Stephen Miller, a top aide, repeated a justification used in the immigration crackdown: that the country is fighting an invasion. But it is unclear if the president has the power to take such a step.
If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.
This administration has repeatedly shown not to care about the status or criminal history of any non-US-born person. Also, they have revoked the status of legal migrants to be able to call them “illegal migrants” directly after, despite them doing everything correctly and being in America legally until the rug was pulled out from under them.
And aside from all of that, why are we okay with the government even thinking of doing this to anybody??? That should be a major red flag even as something they are considering. But based on their previous actions, it’s definitely something they want to do, which is even worse
EDIT: Just realized your username is “freedom advocate”. You of all people should be against this.
I want to add that the people in charge of these policies have repeatedly made statements showing that their true feelings/intent aren’t about legal/illegal status:
Stephen Miller said in public that the 9-0 Supreme Court ruling to bring back Kilmar Abrego Garcia (whose deportation to a modern day concentration camp was, by their own admission, an “administrative error”) actually said the opposite of what it did. He’s made a lot of off-hand statements about migrants, usually to avoid mentioning their legal status, to the tune of “they don’t look like you” or “you wouldn’t want him as your neighbor” which is literally just racism.
Tom Homan “border czar” said in an interview that to prevent family separation, they can just deport the whole family.
Kristi Noem has made few appearances but each time it seems like she’s “cruelty is the point” personified. For instance, she recently did a photo op at CECOT with prisoners behind her with the classic “this is what you get if you come here illegally” speech. But to me the worst part is when, totally unforced, she wrote in her book about how she killed her puppy with a bullet to the head because it wasn’t keen on killing animals on its first hunting trip and wanted to play instead. When asked about it, she said that “that’s just what you do on the farm” and started listing other animals she’d killed for mild annoyances.
These people are psychopaths. They saw it’s easy to suck up to Trump and convince him to support their ideas in exchange for treating him like dear leader. I maintain that Trump is the only one in that admin who isn’t a soulless demon, but he’s so easy to flatter.
They aren’t “trying to” do what the NYT says they are, the actual quote in the article even proves that. They said it’s something that they might consider. Those are not the same things.
If they were “trying to” they would have begun proceedings to do it. Have they? No.
The article says they are considering it. I have no idea what your complaint even is. And I already debunked your lies that only undocumented people are being abducted. So you are full of shit and everyone can see that.
jumps at legal justification for their racism the second they get the chance under the incredibly flimsy guise of “law and order” just like every other Nazi
The point was that the regime (“administration”) has cast their net far too wide; they’re not rounding up just illegal immigrants as you suggest, you wretched fuck. But of course you already know that and you’re just here to troll—or are you so fucking stupid to blindly believe that the regime has only acted against illegal immigrants?
FTFY NY Times.
It’s also a lie. They’re not “trying to”, they said that it is something that they might consider. It has been done 4 times before too.
This administration has repeatedly shown not to care about the status or criminal history of any non-US-born person. Also, they have revoked the status of legal migrants to be able to call them “illegal migrants” directly after, despite them doing everything correctly and being in America legally until the rug was pulled out from under them.
And aside from all of that, why are we okay with the government even thinking of doing this to anybody??? That should be a major red flag even as something they are considering. But based on their previous actions, it’s definitely something they want to do, which is even worse
EDIT: Just realized your username is “freedom advocate”. You of all people should be against this.
I want to add that the people in charge of these policies have repeatedly made statements showing that their true feelings/intent aren’t about legal/illegal status:
These people are psychopaths. They saw it’s easy to suck up to Trump and convince him to support their ideas in exchange for treating him like dear leader. I maintain that Trump is the only one in that admin who isn’t a soulless demon, but he’s so easy to flatter.
Randomly generated username.
Why are we ok with it? No one said they’re ok with it. I was simply commenting on the lies the NYT are spreading.
So far I’m seeing that what they wrote was far more accurate than what you did.
100% wrong but you do you.
No, this isn’t an agree to disagree situation. You are factually wrong, the NYT is correct. Stop spreading misinformation or fuck off.
The NYT is factually wrong.
They aren’t “trying to” do what the NYT says they are, the actual quote in the article even proves that. They said it’s something that they might consider. Those are not the same things.
If they were “trying to” they would have begun proceedings to do it. Have they? No.
Oh the irony.
The article says they are considering it. I have no idea what your complaint even is. And I already debunked your lies that only undocumented people are being abducted. So you are full of shit and everyone can see that.
Looks like the article was updated to change from “trying to” to “considering” lol. Seems even their editors agree with me.
Oh yeah, none of the immigrants were here legally at all
/sThe illegal ones? No, they’re not - hence being illegal immigrants lol.
> FreedomAdvocate
> Dosen’t support freedom of movement.
The point was that the regime (“administration”) has cast their net far too wide; they’re not rounding up just illegal immigrants as you suggest, you wretched fuck. But of course you already know that and you’re just here to troll—or are you so fucking stupid to blindly believe that the regime has only acted against illegal immigrants?
Buh-bye! 👋
They are only rounding up illegal immigrants. Your entire point is based on a lie.
Completely and blatantly false. You are the one spreading lies here.
Here’s a small sampling but there are many more. I couldn’t find a comprehensive list and it might not exist.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/detained-or-deported-growing-list-of-immigrants-with-legal-status-caught-in-crackdowns/ar-AA1BedZ6
You don’t know someone’s legal immigration status until you find out. The only people that have been deported or jailed are illegal immigrants.
Read the article dumbass. Some of these people are still imprisoned and the government knew they were legal when they grabbed them.
Which ones did they know were legal but grabbed them anyway?
Your retarded laws aren’t legitimate idiot. Country aren’t house, stop hoarding the land. All they are for is to enforce racial segregation