Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,” Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the “worst possible business executive” and praised the Wall Street Journal’s editorial criticizing Trump’s tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump’s false claims about immigrants.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I disagree Mr. Walz. Had Biden not sat on his hands after being given the power of god by the supreme court - we wouldn’t be in this mess today.

  • terribletzar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This headline is trash. He’s saying we wouldn’t be in this mess if they’d won. The headline makes it sound like he’s taking much more blame than his actual quote implies.

  • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Not you walz but the Democratic party. Send out 19 billion to Israel while our kids were hungry in school.

      • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Like as if Biden did not find Israel. 19 billion dollar of our money As a Democrat, I expected Biden to do better. We already know trump is crap. One worse does not make another one good. Both parties are bad. United States is doomed with just two parties. I don’t want any of these two parties. What’s you take?

        If you want to win my vote and many others, know your base well democrats. We are not here to elect the least worse, we are here to elect the best out there for this nation. And don’t come btching here because u guys literally are the one that said our vote does not count before the election. may be it suddenly does? See ya in 2028. Hope u learn some lesson.

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        So the answer is to keep slowly sliding into fascism with the ‘slightly less evil’ party, rather than forcing their hand in the hope of democratic reforms which stop the slide?

        • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The system is absolutely rigged and there are no winners. Americans are never gonna pull a france and pull out the guillotines. They hardly even protest. And when they do it’s because they want cheap eggs, gas or bot wearing masks. Or when a new iphone is out, then they have enough free time to camp on the street for a week.

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah yeah, continue giving excuses to the Democrats for not being as bad as the Republicans. They’re lucky they have supporters like you who will just take whatever bullshit they give out whenever they try and emulate the Republicans. Clearly you’re not satisfied with how right leaning the political system in America already is, you want them to go all the way. Considering how spineless their supporters are in making them shift their policies, I can see why they think it’s completely fine for them to offer mediocrity in the face of fascism.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    So it seems like it’s going to come down between Gavin The Transphobe and Tim Walz for 2028, and honestly Tim Walz is who I learn more towards, dude feels like a second coming of Bernie.

    Meanwhile Gavin started out in 2025 being the strong man who stared Trump down, but he not only folded, he sold out transpeople.

    Anyone who carries water for the “Transpeople are crazy and giving them basic human rights is going too far” is a danger to us all

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        The guy Democrats want to run for President…

        Problem he is a transphobic piece of shit who sucks the toes of Charlie Kirk

    • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      That’s only if Trump gives up his power after his 4 years… very unlikely. He will just start a war and impose martial law or just let the supreme court add a law that removes the limit, like they already proposed and if that doesn’t work, voter fraud with all the government officials getting fired is easy peasy. I think it’s over there is no comeback other than a bloody and voilent civil war or fascism until imperial collapse.

    • freely1333@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I wouldn’t even vote for Gavin and it’s not the trans shit he just did it’s that he stands for nothing and is just playing hang out with fascists. I’d rather trump tbh

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t love him, I don’t even know the guy and politicians are generally horrible enough people to give me pause.

      He DID seem to have the only decent angle of attack with the “weird” stuff so that looks good at least.

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate. You do have to wonder, especially after how Trump was greeted by them, just what actually happened here. The fact is that the truth about Bidens condition should have been known, he should have decided not to run, and the Democratic party should’ve had a real primary for real candidates and new ideas. Tim Walz was as bad of a VP pick as Tim Kaine. The white guy as VP to shore up the right wing vote is a total myth. Biden was kind of the first one, then Tim Kaine, then Tim Walz. It just doesn’t work. Neither will Newsoms podcast attempt at finding common ground which he hopes will translate into moderate votes. Democrats really have no clue just how bad things are about to get…

    • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      the truth about Bidens condition should have been known

      It was known, and lots of us were shouting from the rooftops about it, But Democrats and liberals did everything they could to shut us up, accuse us of being Russian bots, accuse us of helping to get Trump elected, when it was liberals that got Trump elected by ignoring the people that saw every single sign

      • forrcaho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It didn’t help that the New York Times and other media outlets were all in on talking shit about Biden, and that undermined their credibility on the age issue. It was only after Biden’s disastrous showing at his debate with Trump that the average voter had any credible evidence of his decline.

