What’s great about this, and Stephen Fry is brilliant, is not that he’s absolving Musk, or that he’s criticizing Tesla, but that it is an argument likely leading to Elon Musk protesting,

‘No, my cars are good enough that I can be a Nazi!’

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    If Elon isn’t a full-blown Nazi, he’s at minimum a Nazi sympathizer. His actions at the inauguration proved where his allegiances lie.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’d imagine Jeremy Clarkson might have said this on old top gear before he outed himself as a massive asshole.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The cybertruck is exactly the sort of thing Nazis would come up with. It’s the King Tiger of trucks - impressive specs and appeals to insecure men, but way the fuck too big and designed for unrealistic situations instead of practical reality.

    • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I, as of recently, live in a place where I actually see those things driving around (and a lot of other trucks). They look like children’s toys compared to the absolute monster fords and some other trucks (not to mention they really do age like milk from what I’ve seen). Some of these behemoths can’t even fit in a single parking spot, it’s kind of insane. One of those would be more deserving of this title I think (I don’t know cars so I can’t say any specific models I’m afraid)

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      It can’t realistically tow heavy loads cause the hitch breaks off, and it can’t travel far with heavy loads. Definitely not the king tiger of trucks.

    • dx1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I think RAMs or similar win in that category by being as actively harmful as possible. And having the huge blindspot where you run over kids without noticing.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Before King Tiger and Tiger they had a few very good tanks.

      Just when T-34 (which were clearly superior to German tanks once some bugs were ironed out, different class even) production went out of control, Hitler started making more decisions involved in what kind of machines is going to be developed and built.

  • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Not apologizing and then immediately giving a speech to AfD about not being ashamed of “cultural purity” beg to differ. Either way, him being an actual Nazi is irrelevant. There are 2 options:

    1. He is an actual Nazi and believes in the ideology, which makes him a fucking Nazi. It should be noted that his grandfather was an extremely anti-semitic politician who moved to South Africa because he admired Apartheid…

    2. He did it as a troll. In which case, at a POTUS inauguration he decided to behave like a teenage boy as the richest man in the world and make light of something that saw 6 million Jews slaughtered and remains as a threat to the security of Jews around the world to this day. Which makes him a colossal piece of shit.

      • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah, I’m sure Cybertruck was the example of him messing around in a 3d modeling software and then saying to Tesla engineers “make a car out of this”. There’s no other excuse for the lack of thought in its outer design.

        • Jericho_Kane@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean design aside, there is no reason to make it this shit, even if it looks bad. It’s just a rug pull but with cars. There is no way in hell you see one of these driving around in 10 years, except some rare cases of garage queens. The car had a pre-order system for fucks sake. The selling point of the car is that: “in an apocalypse, you can just drive over other cars.” Which says a lot about the clientele of that thing.

        • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          He said sexual abuse victims should grow up and stop feeling sorry for themselves.

          He jumped on the "I’m a Jew " bandwagon, in order to deflect criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza. This is after presenting as atheist for all of his public life.

          Anti trans JK Rowling supporter.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Goddammit. Why is no celebrity available to like anymore? I guess it’s true, we should not idolize anyone. Everyone is a piece of shit in some way or another, and to some level.

            Except Keanu Reeves. He’s literally Jesus Christ. ❤️🔥😭

          • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            To put the video in short: Essentially gets asked if he still supports Stonewall even though they support trans kids and speak out against TERFs (worded much differently) and he says no I don’t support them any more, calling it nonsensical, shameful, and sad.

          • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            See what I enjoy about this comment is all things considered there’s a high likelihood you will live past the age of 60 at which point I hope younger people then call you a piece of shit on the daily simply because of your age. LOL

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              The probability is that, as you age, your ability to change you attitudes in order to keep up will slow down to the point where you will seem regressive and problematic to 20yo children when you are 60.

              The era that my parents grew up in would seem awful to most people now, but my parents were unaware that there were problems, and they have a hard time seeing a lot of them now.

            • teslasaur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t know about you, but that sounds miserable. And what makes you think that you will be excluded?

  • comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    2 days ago

    Headlines are being headlines, I get it, but Fry was repeating a joke:

    “I heard a very good joke yesterday,” the QI host, 67, told Stig Abell on Times Radio on Thursday.

    “Someone said, ‘Musk is not a Nazi… Nazis made really good cars,’” he went on, before bursting out laughing.

  • droplet6585@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    200
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hur hur. I’d wish people would stop assigning hyper-competence to Nazis. They never were. Hitler was a drug addict and the trains didn’t run on time.

    • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      138
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly this. My grandmother lived under the Nazis and she said they were fucking idiots. Exactly the same type of incompetent blowhards. The whole hyper scientific ubermensch BS in the cultural zeitgeist is so frustrating. I blame all the WWII video games and movies that played up the myth to have more interesting villains than the sleazy shit stains that they actually were.

      • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        My Oma survived WWII and the bastard Nazis. Opa , was a Wehrmacht Landser, survived the Eastern Front, including Stalingrad, and was later KIA at Monte Cassino. He warned Oma, while on leave from the Eastern Front, that we are going to lose war and you better head west when the Russians enter Germany. She was 3-days ahead of them, just missed the Dresden bombings and somehow survived the Battle of Berlin. Now the USA has the same incompetent blowhards running the USA straight into the ground. She warned me it could happen anywhere and she was 100% correct.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 days ago

        The strength of the Germans was that I.) they had a really good industrial base, and ii.) the traditions within the army meant they had extremely well trained soldiers. Both of these predate nazi-rule. For instance, Germans also arguably had the best (equipped) army in WW1.

        • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Early Nazis also galvanized a young working force with actual socialist policies that guaranteed them good jobs and housing (before Hitler’s multiple violent party purges, scrapping most of it for a fascist-capitalist junta)

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not entirely. You should read the scathing after action reports from Wehrmacht generals who lead the Polish campaign. Basically, they wanted to postpone all offensive operation for at least 3 years because of the high armor losses and correct the deficiencies. The fucktard, Hitler, sent his best generals to desk jobs and replaced them with yes people to continue the war. This is what Bush did during the build up against Iraq and Afghanistan and exactly what Orange Nero wants to do too.

          • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Two things can be true at the same time. German soldiers were incredibly cruel in non-combat situations, and at the same time highly competent in combat.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        I blame all the WWII video games and movies that played up the myth to have more interesting villains than the sleazy shit stains that they actually were.

        I guess Wolfenstein being banned for glorifying Nazis actually had some merit.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hitler was a drug addict and the trains didn’t run on time.

      German trains still don’t run on time. Can’t blame that one on the Nazis, that’s just a German thing.

          • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s kinda bullshit. Like, yeah, 30 Minutes delay on an ICE Journey aren’t necessarily uncommon, but with distances where the ICE makes sense, they’re usually faster than driving, and a traffic jam underway that delays you by about that isn’t all that unlikely on those distances either.

            With more local transport, it usually runs on time for me, and I use it almost daily. Might vary by region, though.

          • Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sounds like one of those people who prefer standing in a 20 minute traffic jam instead of giving a chance to public transit. If you actually use the german trains from time to time, you will notice how well used they are. They are admittedly often late though.

          • yonder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            In Canada, we have Via rail. They line you up like you’re at an airport and check your ticket before you board the train, and also check your ticket once you’re on the train. They also have enforced weight restrictions on baggage. The trains share tracks with freight, meaning that the train has to stop every once in a while to let a freight train pass. All this to take longer than driving and cost alot as well.

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          I had four long distance ICE journeys in the last two months. Three where thirty minutes late, one was two hours late.

          Also had four long distance TGV journeys, of which one was about 20 minutes late, and one was an hour late, though that delay happened in Germany.

          Apparently, DB is currently working on the infrastructure, but those renovations haven’t been fully funded, and it looks like the conservatives will get in next.

          • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            DB AG should hire the Japanese who operate the Shinkansen network or scrap the privatization and bring back Deutsche Bundesbahn.

            • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I think the Japanese are going to Britain next. There was something about it on a Marketplace (NPR) episode recently I think.

          • Windows2000Srv@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            On Via Rail Canada, my train trip was 3h. The delay was 3h. So it literally was double the amount of time.

            European train delay is nothing compared to Canadian train delay.

            • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              German train delays ≠ European delays. Grmany’s puctuality rate is 70% while Spain, which you could stereotype as being “mediterraneanly” lax is over 91%.

              Germany and UKs networks are a sad joke. Most of Europe has very good puncutality

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That’s just ignoring history. There are plenty of good reasons to hate the Nazis without needing to do that.

      In the similar way, it’s not necessary to dismiss Soviet Union’s early modernization successes in order to blame them for their crimes against humanity.

      • droplet6585@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Dismiss what? Fascism is catabolic. They can’t build anything. They can only loot until they run out of victims.

        The projections of hyper competence and secret knowledge are part of their branding.

        Stop being a fascist apologist.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Honestly, this shit needs to stop. Acknowledging that some fascists have been good at something at some point does not detract in any way from being anti-fascist.

          If you claim that fascist are dumb, stupid and can achieve nothing, what do you think the masses will think about your message when the fascists turn out to be competent? They will wonder what other things you are wrong about.

          So I say to you: stop being a fascist enabler.

          • droplet6585@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            claim that fascist are dumb, stupid and can achieve nothing

            I seem to have struck a nerve. I wonder why this bothers you so much?

            Fascists are great at: bullshitting, terrorizing and thieving. Fascism is catabolic. It is organized crime with the aesthetic of a political movement.

            Obviously that’s not the image they present to population of the regions they take. But you knew what I was claiming they are incompetent at.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is why the left can’t have nice things.

      Like this isn’t the point here. You don’t need to be pointing out this stuff. Just dog pile

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      2 days ago

      A small country took on the ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD (TWICE) and very nearly won. The second time with a lunatic at the helm.

      What does it take to impress you? To what would you assign their disturbing success?

      • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Lmao “very nearly won” is when you start a war your logistical staff and planning department tell you you have no way of winning. But yeah it’s really impressive how they could keep going for a bit over two years just by the grit of their teeth and millions of slaves worked to death.
        You’ve been fooled by nazi propaganda lol.

      • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        To what would you assign their disturbing success?

        I have to ask: What success? They did typical fascist bullshit: They had an economy so bad they had to invade new countries just to loot them to pay for their horrific economy. They picked fight after fight of the smallest kids in the neighbourhood they could find until they met those kids big brothers and sisters. They required fucking slave labour to try to meet their wartime goals because they grossly underestimated just about every single facet of running a country. They privatized state-owned industries, crippling longterm wealth for their people, they instituted tariffs (sound familiar?). Pay remained as bad as they it had been in the depression because while their wages were raised, they were forced to constantly work overtime for no additional pay. Their military was the majority of their economic spending, and they used deficit spending because they were going to literally plunder the countries around them to pay for it. Sound like solid long-term planning? They killed or jailed anyone in the trade unions, and due to their insane tariffs and you know, generally being the worst people in history, lacked incoming trade so things like poultry or clothing was in short supply for the average person.

        Then it took thirty five days for the Nazi German army, along with the Serbian and Soviet armies, to conquer Poland. For every success in the early war they had embarrassing fumbles. They lost entirely because of how fascists work: they need to invade more countries to pay for their insane military spending, make bigger and bigger enemies, then get beat by those enemies, then later people claim they ‘could have if…’

        Yeah, they could have done just fine if they hadn’t been fascist. All of their failings fall to being fascist.

        And the first world war, are you kidding me? Are you seriously suggesting their insistence on investing in overseas colonies while fighting against the British was a brilliant plan? In both wars they were led by colossal morons who constantly underestimated their opponents, while in the second world war in particular having the worst spy agency of any nation. Their insistence on torturing, raping, and murdering everyone they came into contact with meant they just got the answers they wanted to hear, instead of the actual truth, and were constantly on the back foot. Their evil, cruel, and twisted nature was their own downfall; the insistence of their superiority, as you are doing now, is the very reason they failed.

      • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Incredible. Literally everything you just said was wrong.

        Germany wasn’t “a small country”. They were an industrialised, highly productive and heavily armed global power. They were slightly battered by post ww1 humiliation regulations pressed on them by the winners (because they ALSO lost that one!). But the instant they told the Allies to eat shit and started using what they had, any claim to “smallness” went out the window.

        And they didn’t “almost win”. They got their asses kicked.

        Every single thing the Nazis wanted to achieve, they failed hard. They wanted to prove the genetic superiority of the German people in the Olympics, instead they were soundly beat. They wanted to expand their territory, they got as far as fucking Poland and France and then stalled for years until a double whammy of Americans and Russians basically curb-stomped them, with the last few years of the Reich consisting of lots of propaganda coping hard about how their soon to come wonder weapons would turn the tide, which never happened because said wonder weapons were stupid ideas that only succeeded at getting more Nazis killed when they failed in testing. They wanted to stop the spread of communism, instead half their country became Soviet domain.

        And then their “strongman” leader blasted his own brains out rather than face the fact that he was a loser in every way one can be a loser.

      • droplet6585@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        80
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Small country? They were a highly industrialized, highly educated and still quite materially wealthy colonial power going into the wars. They didn’t need to be competent. Enough people went along with them and there was plenty of residual wealth to burn on the war machine.

        You don’t need to be an architect to burn down a building.

        • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Germany didn’t really have much wealth after WW1 due to the restrictions placed on them from the western powers.

          Most of the reason the Nazi party was popular early on was them championing a number of socialist policies designed to bring the country out an economic morass.

          This is a really good book on the subject (and part of a really good trilogy of books about understanding Nazi Germany): https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/319473.The_Coming_of_the_Third_Reich

          • droplet6585@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            I get what you’re trying to get at. But I’m talking the developed material wealth of a region. Actual physical infrastructure like rails, mines, factories, universities and everyone with the required education and training to run all of it.

            If the victors of the first war received the dividends of that real infrastructure- that matters right up until the moment that they don’t anymore.

            • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              You do realize Germany lost 48% of it’s industrial territory in the treaty of Versailles, right?

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nazis took on world in one war, and lost.

        “WE ARE THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD! THE PUREST OF THE PURE! STRONGEST OF THE STRONG!”

        [Fights one (1) war]

        “Guess we’ll shoot ourselves in a bunker and lose in a big lopsided defeat.”

      • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        2 days ago

        To what would you assign their disturbing success?

        Material support from the Western ruling class who wanted Hitler to destroy communism for them.

        • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          2 days ago

          This, the biggest mistake Germany made was interfering with dominant western European capital (i.e. the US, UK, and France). If they had just devoured the eastern European countries and fought Russia then capital would not have batted an eye.

      • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        At no point were the Nazis close to winning. After the Soviets won the battle of Stalingrad in 1943 the Nazis were on full retreat until Berlin got captured.

        Even leading up to up 1943, Germany had its oil nearly cut off. They became dependent on Romania for their supply. This may sound like a cartoon, but Nazis were dragging their tanks to the frontline using horses.

        Germany simply did not have the industrial or logistic capacity to win WW2 at any point. The Nazis had already ransacked the German economy through privatization reforms and selling off anything that wasn’t nailed down. Invading Poland incurred a bunch of sanctions and embargos that resulted in Germany’s only primary oil trade coming from uhhh…the Soviet Union, so the Nazis had the brilliant idea of declaring war on their main source of gasoline.

        • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          they lost in the fall/winter of 41, when they failed to take moscow and collapse the soviet union. after that, they had no strategic path to victory. so long as the soviets could sustain morale and keep fighting, germany was lost. they did not have the material means to win the war, never mind the triumph of will shit.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think that they were winning before they invaded the Soviet-Union.

          In an alternate timeline where they kept the alliance with the USSR, I think they would have won.

