If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.

    • whatalute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Are the immigrants the whit…I mean RIGHT skin color?? Cause this administration is filled to the brim with stable geniuses who are ✨ magically ✨ able to tell who is legal and who isn’t. We should tottaaaaalllly trust their judgement without question, they just want what’s best for the country, with absolutely NO ulterior motives.

      /S

  • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If “migrants” have no right to appeal to the courts, citizens don’t really have the ability to either.

    “Oh he’d never do that to real Americans…”

    Meanwhile, the leopards are waiting.

  • opus86@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I doubt this administration is going to stop pushing it’s lawlessness unless there is push back with consequences. Throw Stephen Miller into a CIA black site and watch how fast this crazy shit stops.

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Stephen Miller? The migrant? Yeah, sounds good. I heard he crossed the Darien Gap by eating five toddlers as rations.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    *Trying to suspend

    The headline is not doing constitutional democracy and the rule of law any favors by making casual readers think they have that power, which (sorry to be all technical, NYT) they do not have.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      (sorry to be all technical, NYT)

      No reason to apologize. The NYT routinely do it on purpose, especially when it comes to cops and Israel.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    detained illegal immigrants

    FTFY NY Times.

    It’s also a lie. They’re not “trying to”, they said that it is something that they might consider. It has been done 4 times before too.

    • hyperhopper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      This administration has repeatedly shown not to care about the status or criminal history of any non-US-born person. Also, they have revoked the status of legal migrants to be able to call them “illegal migrants” directly after, despite them doing everything correctly and being in America legally until the rug was pulled out from under them.

      And aside from all of that, why are we okay with the government even thinking of doing this to anybody??? That should be a major red flag even as something they are considering. But based on their previous actions, it’s definitely something they want to do, which is even worse

      EDIT: Just realized your username is “freedom advocate”. You of all people should be against this.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Randomly generated username.

        Why are we ok with it? No one said they’re ok with it. I was simply commenting on the lies the NYT are spreading.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              No, this isn’t an agree to disagree situation. You are factually wrong, the NYT is correct. Stop spreading misinformation or fuck off.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                The NYT is factually wrong.

                They aren’t “trying to” do what the NYT says they are, the actual quote in the article even proves that. They said it’s something that they might consider. Those are not the same things.

                If they were “trying to” they would have begun proceedings to do it. Have they? No.

                Stop spreading misinformation

                Oh the irony.