    • uuldika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Newsom pulls a Tulsi Gabbard and switches sides. He had Charlie Kirk (of TPUSA) on his podcast where he “completely aligned” with him on trans rights (i.e. eradicating us), then had Steve Bannon on. That’s a bit much even for the Liz Cheney flank of the DNC.

      I suspect Newsom doesn’t see any future for his party, and is bailing out instead.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That’s EXACTLY what I’m expecting, when he stood up to Trump I thought he’d be alright, but the dude has basically been courting the Far Right and going all in on being as transphobic as possible.

        He’ll run the sadly profitable “I was on the Left peacefully drinking Kombucha and eating Avocado Toast like the next pink pussyhat wearing hippie, but then they went too far when they tried to tell me the Holocaust actually happened! They’ve gone completely nuts!” grift.

      • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        In my experience, the higher up you go in both parties, you tend to sort of arrive at the same places with the same people… and most importantly, the same donors and the same money machine. That’s the great thing about the U.S. dollar really, corruption and selling Govt from Citizens United to today sort of drives the bipartisan nature of it because it all greases the wheels of the two party political machine.

        I’ve listened to several episodes of his podcast… I’ll probably continue listening but in the first episode Newsom basically kept saying he only got into college because his scores were low and he played baseball. Then he kept backing down to Charlie Kirk, Bannon, etc, while constantly saying he doesn’t know what to do and kept asking them for ideas. In the first episode, there was a moment where he said Jesus Fucking Christ or something to Charlie Kirk, which called him out on it. It’s like, the very voters he’s trying to go after will hear that and stop at the first episode. He will gain no allies on the right as he abandons the party he is supposed to believe in, along with the core values he is supposed to defend. He thinks having a podcast with right wing guests where he gets sort of transactional on the issues. Like, do you think giving up the trans in sports debate is going to win you anything when their entire side would like to see gay marriage go away entirely? While you claim to still even support that? Do these people even think any of this through?

        If Newsoms approach is the best the Democrats have to offer, then it might be game over for a very long time…

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Newsom is an amazing combination of a spineless coward and a heartless monster that if he’s the Democratic Candidate, it might be the first year I don’t vote. I will NEVER willingly put a transphobe in the White House.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      And every time you point this shit out, people will stick their fingers in their ears and say:

      You had a primary and we all picked Biden!

      Ignore that the 2016, 2020, and 2024 primaries were effectively just for show! Ignore that they argued in court they have no reason to follow democratic policies in their primaries!

      Ignore the evidence that the media hated outsiders that threatened their bank accounts and loved the ones that increased them!

      Turn off your brain and cut out your tongue, vote blue no matter who we pick for you!

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Ignore that the 2016, 2020, and 2024 primaries were effectively just for show! Ignore that they argued in court they have no reason to follow democratic policies in their primaries!

        the law literally says they don’t have to lmao, go take that up with the DNC or something.

        • yarr@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yeah, everyone keeps bringing this up like it’s some kind of dunk, but the DNC can basically run things as they please. Don’t like it? Start another party. The party’s procedure goes back a few decades by now. People act like when Biden dropped out they did this crazy double secret turbo maneuver but the fact is the DNC can put forth whomever they want.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate.

      the argument for this one is that the super pac was biden/harris, not any other random person, so it’s questionable whether they would’ve been able to use super pac funding at all especially at such short notice, given the technicalities of super pac funding. The majority of DNC funding, sure, but super pacs are most of the money in elections these days.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Gavin’s going to run more Diet Republican than any Democrat ever before and that’s going to make even my “Blue, no matter who!” ass not vote for him. I’m already thinking about staying home in '28 because Trump can’t win a third time and Gavin’s a transphobe.

  • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    honestly, if walz had been managed competently, I think he’d have been a pretty good folksy VP candidate. especially if he’d kept up on the ‘weeeeird’ stuff.

    harris was just a terrible idea, and she didn’t even push her strengths. it’s like she, and the people who put her there, were all trying to lose.

      • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        without the genocide and harris’ being simultaneously a woman of color (alienating fascists), a cop (alienating anyone with a conscience), and an arrogant symbol of the establishment that let it get so bad? yeah, fine red mist. it was a really good strategy. and they just stopped it, probably because a wealthy donor said it made them uncomfortable.

  • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,”
    (Implies that if they(H&W) would have won we wouldn’t be in this mess)

    has quite the different sentiment than

    “Tim Walz says ‘we wouldn’t be in this mess’ if it wasn’t for him and Harris” (Implies its their fault we are in this mess)

    These headlines -_-

    Not that I prefer straight bias but we got conservative media calling these people cutting all of everyone’s safety nets “heroes” and this is supposed to be liberal media straight misquoting for clicks?

    We are in the worst timeline.

    • forrcaho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      From the article:

      “We have to make sure that Americans know it’s not just that Donald Trump is bad but we’re offering them something better,” he continued. “And I think that’s what we need to work on.”

      That’s an admission of culpability.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I do blame them, though. They could have ridden the coattails of Biden’s withdrawal all the way to victory, but instead Hartis capitulated and palled around on stages with Republicans instead of Walz.

      The failure of the Democrat campaign has a lot of causes, but none more so than the failure of leadership.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Ultimately nobody wants to touch the issue of spiraling national and global wealth inequality, but it’s destroying our economic systems and the only fix would seem to be redistributing that wealth.

        Democrats need to force their doners to make concessions to the American people in order to get voters, which goes against the interests of their doners, and they won’t get elected without the money to spend on advertising that wins elections.

        Both the Republicans and the Neolibs lead to an oligarchhy.

  • exploitedamerican@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think this is a half assed acceptance of responsibility. Firstly i don’t believe our democracy even functions anymore. Our entire political system has been compromised by money, bribes, campaign contributions from billionaires. Both the dems and republicans are both fascist parties. The Democratic party any where else in the world by the standards of the rest of the developed world is a center right wing party we have no true left opposition party in the usa. The democrats are clearly a controlled opposition party who’s primary goal is to appease their wall street military and prison industry profiteer donors and prevent any policy shift to the left in order to thwart economic democracy and continue the class dictatorship that is modern neo liberal western “democracy” which is inherently undemocratic.

    There are 14 defining traits of fascism and 13 of them are present in both partied albeit to differing degrees. But the one trait that both parties work to maintain s plausible deniability as to its existence is fraudulent elections. But to think that even though money has corrupted every other aspect of our political system that for some reason maybe the ideals of American exceptionalism and the integrity of democracy itself, that one aspect of fascism is a bridge tok far to cross and those with extreme wealth and greed who lack all humanity and show no self Restraint on any given day would at least control themselves there for the good of mankind? If you truly believe that i have a bridge to sell you.

    In germany the highest constitutional court decided in the last 10-15 years or so(i don’t remember when exactly) that electronic voting is unconstitutional because it is impossible to differentiate between fraudulent results and legitimate ones for anyone who isn’t a cuber security or IT expert and its important that laymen(or lay people) can understand the results of an election and see the proof for themselves. And even if we put all this aside in 2016 we saw the Iowa caucus (a democratic process void of electronic obfuscation)deliberately manipulated for clinton despite sanders supporters outnumbering clinton supporters 2 to 1 and i remember seeing a video back then(i wish i had saved it) of election workers doing a test on a vote counting/tabulation machine to verify results and the machine completely skewed the inputed data which distressed all the workers participating to the point where 3 people were in tears.

    This isnt a “trump was right” statement because those who are nominated by the party are most likely complicit and know who will be chosen and even if they do not know till the media puts out the results and manufactures the consent of the people they still very likely know the reality. And Trump definitely knew in 2016 and had no problem the election was rigged then because it benefited him which means he doesn’t care that the election is rigged so long as he benefits and gains power from it.

