• GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    Free if you have no other exemptions to file.

    1099? Nope Depreciation? Nope Tax credits? Nope

    Makes for a great headline though.

    Im sure those of us that do have exemptions other than the standard will see our tax prep fees skyrocket

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Some progress is better then no progress, and TurboTax et. al. losing in any way is a victory for the rest of us.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Some people in the USA want a solution that immediately fixes every possible problem, and don’t quite get the concept of starting small and fixing other stuff over time.

        It’s the same with gun control. Some states want to tighten gun laws, and some people are like “that won’t solve all the problems! We need nationwide laws!”. Sure, but why not accept the win that more and more states are starting to do something, rather than complaining that some problems still exist?

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      are you not capable of taking a win? it’s a HUGE step towards disassembling predatory cpas and tax software.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        it’s a HUGE step towards disassembling predatory cpas and tax software.

        Its a regular sized step, as its targeted primarily at simple filers. But the cutoff is incredibly low. You can’t use it if you’ve got retirement savings through an IRA, if you’ve got deductions for college expenses, or if you’re claiming the child care deduction. I’d wager that’s at least half the people who bother to file returns.

        Definitely good news for folks that H&R Block likes to fleece - anyone collecting EITC or Child Tax Credits and not much else. But hardly universal.

        • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          do you think it won’t eventually add that stuff? pretty naive to just “meh” and basically call it a failure. nothing happens overnight.

          • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It’s not a “failure” but I wouldn’t call it a huge win either. It’s a small victory with a tiny horn to toot.

            IIRC there was a free version of Turbo Tax that did the same thing years ago… so we’re catching up to the old free version now.

            • macattack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              *An old free version that was purposefully hidden and buried by reverse SEO tactics, but yeah

    • meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe not. You will have the same number of tax preparers chasing less work. Through the magic of the Free Market™️, shouldn’t that mean pressure to reduce prices? We can only hope.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, very limited, but it’s very good for more than half of the population that don’t have enough deductions to exceed the standard and don’t own property (if you properly count houseless “households” that earn income as not owning property and not just renters like most statistics). It’s dumb that they have to file a return anyway just to acres money that never should have been collected. Most just don’t know how to properly file their W-4 to not have taxes withheld in the first place. Mostly because they follow the directions and/or are afraid of paying a fine plus interest.

      Anyway, it’s a step in the right direction. And if we can unbury all of the staff out of the pile of paper returns, we can devote some to go after the rich and their frivolous, often fraudulent deductions and have them pay the tax they owe.

      • Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most just don’t know how to properly file their W-4 to not have taxes withheld in the first place.

        How do you do this? How do you calculate what to personally withhold and pay? Is it simply calculating through the income tax?

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          There’s a worksheet that usually comes with it where you answer questions about your living situation - single/married, homeowner/renter, how many kids, etc. - and it gives you a number to put in. It’s pretty accurate. I’ve done it at every job and aside from years with tax credits I’ve never gotten back more than a few hundred bucks.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve had 1099s and tax credits and I’ve never sent in a paper return. I keep the records in case of an audit but it’s not like e-file hasn’t existed forever.

        • irotsoma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          But it hasn’t always been free to file electronically. The government made it required for them to offer free versions for simple returns, but that was recent.

          Also, access to the Internet isn’t universal. You’d be surprised how much of the US doesn’t have affordable Internet and a fair number don’t have Internet available at all, or limited to just dialup which is not very useful. And a lot of apps don’t work right on phone browsers, especially older phones, so then you need a desktop or laptop which a lot of people don’t have. Some have access in libraries, but a lot don’t or traveling to a library is a burden. And lots of other reasons that internet isn’t a given for a large portion of households. So paper is still not just necessary, but the easiest way.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, the point was that it isn’t competition in his scenario. I hope the exclusion of 1099 is temporary, because I had a 1099 for like a few dollars because I had a savings account that technically accrued interest, so as it stands that makes me ineligible. So his concern would be that because the tax prep services are competing against ‘free’ for that tier, that they’ll ramp up prices for the rest to compensate for loss of income.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Given that savings accounts are at 1% interest or so, that’s only a thousand dollars in a savings account.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Good savings accounts are above 4% these days. Wealthfront is 5%, Synchrony is 4.75%, Marcus (Goldman Sachs) is 4.4%, Amex, Discover, Capital One, Ally, are 4.25%

        • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hypothetical question: If you omitted the couple bucks of income from the 1099 on that one savings account and you later got audited- how much money would you be on the hook for? what would the consequences be in worst case and likely case scenarios?

          I honestly think the government has next to no resources now to go after tax cheats that aren’t hiding tens to hundreds of thousands of owed taxes… but would love to hear what others have to say. I suspect missing out on less than a dollar of taxes from omitting a single figure 1099 would not be big enough to chase and if found probably less costly than hiring a preparer every year when averaged out over your lifetime of tax returns.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Perhaps practically speaking you probably would get an automated form from IRS demanding a few dollars. But it’d be nice if qualification for ‘direct file’ option didn’t rely on “mild tax evasion” for people with savings accounts.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would suggest you get hired by the IRS and start rewriting all their ancient code to build in and allow every deduction rule and that it’s applied correctly every time so everyone can use it.

      The tax laws are so large and so complex and the code running all this stuff is so old and now locked in because they didn’t keep up with updating their software as they went along. I’m amazed they got this far. Oh, and like you, I can’t use it either. But that’s why I have an accountant.