• 70 Posts
  • 5.52K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle




  • Nobody in the US ever intended to drive all the Iraqi people out

    De-Ba’athification was intended to remove Iraqis from positions of power. And, to a certain extent, whole populations in the Sunni Triangle were being forced off the most valuable plots of oil producing territory.

    Similarly, in Afghanistan, Americans built up these Green Zone territories where native Afghans were not welcome.

    We never got to the point where we could just start homesteading enormous tracks of territory for European or American migrants. But that wasn’t for lack of trying. It was because civilians weren’t desperate enough to try and stake claims in the middle of an active insurgency.

    That kind of ethnic cleansing is clearly Israel’s intent

    Israel is much smaller than Iraq. And they have a large community of settlers ready to risk their lives for a piece of someone else’s land. Even then, it has taken them decades to reach this point.

    You can find large American expat communities in Mexico, Japan, Germany, Korea, Honduras and El Salvador… Anywhere we’ve sent soldiers in the last century really.

    The Israelis just happen to be more genocidal than our proxies in Okanawa or Taipei


  • How is tribal level homophobia and contract based marriage a new idea to Abrahamic religions?

    Just for starters, bronze age shepherds weren’t literate. They certainly weren’t well versed in the ideological basis for fearing homosexuality.

    Also, you could see the strong social trends in the region - Greece, Masadonia, Egypt, Persia - all has accommodating (if not outright misogynist) attitudes. The modern Abrahamiv faiths simply don’t like to acknowledge how gay the Leviant used to be.

    It was pretty hard to be “industrial” at much of anything many hundreds of years ago

    Institutional, then. But I think we get fixated on Victorian Era and onward, while forgetting we’ve had a lot of social development leading up to that moment.

    It’s not a progressive or regressive country because of its age. Regressive waves happen, too, and can reform a host of customs and policies that were far more liberal (or simply alien enough to appear liberal by coincidence).

    New Things are not inherently more progressive things. Just ask the Russians or the Ugandans or the ex-Scientologists.






  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldThere you go little guy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Speed traps are just a tool to further monetize and rent seek car culture in the absence of public transit.

    You can, in fact, hate both cars and infrastructure that exists solely to make using a car more expensive.

    the most viable alternative to traffic stops

    I have never heard of a town that reduced the size of its police force after installing a speed trap.


  • But the works and practice in mobilizing the workforce in the new deal played a big part in the US having industrial capability prior to WWII.

    Hard to power the 1940s industrial economy without coal. And hard to generate coal without an electrification of the Tennessee Valley. Without a doubt.

    Hell if there’s a miuntain range in your state you’re almost certainly getting some of your power from a hydro plant made in the 30’s.

    Given his attitude towards public works, it’s very funny that Hoover has the nation’s largest dam named after him.




  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlI'm beginning to notice a pattern
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    In fairness, if you get under the hood of the New Deal benefits, they relieved a lot of immediate suffering and mobilized a workforce that had been functionally abandoned by the private sector.

    But they didn’t “grow the economy” in the same way as the enormous investment in the Military Industrial Complex achieved. The Citizens Conservation Corps and the Social Security Administration didn’t create the kind of high paying engineering and manufacturing jobs that state demand for thousands of new tanks and ships achieved.

    WW2 full mobilization of the economy wasn’t just taking in the slack of a depressed market. It was a command economy in all but name, dictating every aspect of the industrial chain, from extraction to expenditure to recovery and recycling.

    The tragedy of WW2 is that we could only permit this kind of logistical achievement for the purpose of joining a bloodbath in Europe, North Africa, and East Asia. As soon as Roosevelt passed, Truman began reprivatizing the economy as quickly as possible.