I like the artwork, I approve of the message, and this gave me a chuckle.
But c’mon, like, it’s against the rules. If you are annoyed by AI art being submitted to human art contests, you should be annoyed by this too.
The first time I read about AI art being submitted to a human contest and winning, I thought, “how drôle.” Of course, now I see it violates the spirit of competition. AI art should have its own category – and that doesn’t just go one way. Like it or not, AI is a tool and if some people want to explore how to use it to make good content, let’s let them do that in peace.
Actually I don’t have to be ok with anyone contributing to the burning down of the planet. I feel like adults should have a better understanding of morality than simply “its against the rules and is therefore wrong”.
No man what are you doing! We already used the “well actually it’s bad because uhhh climate change” argument against cryptocurrencies, you can’t double-dip like! When you hate on AI you’re supposed to use the “but it’s plagiarism” argument! Everyone knows that!
We are literally putting our means of expressing ourselves into the hands of a few people. So once they just decide that cats are now not allowed, no one will be able to create memes about cats
You are fueling a machine that google is selling to the genocide in Gaza.
You will never be able to create new things. Since an AI only has relatively few nodes that are random (so it can output different things when given the same input) let’s say about 10% of your picture is actually new, and the rest plagiarised. You could just input that again and make it more random, but inputting something AI generated into an AI just makes it shit itself, it will not be „random” like an artist thinks about making a new way of expressing themselves”,but random as in „let’s just expose a drive to extreme radiation and see what the data looks like after 1000 bitflips
The data collection. If a normal human collected that much data about me I could just sue them for stalking
I like the artwork, I approve of the message, and this gave me a chuckle.
But c’mon, like, it’s against the rules. If you are annoyed by AI art being submitted to human art contests, you should be annoyed by this too.
The first time I read about AI art being submitted to a human contest and winning, I thought, “how drôle.” Of course, now I see it violates the spirit of competition. AI art should have its own category – and that doesn’t just go one way. Like it or not, AI is a tool and if some people want to explore how to use it to make good content, let’s let them do that in peace.
Actually I don’t have to be ok with anyone contributing to the burning down of the planet. I feel like adults should have a better understanding of morality than simply “its against the rules and is therefore wrong”.
I think most people don’t really develop moral reasoning past “I don’t want to get punished” or, if you’re lucky, “it’s against the rules.”
No man what are you doing! We already used the “well actually it’s bad because uhhh climate change” argument against cryptocurrencies, you can’t double-dip like! When you hate on AI you’re supposed to use the “but it’s plagiarism” argument! Everyone knows that!
OK then
Just run your AI models locally? Problem solved lol.
So you want to buy me and every about like 10 million people a server that can run a halfway good LLM Model and pay the electric bills?
Also it dosent change any point except 2
No, that sounds expensive
It does actually
OK, so you just want everyone to just pull 20k out of their ass to buy themselves hardware to run a LLM on?
Tell me how.