Harris only received five percent of Republican votes — less than the six percent Joe Biden won in 2020 when he beat Trump, as well as the seven percent won by Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she lost to him. While Harris won independents and moderates, she did so by smaller margins than Biden did in 2020.

Meanwhile, Harris lost households earning under $100,000, while Democratic turnout collapsed. Votes are still being counted, but Harris is on pace to underperform Biden’s 2020 totals by millions of votes.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Yes. When you abandon the left, they don’t vote for you. This is what Clinton did too

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      They have clearly internalized the pervasive trope that leftists will vote for them, because they have no other choice, so the only thing that matters to convince is the right. Looks like they calculated wrong.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Obama got people excited about healthcare reform. Biden got people excited about student debt relief. Clinton tried to get people excited about a female president and Harris centered her campaign around running against Trump.

        Social programs get people excited.

        • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Biden got people excited about student debt relief.

          This is not why Biden got elected. Trump so badly mishandled Covid that everyone left of center demanded change.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            I don’t think you can point to one specific thing that got Biden elected. Covid mismanagement was a huge part of it, but student debt relief and other progressive proposals that Bernie pushed the campaign into played a big part as well. Even with Covid, I think there’s a good chance that Biden would have lost if he’d run the same kind of centrist campaign that Harris and Clinton ran.

          • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            31 minutes ago

            The failure to realize Covid is the only reason Biden won cost the Democrats. In the swing states 2024 Trump beats 2020 Biden by vote count.

        • masinko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Student debt was not a campaign platform he ran on, it was something he did during his presidency.

          He did run on Green New Deal and the original proposal that later became the $2 trillion Infrastructure investment/bill/plan.

          But to your point, yes he ran on platforms that people got excited. Both of those platforms were new economic opportunities for people in a time when people when much of the labor class was jobless from COVID.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My take on this is that the DNC has never understood that to win the presidency in the last 20 years you need to be a fire brand.

    I think this stared in 2008 with Obama who won I believe because he fired up the base with great speeches about hope and change. It didn’t really happen, BUT the man knew how to give a speech. That got people inspired to do something and they voted.

    Bernie was another fire brand - told it like it was and it appealed to a large population.

    trump won using the same idea, but just the opposite of hope and change yet it worked. It tapped into a visceral and deep frustration that this country has left them behind.

    The modern view of the American president to the population is less of a wonky politician and more of a cheerleader for big ideas, even if those ideas are abhorrent and exceedingly horrifying.

    Harris just wasn’t the person to pull this off, she was too wonky and it felt like the entire campaign was playing the old card of “we are not trump” Instead if they really wanted to win they would have found ( 2 years ago) a feisty out spoken progressive leaning firebrand that would have inspired people to vote for something better.

    The only reason that (bland) Biden won was because of how badly trump fucked up the Covid response.

    • Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I think when she was announced as the candidate, she fired up the base just fine. She was different.

      Then she spent the rest of the campaign reassuring people that nothing would change, pissing away that enthusiasm.

      • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        One of the frustrations I had was her solution to the housing problem was to just build more houses and give out some money. Sure great, but what I wanted to hear, and I think many other also wanted to hear, was her talking about corporate hording of housing and what she would do about that situation. But she just ignored it completely and so did Biden.

        I think instead if she came out swinging against corporate greed, even if she actually did nothing about it, would have given her more votes.

        My one hope out of this is that the massive swing to the right will be countered with more vocal progressives.

        • dank@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          She didn’t even really have a plan to build more houses, just some subsidies that wouldn’t put a dent in the problem. She should have proposed something ambitious that people could get excited about. The crazy thing is Biden had some big ambitious policies that he actudlly enacted like the Inflation Reduction Act that dwarf anything Kamala campaigned on. It’s the opposite of a winning approach that sells the stars and delivers the moon.

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Exactly. “I’m not trump” barely got Biden in when trump was the incumbent with covid running rampant. It didn’t work for Clinton in 2016 and unsurprisingly it didn’t work for Harris in 2024. The level of incompetence at the DNC really makes me think the actual goal is to prevent our politics/country from shifting to the left at any cost.

        • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          My feeling is that once the DNC starts to acknowledge the progressive ideas then they open the flood gates to challengers to their (limited) power.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The Dems also need to get it through their skulls that it’s not just trump. The problem was present in McConnell and Gingrich. We need multiple parties willing to work together for the good of all Americans. Unfortunately the democrats are idiots with the policies of a quite reasonable right wing and the republicans are fascists who have spent 30 years rejecting their own ideas when said by democrats

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yeah, the notion that she was going to put a Republican in her cabinet…did anyone think that was a good idea? I mean, outside the beltway media?

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I know every early on she was talking about possibly having a Republican Vice President before she wised up and went with Tim Walz and ran on his progressive ideas for about… three seconds till Nancy and the DNC told her to just do what Hillary did, as that worked for her and Kamela is obviously the second female president right now. /s

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Seeing Walz as her VP pick was such a win and then everything started slipping away. If you listened to her speeches you’d start to notice she was slowly leaning more conservative, slowly backpedaling on a lot of Biden admin policies even. And for some reason she was absolutely obsessed with going on right wing media outlets.

        I genuinely think she’s rather well spoken but what a waste of potential.

        • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I was kind of Lukewarm on Walz initially, but he was super endearing. He was cooking there for a minute and then the DNC muzzled him. I remember the moment he got shut up about the electoral college I thought to myself “annnnd now all of his appeal is gone and he’s just another boring politician”. It was really startling to see how little he actually had to do to get the leash tugged.

  • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t get why it’s hard to comprehend. By becoming (even) more conservative, more “R”, they betrayed (even more of) their base. Why would timid Republicans want to vote for traitors pandering to them?

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not only that, if she’s not targeting Democrats they won’t feel motivated to vote for her. Yes, yes, fascism was the other option. But people are not smart, and I say that as a people.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Shit I was saying when Biden was still running and I got crucified for it.

      As you shift to the right you leave your base behind, ignoring a growing, left swinging faction within the party is going to lead to outcomes like this. Working class people all have the same problems, and one party says they’ll do something about it. They’re lying, people who are generally smarter and paying attention know they’re lying, but that’s not most people.

      The other party has had a chance, and failed to do anything to alleviate the concerns of the working class. Regardless of the circumstances, or their actual ability to affect change. And they spent the entire election cycle trying to curry votes from a dedicated base instead of getting voters excited about something.

      Swing left, swing hard. Become the unhinged leftist the other side is already accusing you of being.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Its a two party system, why would anyone think being a bit more like the other guy be a good idea?

        Why would someone pick knockoff awful when the name brand is right there?

    • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And we won’t have another election again, so these democratic voters who stayed home have denied themselves any other opportunities to right this ship.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Democrats would prefer to lose than become more progressive because the rich and powerful still benefit from Republicans winning or Democrats winning as long as Democrats are still centre-right wing.

      As soon as Democrats move left the elites start to lose so Democrats don’t.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I mean that’s basically what Obama did. It’s what Trump does. If you promise 100% and only give 30% you’ll be remembered as a good or good ish president. 60%+ and you’re the greatest president of all time. But when you promise -10% you’re just not gonna win.

    • Femcowboy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If there is one lesson we should learn, it’s that they don’t care to win. They are owned by the same corporate big wigs as Trump. They’re on the same team, capitalism.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s not so much as that it collapsed as it was artificially inflated in 2020.

    The drive for covid-safe vote by mail turned out far more people in 2020 than 2024 and that helped Biden.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Trump seems to have turned out just as many as before. Plus, I don’t think any of the blue wall states changed their vote by mail policies.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It was the stupidest of ideas. Republicans were never going to vote for her in any numbers. She was all about gun control, she personally owned the 12 million border crossings, she had all those defund the police sound bites from her earlier years, and she couldn’t effectively separate herself from the difficult economy for middle and low earners - while failing to communicate that she even cared about the common man’s plight or would try to help it. Even her proposed tax plan raised taxes on lower middle class, at least the charts I saw (including here on Lemmy). And Republicans have seen four years of Trump and think all the Nazi and “all Republicans are racist” talk is literally the stupidest thing on the earth. Abortion was all Dems really had, and although lots of Republicans are pro-choice, Trump had promised to veto a national abortion ban (for whatever that’s worth).

