Oh yes, no argument there. That’s my entire point, in fact.
Oh yes, no argument there. That’s my entire point, in fact.
Warning: Unpopular opinion coming up
This is a ridiculous metric. They measure carbon emissions not just by what the billionaires are consuming, but by what their investments (businesses, factories, etc) are producing. This is akin to the world blaming China for their grossly inflated per capita emissions, while conveniently ignoring that it’s actually being consumed by other countries and it’s just shifting numbers around.
There are plenty of legit reasons to hate billionaires, there’s really no need to be making up new questionable ones that can be torn apart.
That’s pretty much the point. The steam deck was a huge success, but the only reason it could exist and be such a success was because they had the freedom to do what they liked and not worry about management with attitudes like yours.
Good thing you weren’t working at steam, huh.
Steam DRM doesn’t have quite the same history of maliciousness towards end users that Denuvo does
Pretty sure that’s how it should be working on any UI.
What makes you think he’s an idiot as opposed to lying through his teeth?
- ‘It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it’
Is that not how it currently works? I was under the impression that’s how it works for me at least. What behaviour are you seeing?
By the same logic however, mods would have no power to actually moderate. Their moderation ability is directly proportional to their potential for abuse. And I think we can all agree we’ve long passed the point where communities are able to survive without moderation, at least in their current form (which is what OP is discussing).
Is this the artist’s first attempt at speech bubbles? Jeez
If you’re going to remove 90% of the content on lemmy, is there even a point staying on it?
I hope she actually liked the outfit. She looks kinda uncertain
I said EU, not UK. But it turns out they ARE licensed in the UK as well.
Revolut should be watching for suspicious transactions and blocking them like proper banks are required to do.
There’s nothing in the article to indicate this isn’t already the case. No suspicious activity algorithm will be foolproof. Also, revolut is certified as an actual bank in the EU, and subject to the standard bank regulations.
All I’m reading in this article is stupid people who don’t follow basic security practices. Why is any of this Revolut’s fault?
It’s a standard YouTube video, what are you going on about?
The autistic part is literally in the article and was brought up during the defense
Really shitty scaremongering article. I’d like to know how exactly increased investment in fusion could potentially make it unsuitable for public use, as the article claims?
Pretty sure that’s just dust buildup