    But regardless of what i believe it is the reality that every thing about our society is rigged by the ultra wealthy. And it is naive to believe that they would allow the workers the ability to choose who governs them when they regularly make it clear what they think of us. That we are a disposable commodity who’s existence is only a means for their own end. As a labor pool to exploit and wring dry for profit so they don’t have to do any of the things they see as beneath them while they live in opulent luxury and spend more on weekend vacations than you or i could earn in a dozen consecutive lifetimes.

    Now in the crazy off chance that our democracy actually does function (which is just impossible given the way the world is currently run by the .001%) then the democrats lost because they refuse to move to the left and they intentionally lost because their donors are the dame donors funding the republicans and democrats are under orders to sabotage any leftist populist candidates to maintain the class dictatorship that their billionaire owners have established and aim to maintain at all costs.

    Now let the butthurt neo liberal downvotes ensue.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s no leadership void in the Democratic Party, it’s been Bernard Sanders for quite a while. Them denying this is to their (and everyone elses) detriment. Just run Bernie/AOC and let’s get this over with.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Nancy Pelosi is the leadership of the Democrats. And AOC was not allowed to become top house dem. They chose Gerry Atrick Connely instead.

      AOC and Bernie will never be allowed to do anything besides sheepdogging progressives into the Democratic party. And at this point it appears they are fully on board with that.

      • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Pelosi, Schumer, Jeffries may control the official party apparatus, but when it comes to communicating and connecting with constituents and energizing the base, AOC and Bernie are clearly the only ones acting as opposition leaders.

      • CyboNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        At some point they have to fall in line and follow orders. Or fade into obscurity. It’s a truly shitty system. One long overdue for a big reset…

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I don’t blame Harris or Walz. I don’t even blame Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is.

    I blame the Americans for fucking up the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history.

    Has there ever been an election so obvious? Even during Trump vs Clinton one could almost be forgiven for giving Trump the benefit of the doubt as a “political outsider”, but by 2024 we knew exactly who this fucking guy was… The fact that people today are acting surprised and outraged about all the stuff that’s been happening during Trump’s first 1.5 months is only further proof that Americans are perhaps the dumbest amnesiacs to infest the Earth.

    Literally all we had to do was vote against Trump’s particular brand of fascism.

    But Americans are the type of people who fail a single question true or false quiz because they forgot to write their name at the top of the page, and we deserve to suffer the consequences of our collective stupidity over and over until it is bred out of us, or until our society falls. The American people allowed this to happen–and not just Trump, but everything bad that has happened over the course of American history.

    • Mandelbrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nah it’s actually their fault. The fact that they lost when it was “the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history” shows how hard they fucked a lay-up.

      • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I like picking random bad things that have happened in America an tieing it back to Regan. Usually it isn’t even hard.

    • Secluded_Serenity@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is

      That shit made me chuckle because of how true it is. Also, the way that you worded that is so perfect. Beautifully put.

    • laserm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The good think about the 2024 US election was that the choice was obvious to everyone who paid the littlest attention; the bad thing was that Americans chose the wrong candidate anyway.

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      My favourite part is how he made gains in (virtually?) all segments. It seems the economy was their number one concern too. Imagine thinking the current president was going to make the economy/their financial situation better…

      Like at some point you just need to call out the stupid.

    • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      How dare you!? America is a DEMOCRACY, and that means we can’t be blamed for how we vote. If I vote for Trump, I’m not at fault for what happens. In fact, it’s Harris’s fault. She should have pandered to me more. I can blame her, and only one person can be at fault for something, so I’m guilt free.

      You liberals are always trying to guilt trip us leftists for letting fascists take over the government!

  • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nope. This is on Biden. It’s his fault Harris/Walz were put into an impossible situation.

    That senile old fuck was supposed to be a one-term president. If they’d spent 4 years planning for 2024 instead of sitting around with their thumbs up their asses maybe they could have run a winning campaign.

    But no, Joe was too proud or stupid or both to stick to that plan. This election was lost the instant he doddered his way on to the debate stage on 6/27/24.

    • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lots and lots of balls were dropped. Garland didn’t get Trump in jail when he could have. Biden didn’t stick to only one term. A democratic candidate wasn’t really elected when Biden stepped down (for the record, I think that Harris was more than qualified, but a lot of people were upset that she was just “chosen”). Harris didn’t try to stand out and be her own candidate - she mostly just stuck with the status quo and never disagreed with Biden. Etc etc etc.

