TL;DR: Mozilla is now enforcing data collection as a pre-requisite to access new features in Firefox Labs. This is backed by the Terms of Use that Mozilla introduced a few months ago.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    this article seems like clickbait

    they’re just requiring telemetry to test optional features that are in testing.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    That kind of makes sense? Aren’t the labs when they’re A/B testing or benchmarking new features before general release and toggle random people’s settings doing so? I vaguely recall some drama around that.

    If I turn off telemetry I want those off too, it makes sense they’re linked. It you want a new feature there’s always nightly+about:config, but I don’t want it downloading random config toggles especially if it’s not reporting back that it broke my stuff. The code should be what I installed, not some random lab blob downloaded off their servers at runtime.

    • infeeeee@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      IIRC they used labs for “ads” in the past, so disabling labs was already recommended, now it’s just double recommended.

    • gaael@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That kind of makes sense? Aren’t the labs when they’re A/B testing or benchmarking new features before general release and toggle random people’s settings doing so?

      Per the article, the A/B testing rollout already exists in Studies:

      Mozilla introduced studies as “controlled A/B tests built right into Firefox” and they “allow us to compare proposed changes to the default experience in Firefox for small, representative, populations before shipping those changes to everyone.”

      I have no detailed knowledge on any of this, so I don’t know how accurate the article really is.

  • renard_roux@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is nothing sacred? 🙄

    Are there any open source forks that still allow bookmark and settings sync?

      • dumnezero@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d like a browser that can sync those things with a local folder that I can sync/backup however I want, no account required. Does anyone know of such a thing?

          • dumnezero@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Thanks, I’ll look into it. I tend to avoid messing with the local app folders which are often hidden and can be break if you change something.

            • Zikeji@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve migrated my Firefox profile to multiple different computers and even from Firefox to Floorp. No issues. It’s also something I have backed up to my NAS daily since it contains everything - just plop it in and I’ve got everything the way it was before.

  • Fletcher@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I always find it hilarious that all of these anti-Firefox articles and posts always seem to point people toward Chrome, in the end. It’s almost as if there’s a concerted effort by a mega-corporation that specializes in spyware to trick people into using their products by artificially seeding social networks with pro-Google sentiments. So strange…

  • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    What a misleading, clickbait title:

    Mozilla moves away from open source

    When the author really meant:

    Mozilla does a thing I don’t like