• China’s finance ministry on Friday said it will impose a 34% tariff on all goods imported from the U.S. starting on April 10.
  • The ministry criticized Washington’s decision to impose 34% of additional reciprocal levies on China — bringing total U.S. tariffs against the country to 54% — as “inconsistent with international trade rules.”
  • U.S. stock futures and European markets fell sharply on news of the reciprocal tariffs.

https://archive.ph/ZmcZJ

  • udc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    19 小时前

    If every country he puts tariffs on ends up implementing their own retaliatory tariffs, what would happen?

    • SnuffyThePunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 小时前

      You see, when the US pisses on the rest of the world, the rest of the world gets wet - But when the rest of the world will piss on the US, the US will drown.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 小时前

      The rest of the world starts building a new world order and economic system, one that will be a lot less advantageous to the USA than the one they just trashed.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 小时前

      So a tariff is like punching the other guy but also punching yourself, only the US is doing that to a lot of people so all the other countries get hit a few times sure but the US is beating itself black and blue.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 小时前

      The United States descends to the level of economic relevance as South Africa and the rest of the world continues as usual.

      Trade tariffs can work if they are used as a scalpel, If they are applied very precisely and explicitly they kind of achieve the desired effect. Trump is just wielding them around like a mallet and is repeatedly hitting himself in the groin while everyone stands at a safe distance away and watches with mild amusement.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 小时前

      Imagine everything currently produced on earth loses about a third of its efficiency/affordability and a large chunk of everything has shortages/unavailability for the next 30 years.

      Now imagine with the loss of trade relationships diplomacy slowly returns to that of the dark ages and a new era of war begins.

      Things we take for advantage are peace and prosperity.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      edit-2
      18 小时前

      Look at Cuba. Now look at the US. Now look at Cuba again.

      Okay, now image Cuba but without the public health care, housing, jobs programs, and mass transit.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 小时前

        In your exampke Cuba is the rest of the world, not a small backwater embargoed country.

        • nodiratime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 小时前

          No, The US takes Cuba’s place, just as in their example.

          The US in the past pressured the world to embargo Cuba, now the US is forcing the hand of the rest of the world to work without it. Different causes, similar-lish effects.