      • ExistentialKiwi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Warning bells started going off in my head the moment that the Democrats announced that Harris was going to be the candidate after Biden dropped out, not because I thought she was an unqualified candidate but because there was no time taken to search for other candidates. Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people’s opinions actually mattered. Biden dropping out was huge (at least to me) because it felt like an acknowledgement of the voters who had consistently felt like they were held hostage for their votes because the alternative was a fascist.

        It doesn’t help either that they went on to repeatedly shoot themselves in the feet while chasing moderate Republican votes, getting other prominent Democrats to chastise certain classes of voters and breeding the same voter apathy that hurt them in 2016, and their refusal to acknowledge that what’s happening in Gaza is a genocide that we shouldn’t help Israel perpetrate.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s also the campaign money, only goes to Harris, and not anyone else. They are legally required to return all that fundraising to the donors if they use a different candidate

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people’s opinions actually mattered.

          it was way too close for that, by the time you had found one, you would be weeks, if not one or two months prior to the election, with no VP, and only a candidate, you would’ve had to have started the primary at the time it normally does to pull that off, they took a gamble, and that gamble was that biden would ride it out, and im not really sure why they took that gamble, but they did, and they lost.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yeah, the moment I knew we were in trouble was when they publicized that video of Obama lecturing down to some black men about not supporting Harris enough. Whoever thought staging that was a good idea needs to retire from politics forever and go find a field to stand in.

        • FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          On your last point, I don’t think Dems could’ve done anything different. They’re clearly in Israel pockets and they can’t disobey their corporate overlords and run on a more progressive agenda. Only other option was to try hard to get the “centrists”. Incredibly disappointing as they would rather lose and go hard fascist rather than let their donors lose any money (how’s that stock market looking?).

      • NotLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Putting trump in jail would’ve made America look bad. Oh, the irony.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly, and it’s the third time we’ve been betrayed like this.

        Not going after the Bush administration.

        Not going after the subprime mortgage architects.

        Not going after Trump.

        Three times, they’ve had the easiest of layups for public approval of all time and they’ve consistently fucked it up.

        • NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s not really a fuck up when they did it deliberately. Their priorities are in the wrong place because it’s an oligarchy.

          • bishbosh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Seeing liberal’s repeatedly stumble in stopping anyone to the right, but having the fangs come out the moment they need to protect themselves from the left really shows that it’s not failure, it’s refusal.

            • NotLemming@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I see the same from the left though. Great criticism… of other leftists. Then defending authoritarian shitholes with dictators, like Russia. Makes no sense to me, it’s just tribalism.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                18 hours ago

                That’s a false dichotomy. There are more political ideologies left of center than status quo liberalism and tankism. Most leftists are very much critical of Russia, because it’s an imperialist capitalist dictatorship.

                • NotLemming@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  I hope so! I mean the left should be united against Russia but that’s not what I’m seeing, sadly.

              • bishbosh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Are you comparing the political actions of the only ostensibly anti-fascist party in the US to the leftist infighting of posters online? Try organizing with leftists outside and you might be able to see the difference.

                • NotLemming@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  It’s kinda difficult to criticise those in power from the left when there aren’t any. Is there even 1 communist politician in th UK or america?

                  People, including us now, talk online and share their views. I’m sure the same would play out in person as it does online. Maybe luckily, some political ideologies seem to ban any criticism by banning anyone from their spaces who aren’t on board with their agenda. So that at least saves on talking to people who aren’t interested in talking to others, only pushing their propaganda.

        • stroz@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’d like to add:

          Not going after the Confederate states

          to this list

      • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        Amen. 4 years to build a case? January 6th, spend 6-12 months and file charges. What the fuck were they doing for 4 years?

      • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The Oligarchy will never convict one of their own. For four years, I said it was the dog and pony show. And in the end, nothing will happen to Trump. Here we are.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Or at least the second the supreme court said whatever the president does is legal as long as it’s an “official act”.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Harris made choices. She could have chosen not to adopt every single one of Bidens policies. What was biden going to do, fire her? If you look back at her presidential run she really struggled to articulate any policies back then too.

