taken to jail, booked, and arraigned. Make sure to write in language extending the liability to employers for chauffeurs.


  • Maggoty@lemmy.worldtoMemes@sopuli.xyzStress is relative
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Uhhhh no. From someone who’s been mortared in the Hesco barriers, that’s not how that works. Stress stacks, and that was obviously the last straw. So what else is going on in their life? Do they have an anxiety condition that needs treatment? Do they deal with a boss that gaslights and threatens them? Did they have a car accident recently?

    Unless you know their life intimately you don’t judge.


  • That’s because eons ago a judge determined the error rate for speedometers and radar guns was around 10 mph and we couldn’t punish people for something they don’t realize they’re doing.

    Completely rushing past the fact that not realizing your speed is itself a giant red flag.

    And that has absolutely contributed to the sense of entitlement to speed.


  • Maggoty@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldThere you go little guy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    We can’t do that for most of the roads. We really do just need more traffic cops, tougher penalties, and more cameras. Part of the reason people speed is because getting caught is like getting struck by lightning. I’ve seen people do 80 right by a cop and the cop doesn’t stop them. The level of enforcement is not commensurate with the safety risk.