    I remember when Democrats were for the working people. They need to stop being "We’re not the Nazis"and start telling us who they are. But I don’t think they want to tell us who they are. They’re no longer the party of the working man, they’re the party of corporate interest and global governance, and they’re also almost as authoritarian as the right. Maybe the collapse of the Democrat party will result in the birth of an actual socialist party in the US. We’ve seen major party changes in the past. Will it happen again, soon?

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Ding ding ding! Trump went further right and got more support. DNC should go further left. People want radical change in 2024

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The Republicans had their little tea party a few years ago. The Democrats need a Guillotine Party to properly represent us.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They had the billionaire Koch’s to fund that. We’re never getting a billionaire to fund the leopard party that will eat their faces.

      :(

      • nxn@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, there should have been limits set on campaign costs, lobbying, media, etc. It’s at a point where it doesn’t seem like it’s even possible to have a middle-class focused campaign that can openly say its basis is on taxing the fuck out of the top 1%.

        But all I know is this: the second Trump term will make the standard of life in America far worse for most people. There will be hunger in 2028 for someone to simply say “We’ll fix the middle class, and we’ll make Musk, Bezos, etc pay for it”. Hopefully by then what’s left of twitter will not be as relevant as today, so that the message can at least have a hope of spreading through social media successfully.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I want to be hopeful but I can’t find a logical progression to that stage knowing what the Republicans plan to do and their stranglehold on popular social media. The population will continue to be brainwashed into thinking Trump gives a shit and see him helping while also being told right wing Democrats are communists…

          No one else stands a chance when we have corporate media or right wing social media as our options. I know there was a socialist candidate this cycle and Lemmy was literally the only place I saw her.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The Tea Party forced the GOP to rebrand and restructure itself around the most extreme right wing ideas possible

      Occupy Wallstreet tried to do the same thing, and… were savagely beaten by the police over it.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Because the Tea Party was useful to just make the Republicans more unapologetically anti-government (something rich people like) while Occupy was demanding that Democrats become unapologetically antagonistic to rich people.

  • ModestMeme@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    17 hours ago

    So left wing Democrats responded by sitting on their hands instead of voting, knowingly allowing the country to slide into whatever authoritarian hellhole that awaits us? Now that’s the definition of pettiness.

    • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I seriously doubt left wingers were the difference in this election. I doubt there are significant enough numbers of far left people in Georgia, North Carolina, Michigan, and Wisconsin for it to have made any real difference.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      For many, actively supporting Israeli genocide is something they simply can’t support.

      If there’s anything that this election has proven, it’s that there are A LOT of one issue voters in this country, across the board. They’ll ignore everything else for the one issue they care about above all else. And when you only have two viable parties, that forced a black and white decision.

      The fundamental solution is eradicating First Past the Post and getting ranked choice voting so we have a multitude of parties that are all more nuanced instead.

      But that won’t happen unless we abandon both of the major parties we have now, and they can’t let that happen because that means they lose power.

      • ModestMeme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        What is Trump’s stated opinion on Israel and its war in Gaza? What is Trump’s stated opinion -and first term actions- on Muslims? Seriously, the Biden & Harris = “genocide” horseshit was 100% designed to disenfranchise Democrats. Congress votes on foreign aid. Congress is largely Republican. Protesters NEVER went after Republicans.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Oh 100%. But if there’s anything this election proved, it’s that the average American is fucking stupid, gullible as shit, and unable to determine propaganda from reality.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yeah, and the problem is people just kind of stop at “they’re dumb” like that’s just the end of it. “They’re dumb and our opponents are unscrupulous so we’ll never win until dumbness is eradicated”. It’s an influence campaign. Figure out a way to make the dumb people want to vote for you! The dumb people exist, some of them vote, and others could probably be encouraged to vote who don’t.