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        What was biden going to do, fire her

        If the reports are true, yes that seems to be the case. I’m not really sure what would have happened, but she was absolutely threatened into defending Biden’s legacy.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago

          The president cannot fire the vice president.
          The best a president can do is lock the VP out of meetings. Bidens approval ratings were so low, being locked out of meetings would have cost her nothing. So exactly what reports are you quoting here, lets see them. I think you made that up.

          • 0ops@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Bidens approval ratings were so low, being locked out of meetings would have cost her nothing.

            Hell, if that happened and we assumed that anti-establishment sentiment is what got trump elected, maybe she could’ve capitalized on that to win the election as a “new” type of politician, one willing to go against the Democrat establishment whom literally everybody hates and dig up the potential dem voters who haven’t had hope for change since Obama. Of course, this is Kamala Harris we’re talking about, probably one of the last politicians that I’d expect to pull a move like that.

    • Kalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      A cascade of failures. Beyond Joe not man enough GTFO, the DNC once again anointed a letter instead of letting the public decide. yes, Joe should never have run for a second term. Given that he did, he should have dropped out sooner. Given that he didn’t, the DNC should have had an open convention rather than putting their thumbs on the scale in back room deals.

      Tim is 100% right that we would not be in this mess if they had won, but when is the DNC going to stop trying to manipulate everything and lie to us about it? They are to blame as much as Repugnacans.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Because they and R are same team. I bet it’s like lawyers who viciously go after each other in court, them have golf and martinis on weekends.

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Biden made an appropriate decision to back out. He should have done it much sooner. But I’m not sure I would characterize the failings of Harris/Walz as Biden’s fault. I don’t really feel that’s fair.

      Harris’ main draw was that she didn’t want to do anything, which pissed off progressives. She was pro-establishment and pro-status quo. She didn’t need Biden’s help to not get votes… I have no love for Biden, but the truth is the truth.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        But I’m not sure I would characterize the failings of Harris/Walz as Biden’s fault.

        Inasmuch as they ran as a continuation of his policy, I’d say there’s some blame to be had.

        • Xanza@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          So you’re saying that two adults chose to run an unpopular and non-working Biden “plan” which was proven to not work, and that’s also Bidens fault because two completely unrelated people decided to also use that plan?

          Does your brain not work?

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                If biden hadn’t been such a mildewy dishrag of a president, his VP might have won. Now insult me more since it’s all centrists do when people expect better of them.

                • Xanza@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  And again this is about you hating Biden. Which is fine, hate him. But how long are you going to blame everything on him like a petulant child?

                  Next week when you stub your toe you’re going to blame him?

                  His Vice President chose to run for office. She chose the platform that she chose to run with. It wasn’t Joe Biden’s platform it wasn’t even loosely tangential to Joe Biden’s platform. But it’s his fault in your eyes because you feel that she stole his platform…

                  Go back and reread my anecdote about the police. You made it even more relevant.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump.

      Biden shares a lot of the responsibility, but Harris and Walz were running on fundamentally faulty assumptions.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is on anyone who was within arms reach of Trump in the last decade and didn’t take matters into their own hands.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Yeah a bunch of people want to make excuses for 90 million people who just… Didn’t think it was important who won.

        Campaign was flawed but if people showed up to vote against fascism we wouldn’t be here. And there’s zero excuse for all 90 million of them to not show up.

        Edit- well, Im reading your post in a different light but, yes that too.

    • NotLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They probably realised Harris wasn’t going to win due to the amount of prejudice and thought Biden had a better chance against trump (who they’d have guessed would have been axed after his loss and criminality, but it was a cult), but then they let Biden to abdicate because there was truth in the criticism of him and the media ran with it…

      At that point who else could they run? It was bad planning, not accounting for Biden’s age/health and the cult of trump.

      Also they should have given Bernie his shot. They didn’t want real change and it’s been forced on them anyway, but now to the detriment of all.