          The USSR had resources while Germany had engineers and technology.

          And without an eastern Front, they could have held off the allies on the western front.

          But they got cocky, paranoid and greedy.

          And I am glad they lost.

          • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            “The alliance” 🙄 in that alternative reality they’d have been merked by the USSR once the red army had been reorganized.

            Also “if they didn’t invade the USSR” is such a stupid take. Sure, but the whole reason the Nazis came to power was to fight their idea of “judeo bolshevism” and invading the east for “lebensraum”. Hitler was deadset on destroying the soviet union. You’re basically saying “if the Nazis weren’t Nazis they would have won.” Which, yeah, maybe, but if they weren’t Nazis would they even have started the war? No way to know.
            Completely ahistorical dipshit take.

            Here’s two videos that are easy enough to watch Germany could not win wwii and Germany could not win wwii part two

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        At no point did they “nearly win” against the world. In World War 1 they made desperate attempts to break out of trench warfare because the blockade was obliterating their wartime economy. In World War 2 they were cooked the second they invaded the USSR and the USA landed in the UK. Those were unwinnable areas for them. Even if they eventually managed to wear down the British, the Americans were right behind them manufacturing 100 tanks a day and 15 Aircraft Carriers in 1943 alone. Which means all of those tanks are getting to the European theater.

        And once the USSR got it’s production under way the Germans were on the defensive all the way back to Berlin.

      • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Germany was always the second strongest imperial power in Europe behind Britain from 1871 onwards, and without the English channel that would be debatable.

        The Nazis’ initial success in WW2 is entirely dependent on France falling apart the second they were invaded and the Reich getting to loot the entirety of it and the low countries to keep their economy alive. Had France put up even token resistance Germany would have imploded within a few months and the European half of the war would’ve been a minor footnote in the history books next to Japan invading all of Asia.

      • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What does it take to impress you? To what would you assign their disturbing success?

        Meth chocolate, fascism, and taking on armies using WWI tech and tactics

          • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I guess they were a bit better than France when it came to how to use tanks and the whole “allowing leaders on the ground to take the initiative” but that’s about it.

          • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yup, biggest thing is that their attack, though expected by quite a few powers, came out of left field and add in the rushing forward on armies still using cavalry units and the early massive land grab via Germany makes sense

        • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I was arguing that there was a terrible war, and the enemy was dangerous and capable. Many of our and other country’s soldiers died to destroy them, and it wasn’t easy.

          They weren’t “Colonel Klink” from “Hogan’s Heroes”, they were efficient at killing, rounding up and killing millions while fighting on a number of fronts.

          My grandfather fought in World war I, and my uncles fought in World war II. From what I heard the Germans were not incompetent bumbling idiots. They were a very competent and difficult enemy.

          I don’t know what history everybody’s been reading, but there sure as heck are some major changes to history interpretation that have taken place in the last 40-50 years. Probably peer-to-peer instruction, rather than accounts from those who endured it

          • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ok fair enough, I accept the explanation you provided. Folks are taking issue with the following comment in particular.

            What does it take to impress you? To what would you assign their disturbing success?

            In isolation, this sounds a little too close to admiration for the Nazis, which is why we got some reports about it. It seems to me it’s just unfortunate phrasing, because together with the explanation you just provided, it sounds like a reasonable take for you not to want to paint them like some hapless foe that was easily defeated, because that discounts the difficulties faced by those who fought the bastards.

            • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I wanted to clarify, but there were so many comments coming in, I didn’t see how I could do it effectively. And not seem like I was what some people thought I was

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do Japan and Italy just not count as part of the world? I mean Japan took over half of Asia and the Pasific while Italy took the Mediterranean countries. Germany took over part of northern Europe and helped a bit of North Africa.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Still a Nazi.

    Just America shrinkflated Nazism so the intelligence had to go. Still 100% of the hate and malice America loves to eat though.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes. He’s still a Nazi. You’re not getting the point.

      Fry is trying to provoke Musk into saying, “yes, they’re good enough,” turning it an admission that he is indeed a Nazi.