For me, it was when my friend told me he uses Twitter AI to tell him things to buy. My hope for humanity was already gone, but that definitely didn’t help it. That, and the fact younger people don’t search anymore, they go right to a chat bot.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    People fact-checking me with incorrect information fed to them by Google AI search.

  • karpintero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Reading comprehension and writing are two things that stand out to me. I’ve noticed people don’t want to expend the mental effort to read long prose so they’ll just ask for a summary of it. Same goes for writing emails or reports.

    Critical thinking skills are a like muscle that needs to be used or else it will atrophy. Asking AI to think for me is like going to the gym and asking the trainer to lift weights for me.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Facebook pushing AI friends to solve loneliness. It’s like they heard about dead internet theory and thought it sounded good.

  • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Vibe coding. I’m seeing my highly intelligent department of software developers pick up their new AI-powered IDEs and immediately start phoning it in. I’m being asked to review code that was obviously written by AI, obviously not understood by the „author“, and obviously does not and cannot work. And it’s happening more and more as we „increase our velocity“. I’m very worried for the next generation.

    But I also go to a chat bot to get search results. It used to be you could use google and add some + and - keywords to narrow down what you need. Now the results are so terrible (once you scroll past all the AI slop and advertising) that it’s completely unusable for searching for anything that isn’t shopping.

    • Ænima@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I read somewhere on here that if you add the word fucking to the search, it doesn’t contain AI and can’t be used for AI training. I have not tried it, myself.

      • haverholm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        That may work, but has its own downsides. Say you’re looking for a reference photo of really any object, but in the worst case scenario a child or an animal… You’ll be on a bunch of watch lists in no time flat.

  • Mist101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Taught for a while. Last few years students went from turning in plagiarised essays with small enough tweaks to pass detection to full on LLM-written bullshit that they couldn’t even explain when asked. The turning point was when parents started defending their kids submission of AI slop, even when it would begin “As a language learning model,…”

    • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      As someone with dyslexia, I know the word, I know what it means, I’m placing it in the correct spot. I just get the spelling wrong. Completely different than ai slop.

      • morphballganon@mtgzone.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not talking about dyslexia. I’m talking about people who knew how to spell things 20 years ago and then forgot.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ewww search? What’s wrong with people not going straight to their encyclopedia Britannica?

    Eww encyclopedia? What’s wrong with asking your village elder?

    Eww village elder? What’s wrong with performing a series of experiments yourself in order to learn the truth