• Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Depends entirely on your definition of art.

      To me, art is “playing with your senses”. The way a painting plays with your vision. Music plays with your hearing. Food plays with your taste. …

      And in that sense, a generated image is art. Especially if it evokes emotions like hate for being AI generated.

      • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        It’s not.

        Words matter. For example, calling an LLM “AI” has incorrectly shaped people’s perception of its abilities. This is a core aspect of marketing for this reason, and the choice to call it “AI” was specifically to take advantage of how much word choice matters in shaping perception.

        • BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          Video games have been calling computer opponents AI for years and no one bothered to complain that those aren’t actually intelligent.

          No one expects the AI in warcraft 3 to be able to solve all the world’s problems, so I don’t know why this suddenly became different.

          • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Yeah yeah. The definition of AI has now fundamentally changed. Notice that I never said an LLM is not a form or subset of AI at all. The term “AI” has a much broader scope than an LLM and because of that people think it can do more than it is capable. An LLM cannot reason—it just predicts the next most likely word to follow with some additional weights as a loose guideline.

              • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 days ago

                Posting only a link to a wikipedia page is obnoxious. You’re not even bothering to explain how you think it’s relevant. In this case that would be particularly important since the “AI effect” you linked has nothing to do with what I said.

                Are you too lazy to even explain, are incapable of explaining, or are you just regurgitating whatever you can find in an attempt to overwhelm with low-effort “arguments”? (This is rhetorical. Please just go away, since you’re clearly only here with bad faith.)

                • Hackworth@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  The definition of AI has now fundamentally changed.

                  “The AI effect” refers to a phenomenon where either the definition of AI or the concept of intelligence is adjusted to exclude capabilities that AI systems have mastered.

  • WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    The really frightening part is that she really is out there somewhere and almost nobody knows where and she could show up at any time. Then out of nowhere…GOOP right on your face.

    #Gwinning