            No ad agency would stay in business by saying “sorry, we didn’t get you any extra sales, but it’s not our fault because the consumers are dumb, and also you should hire us to do it all over again next time because our failure was the absolute best that could have been done under the circumstances”.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          So why are the democrats currently taking part in genociding Palestinians? Thats horseshit too?

          Is anything stopping them from being vocally opposed to the situation?

          Both candidates messaging was they would “get the war over with” but I guess it sounds better coming from Kamala than Trump?

    • b34k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yes, my friend was one of them. I was shocked when 2 weeks before election he told me he was planning on not voting.

      I asked why and he cited holding the same position Isreal as Biden, and courting republicans like Cheney, saying that was not a good look for the party at all.

      I told him it’s not ideal, but we need to vote to keep Trump out…. Sometimes we just have to be pragmatic.

      He responded saying it’s the Dem establishment that keeps allowing a boogey man like Trump to rise so they can shove center right corporatists down our throats. He said he was abstaining from voting to send a message to the DNC, and followed it up with, “we survived a first Trump term, I’m sure we can survive a second.”

      • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Funny thing is your friends opinions are popular on lemmy.ml which makes it seem like foreign actors are pushing these talking points. They definitely worked in Trumps favor.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Now the blue MAGA is talking about the election being stolen…

          Seriosuly how did you expect to win against Trump by copying Trump? People always chose the original authoritarian nazi asshole over the knock-off copy.

          You know what wouldnt have worked in Trumps favor? Stopping the genocide in Gaza. That would have led to a landslide victory for the Dems.

          • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Now the blue MAGA is talking about the election being stolen…

            What is this supposed to mean? Who is the blue maga?

            Who is suggesting coping Trump?

            The polls show voters were motivated by inflation. As much as I’d like the people of Palestine to not be safe and thrive, I literally don’t know anyone irl that considered that when voting. But the way it is pushed on lemmy you’d think it is Iran voting for Americas next president.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That would have led to a landslide victory for the Dems.

            Honestly, probably not really. It’d have likely led to a closer election by winning them Michigan, but the Democrats had a more fundamental problem than very unpopular foreign policy.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        He responded saying it’s the Dem establishment that keeps allowing a boogey man like Trump to rise so they can shove center right corporatists down our throats. He said he was abstaining from voting to send a message to the DNC, and followed it up with, “we survived a first Trump term, I’m sure we can survive a second.”

        I remember when I was 14.

        • b34k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yeah, I am definitely in the camp that Trump part 2 will be worse…. but we don’t know for sure yet

          • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Keep in mind Trump is pushing 80 and has a steady diet of McDonalds and Diet Coke. Here’s to hoping nature takes its course.

              • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Better isn’t the word I would use. I don’t think Vamce ilcould be the cult leader Trump is. I think when Trump dies it will at least take some time to build up another cult leader.

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I honestly don’t know. He’s not as viscerally mean as Trump, but he’s also a lot smarter. I think some part of him is a fancy boy who wants to be liked and to win by being clever and insightful rather than just brutal. He used to write about his nice life in San Francisco doing community gardening. If he could get the upper-crust to like him (not just use him) that seems like something he’d enjoy.

                But then again, he sold out to the guy he thought was Hitler, so he might just be completely without shame or conscience.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        we survived a first Trump term

        As long as you weren’t one of the million Americans who died of COVID thanks to his misadministration.

        Or the Capitol police who died as a result from his attempted insurrection.

        • b34k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I mean, he’s an ex-pat who was living in Hong Kong, S Korea, and Vietnam for most of Trumps first term… so I’m sure he didn’t feel it as hard as most of us who were here for it.

          • Jerkface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            “Thousands of my countrymen will perish, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make.”

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              It’s a mistake reasoning as if you’re taking of one guy. Maybe one third of your population voted, and most of those voted for Trump, it means that most of you guys are pretty ok with dying during the next COVID or whatever

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I don’t agree with him, but I think he’s expecting them to support liberal progressive policies. Seems to be taking the stance of “if we can’t improve things it’s better to watch it all burn rather than slowly rot”.

