Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-223 hours agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down12
arrow-up155arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-223 hours agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 hours agoThe US and / or Russia would obtain it ASAP, by hook or crook. Followed rapidly by World War 3
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-24 hours agoSo conventional warfare?
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agoYour premise is that nuclear warfare is no longer possible, so by default, yes.
The US and / or Russia would obtain it ASAP, by hook or crook. Followed rapidly by World War 3
So conventional warfare?
Your premise is that nuclear warfare is no longer possible, so by default, yes.