Summary

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron held a call to discuss the potential implications of Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency for Europe.

The leaders pledged to strengthen cooperation for a “more united, stronger, more sovereign Europe” in light of this possibility. Macron emphasized a commitment to European sovereignty while maintaining cooperation with the U.S. Additionally, German and French defense ministers plan to meet to coordinate on defense policies.

Trump’s ambiguous stance on Russia’s war in Ukraine and his critical view of NATO burden-sharing raise concerns in Europe about future U.S.-Europe relations.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      He’ll start buying russian natural resources at a dollar on the dime and gas prices will drop a little bit and all the dumb idiots that voted for him will drool and smile because “ooga booga feels good” while he pulls out of nato and the world marches towards WWIII

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        He’ll start buying russian natural resources at a dollar on the dime

        How does that make any fucking sense when he wants to drill on US land? Do you guys even think about the shit you post before you post it?

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    American here.

    Please embargo us. Make it clear that you will not work with a fascist state.

    I want our economy to be in fucking ruins come 2026, when 20 Republican senators are up for reelection. If we take the house and a 2/3rds majority in the Senate and we can end this shit in January 2027.

    But we need the anger and pain the Republicans have tapped into to fuel the fire to wipe the GOP from existence. And we need the Dems to stop playing fair. We need to go scorched-earth on these motherfuckers.

    • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Honestly you sound like you are part of the problem with America if you would rather see your country ruined in some self-fulfilling prophecy just so that your political opponents will lose next election.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ll gladly lose money and comfort for a few years to protect the people I love from what Trump and his minions will to do.

        Every day they’re in power is a threat.

    • Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      in fucking ruins

      It will somehow just be “the democrats fault” or those pesky brown invaders. And will fire up the base to vote in another shitclown.

    • timestatic@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There is no way in which the US will be embargod. Even under trump european nations will try to keep a mostly beneficial relation with the US due to the economic reliability and US strength in global politics. Sorry bud!

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Fuck embargos, invade and liberate us. Return the favor we did for Germany 80 years ago.

  • soycapitan451@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Close Cooperation with eachother. The USA can no longer be seen as a reliable partner with its wild ideological swings and a lack of strong commitment to the cause.

    Make or break for a strong European State.

    From a UK perspective we’re absolutely fucked due to Brexit. USA is unreliable, detached from the EU, what’s left? BRICS? Lol.

    Shit.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      BRICS? Lol.

      It’d be BRICSUK then. Kinda close to Brexit. Just paint it as the next step after Brexit.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ah the UK and EU are inexorably intertwined. Don’t stress too much. We’re still best buds.

  • Nihilistra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Try to give some nukes to every eastern border country.

    Poland already said they’ll get the bomb asap. Not like we have anything to lose.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Europe needs to step up on Ukraine. NATO is out of the picture, the EU needs to stand in its place.

    • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Europe needs to step up on Ukraine.

      Realistically, I doubt the western european public opinions are ready to accept 20 year old kids coming home in a coffin. If we put boots on the ground, I expect the war to be more deadly than recent middle-east operations.

      So while we could kick of Russia ass, I don’t think we’re ready to pay the political price, at least for Ukraine.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Ironically I think policy support would have been much easier had we put boots on the ground right away. There was initially enormous support for Ukraine, and sending out own soldiers would have given voters a continued vested interest in the war.

        Not saying the outcome would have been better, and there is always the threat of nuclear war. However, it would totally changed the course and focus of elections, and my impression is that voters like it when politicians take risks, even if it doesn’t pan out (and even if it’s suicidally stupid).

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          and sending out own soldiers would have given voters a continued vested interest in the war.

          As a veteran… You’re volunteering right?

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        76
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        This is more about ramping up domestic arms production to fill the gap that is going to come from US production no longer going to Ukraine.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Western Europe, yep, there’s not much appetite for that. Southern, neither, Northern, I wouldn’t count them out, Baltics will look to the North, Central (without Germany)… basically the only reason Poland didn’t put boots on the ground yet is NATO.

        The French might get involved for dignity’s sake, but on a backfoot – special forces, long-range operations. Also sending French MREs is always a good idea.

        EDIT: Oh, Italy. Meloni hates Putin’s guts, the FDI may go in even without appetite because well the “post” in “post-fascist” doesn’t mean that they’ve got rid of fascists’ admiration for war, just the more obvious self-defeating aspects. Struggles of national sovereignty seem to be right up their alley. Greece is too broke either way and Turkey will be on Turkey’s side.

    • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s not entirely correct. While the US is without a doubt the biggest part of (and contributor to) NATO, it consists of a few other nations as well. But you are absolutely right that Europe needs to get their shit together because it is very likely that the US will scale down their NATO involvement

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Some did. Then most were happy to go back to sleep as Biden won in 2020. Trump was ignorantly considered a hiccup instead of the expression of a deeper issue with the US.

      As the election today showed so did the US Democrats think things could just continue in the same way. And here we are again.

  • CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Well that’s one good thing to come from the election. Best case scenario America just fucks itself over (and not the rest of the world) while giving all of the EU a common enemy to help further strengthen the bonds.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The bonds are deteriorating beyond repair. This won’t be enough. Trump win will embolden the rising far right in EU countries. There’s no good thing, I’m afraid. Sorry for my pessimism.

    • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t think you understand. The faction taking over won’t stop with the US. They want unfettered power. They’re well aware American military might exceeds the rest of the world combined by tenfold and will eventually use it to intimidate or destroy anyone in their way, after subjugating our own citizenry of course.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They should call it the United State of Europe instead if Union and get it over with.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If Europe wants to keep the front line east of Ukraine, they better get on that right now. That front line will not stop at the western border.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Summary:

    There will be lots of winded and inspired speeches. Nothing will happen, Europe will stay divided while each country seeks advantages on its own for petty short term gains. The populists will continue to gain footholds, and to conquer lands.

  • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Trump’s ambiguous stance on Russia’s war in Ukraine and his critical view of NATO burden-sharing raise concerns in Europe about future U.S.-Europe relations.

    Absolutely nothing ambiguous about it. Everyone knows where he stands. Exactly where every lapdog stands, behind and slightly off to the side of their master…

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Everyone knows where he stands.

      I strongly suspect that isn’t true. I think anti-Trump people know where he stands, but I bet a lot of pro-Trump people are about to be in for a big surprise.

      • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Ah, yes…the old “leopards are eating people’s faces, but how was I supposed to know that it’d be my face?” bit.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I heard yesterday about how a lot of Imams in Michigan posed for selfies with him.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    273
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You guys better ramp up arms production and switch to a partial wartime stance. Because Russia isn’t going to stop with Ukraine.

    • anonymous111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They’ve got nukes though, and plenty of conventional fire power (compared to Ukraine when it was invaded).

      They need to invest in a non US lead command structure as that’s all using US tech and personnel.