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Tell him that not voting to convince them to run liberal progressive policies won’t work. You can’t play Mexican standoff because the Dems have an out: the center voters.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  What exactly do you think should have been done differently for Harris to activate this “just win with centrists” option? Because it very much seems like that was just tried and failed miserably.

            • orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I’m not OP so I don’t actually know him so I can’t tell him anything, although I do know one person like that. As for your point I’m not sure that actually follows since those center voters didn’t show up to save Harris this time. If the DNC keeps losing elections at some point, assuming we’re all still here and we even still have elections, they will have to try something different. It’s a very risky play but I also can’t say it won’t work.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                Harris relied on the left showing up for their rights and for democracy. That was a ton of her campaign. And the left didn’t show up. If they don’t show up for that, they won’t show up for anything. They will try something different and that’s going all in on the center voter, who actually show up.

                • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  You’re right. I don’t buy this narrative that the dems lost because they were left enough. The polls show voters were motivated by inflation and thought Biden’s progressive policies were to blame.

                • orclev@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 hours ago

                  I replied to your other comment where you said basically the same thing, but the short version is there clearly isn’t enough center voters for that to be a winning strategy. If they try that next election (If there even is a next election) it’s going to be an even more lopsided victory for the Republicans.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Well Biden for example could’ve done a much better job actually persecuting prosecuting him for his crimes. He can do that as the head of the Executive branch.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        “we survived”

        Many didn’t and even more won’t this time, your friend is a genocide supporter

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          So not voting for genocidal candidates now make genocide support? stop projecting.

          The Dems were hellbent on supporting gneocide. People chose to be fine with it, even attacking people who called it out.

          The flak we got here for saying for months the Dems need to stop the genocide support to win the election now raises the question whether they were just tactically wrong, or whether they werent really into the genocide themselves. That would explain why now there is efforts to project it on the other people.

          At every turn we were told that supporting genocide is better than supporting genocide and homophobia. Saying we should push for a non genocidal candidate, for which there was plenty of time at first, got immediately shut down.

          The most consistent position of the Biden/Harris fans was to accept genocide, because that was the strongest criticism raised consistently against them. Now you end up not only having lost the election but having lost the election because you were in support of genocide.

          It is no wonder that Trump managed to win, when the center is so morally bankrupt. It is no wonder that there was no way to inspire people to vote for Harris and Biden if the messaging constantly was “yeah we are morally bankrupt and we are also genociders and racists, but we are less than the other side. This is as good as we allow to happen”.

          This is on the Democrat elites and their supporters. Own up to it instead of projecting the blame.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Democrats: Support Israel, say they want the conflict to stop and a two States solution. Want to send weapons to Ukraine. Support minorities in the US.

            Republicans: Support the genocide of Palestinians, of Ukrainians and of minorities inside the USA.

            Voting for Republicans and not voting (so leaving the door open to them) is supporting genocide.

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              So every Israel aka genocide supporter had a safe vote with Trump. Everyone who opposes it had no choice with either party.

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m not one of them, I voted a month or so in advance by mail.

      But I wonder if some people are tired of the lack of change with Democrats in charge and believe that things need to get worse before they can get better.

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        As “hardcore-left” as I am, I just cannot fathom, being so dumb to not vote “to show the dems”. The policies of bad Republican presidents hurt us till today. Think about Reagan vastly accelerating the gap between rich and poor, or Nixon with his failed war drugs.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They all campaigned for Harris and mostly held their criticism to themselves. Harris is the one who decided to go campaign with Liz Cheney and Mark Cuban.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This election was lost in every measurable way. She did not lose because of leftists who didn’t vote on principal. She lost because the working class overwhelmingly chose not to vote for her. Many of them voted for Trump instead. Many first-time voters voted for Trump. She thoroughly lost to him in every possible way.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Pretty much, although it’s probably an exaggeration to call them Democrats. In reality most of them are likely unaffiliated with any party. But it was literally Harris’s job to convince them to come out and vote for her and she failed at it. When a candidate loses an election, barring election interference, it’s their fault. Harris fucked us all by running as a diet Republican. Odds are anyone in here reading this did everything we could to hand her the win, but she pissed it all away by trying to steal votes from the Republicans instead of convincing people that they needed to get off their asses and come vote for her.

