Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down12
arrow-up160arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 hours agoSo conventional warfare?
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 hours agoYour premise is that nuclear warfare is no longer possible, so by default, yes.
So conventional warfare?
Your premise is that nuclear warfare is no longer possible, so by default, yes.