      • ifGoingToCrashDont@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Dude, she had like 100 days to put together a campaign. She had to make a gamble and trust that the 2020 Dem voters were already in her corner so she could go after some big fish with the little time she had.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          She got handed a losing Biden campaign that was on fire, and thought the smart move was to double down on his policies that were already losing him the election, and then to throw in some Republican talking points. It was very obviously a losing strategy no matter how little time she had. The Democrats have been relying on “not Republicans” to carry them to victory for so long they seem to have forgotten why people vote for them over the Republicans.

        • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Dude, lets be real. The only reason the DNC pushed Biden out of the way was because polling numbers said the incumbent advantage (and his policies) weren’t going to be enough to win it for him. So Kamala comes out of the gate with a boost (because she’s not Joe) and promptly proclaims she can’t name a single policy decision she would have made differently than Biden. That’s not winning undecided voters from either side.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            and promptly proclaims she can’t name a single policy decision she would have made differently than Biden.

            Literally not true. Were you just not paying attention?

            • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Shortly after becoming candidate, she was asked in an interview if she could think of anything she would have done different than Biden. She replied:

              “There is not a thing that comes to mind… and I’ve been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact, the work that we have done,”

              I voted for Harris but I think that was a monumental fuckup.

                • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Ok… But that’s not what we are talking about is it? You said the statement ‘and promptly proclaims she can’t name a single policy decision she would have made differently than Biden.’ was “Literally not true”. But it literally is.

                  I don’t have the time nor the want to unpack the rest of this clusterfuck campaign.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Sorry dude, the problem is well beyond “leftists” and sooner or later you’ll need to confront that.

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They did, but it isn’t great knowing how much better they are than you? We can at least take comfort in their “moral high ground” even though they let a guy who explicitly stated he wanted to be a dictator become president.

    • IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      The average voter mindset is “which president will get me cheaper food?”

      My parents get fed propaganda from Wechat (yes that Chinese app) saying democrats are letting too much illegal immigrants in, taking up too much resources.

      We are legal immigrants, but shes doesn’t see “illegal immigrant” is a dogwhistle about all immigrants that they dont like like black or brown people, or anyone they deem inferior.

      Doesnt help the fact that Eric Adams and NYC democrats are building homeless shelters near Chinese American population.

      My parents told me some of our relatives in NYC voted Trump, Asian Americans voting trump.

      They say some Asian American co-workers at their workplace are supporting Trump.

      My parent say “Its fine, we survived one term under trump”

      Everyone who’s a US Citizen in our household voted Kamala Harris. We tried. Our state PA still went red.

      My US Citizen mom once said, “maybe we shouldn’t vote for democrats, look at what they did in NYC (refering to homeless shelters)”, and I reminded her about the Chinese Exclusion Act. So she vote Harris because I told her to. Like she didnt have a mind of her own. If her children turned out to be conservatives, she’d vote trump. Some people just dont care about politics. Similarly, some people have apolitical children but political parents, those children then vote for who their parents vote for.

      We need to fix this voter apathy. Democracy is just broken.

      (oh wow didnt mean to type a paragraph, sorry for the wall of text, election results still enraging me…)

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Honestly unfortunately mostly unrealistic: a systemic chage towards deliberative democracy (not just USAs broken electoral democracy) would be the best according to most political science. It’s (way to) slowly happening in some European states (so the right shift may reverse that trend again). This indirection vie simple voting tends to lean towards populism and manipulation. Which got unfortunately incredibly obvious in the presidential election…

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Blue state examples are often particularly confusing for the politically uninvolved, as Eric Adams is pretty close to a Republican. Once a state gets blue enough, anyone with ambition will just say they’re Democrats and then do center-right stuff. Often the state parties are not ideological enough to deny the brand when it’s just easier to make a bigger and bigger tent of insiders.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Harris relied on the left showing up for their rights and for democracy. But they will literally never show up. This is why the Dems will never, ever rely on the left showing up ever again. Dems will go hard center next election.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I don’t think there’s enough center left for them to go any harder center without going further left. They were already running on a bunch of right wing Republican policies. They’ve only got three options. Go harder right and actually become diet Republicans (all the oligarchy, but only half the fascism!). Stay exactly where they are. Or go left and return to being mildly progressive. They’ve shown that where they are currently is a losing proposition, so realistically their option is to try to appeal to the middle of the Republican base, or walk back some of their right shift of the last few decades. I don’t think they’re going to be able to successfully out Republican the Republicans so they’ve really only got one viable play.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I don’t know how else to say it: Harris relied on the left with abortion rights and saving democracy, and the left didn’t show up. The center cares about inflation and housing, which Harris did not address enough. They will go to that center, Bill Clinton’s “It’s the economy, stupid”. There will be no real progress, just economy for the center.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Left isn’t just social policies, it’s economic policies as well. She should have been talking about inflation and housing this election in addition to things like abortion. Instead she decided to focus on border control and foreign policy, two Republican talking points, and even worse she decided to go right on both of them.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              15 hours ago

              We live in different worlds because I think her focus was on abortion and saving democracy. Border is both center and right imo, you’d be amazed.

              Foreign policy is an example of how no one cares about Gaza or Ukraine (or NATO), which are what the left cares about. The left didn’t show up. Yes the Gaza situation is fucked, but the difference between Harris and Trump are stark and vast.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                The difference is in who they will fuck over so we can stay greedy and entitled. Democrats fuck over poor people, republicans fuck over minorities and immigrants. Both groups fuck over the rest of the world.

                The left would vote for the “won’t fuck anyone over” party if there was one.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If a “real leftist” party arises from the ashes, guess what will happen? They will lose in the election. That’s the whole point of what I’m saying: left policies do not win elections. We literally just saw this. Harris said to the left “come out for your body rights. come out for your democracy.” If the left can’t come out for that they 1) will literally never ever come out, or 2) they don’t exist.

          What wins elections is “it’s the economy stupid”.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If we wanted to be Republicans we’d be Republicans for fucks sake…

    We can’t have 2 parties fighting to be the most hateful party of the billionaires. I mean I guess we can but only one gets to win.

    • buttfarts@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The Democrats have been chasing the mythical moderate conservative at the expense of the progressive left forever and have learned nothing. I want a fire and brimstone progressive who is belligerent and aggressive

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’d even be happy to settle for someone in the middle of the party willing to fight for the party’s supposed ideals. Remember when one of her slogans was “when we fight, we win”? Not “when we bipartisan, we win” or “when we coopt conservative issues, we win”.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    NO! Harris just needed to go further right. Forced goose-stepping marches at rallies. Pledges to eradicate all minorities. Promise global wars of conquest.

    Outflank Trump on the right, and the republicans AND democrats will vote for you.

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Usually somewhat ironic, but:

      https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishhook_Theory

      Fishhook Theory (or Fish Hook Theory) is an idea in left-right political science juxtaposed to Horseshoe Theory. Fishhook Theory asserts that the far-right and centrists are very similar, whereas the far-left is separate from them. Fishhook Theory takes its name from the fishhook shape it assumes the political spectrum to be, where the point of the hook is pictured to be the far-right, the eye is pictured to be the far-left, and the shank is pictured to be the centre.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      In a really morbid way that would’ve been funny to see, if only to witness the confusion of conservatives.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The fascist playbook has always been “meet me in the middle” and then take two steps back. Rinse, repeat. Fuck bipartisanship and fuck the corpo Dems.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Both her and Clinton should have been braver with VP choice.

    They both chose VP milquetoast when the time called for people wanting change.