• TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    They could go one step further and add braille support directly, it’s just nudges. Tactile feeling is the only reason they are back.

    Yes, I’m aware there are no blind drivers. The point is not having to look at your controls and doing so with something that already exists.

    • vonxylofon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Braille isn’t very good for quick discernment. It’s much easier to put differently-shaped buttons together or put buttons into different places.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Why not both? And blind people don’t seem to think so. Either way, better than what’s in the picture.

        • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Out of curiosity, have you actually spoken to blind people about how useful they find Braille?

        • DannyMac@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Feeling for a 2cm x 1.5cm button is way different than trying to read braille.

          • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Now try selecting between each of the buttons 2cm x 1.5cm for a particular button without having to feel the rest or having to glance at it.

            Literally just bumps that are even easier to make than the text on the buttons because they are just part of the plastic mold instead of additional paint jobs. Some people are just hostile to any basic improvement.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              We’re talking about something most people’s minds are not used to interpreting, so I fear that this would just add a layer of mental load for most drivers that would be actually less safe.

            • bluewing@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              You do realize that human touch can differentiate between .01mm? It’s why braille works so easily.

              • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                Imagine trying to both make the argument that braille is too hard to distinguish and that 0.01mm is easy to differentiate in the same thread.

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        105
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, so the thing is, any amount of trust that I had has already been completely destroyed. “We don’t do it anymore because it’s illegal, trust me bro” isn’t going to cut it. Does the bill include mandatory prison time for executives for violations, or just cost-of-doing-business fines? Will this be enforced by a government regulatory body that is not literally outnumbered 20:1 by car manufacturer lawyers?

        If the car has any kind of network capabilities and 100% of the car’s software is not open source, I’m not buying it. Period.

        This bill would not need to exist if cars were FOSS, or if cars were non-networked. Those are the only 2 solutions that I will accept. This bill is worthless to me.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s nice to have principles, but in a few years you’re going to have to find a new way to get around.

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            I mean, a lot of cars have a genuinely phenomenal life span, if you don’t mind getting something that isn’t shiny and new you can probably get like a 2012 Toyota or Honda and drive it till the wheels fall off. My dream car is from the 90s and people still generally regard them as fairly reliable

            Eventually it’ll be an issue, but that does leave a lot of time for nerds and hackers to find a way to gut networking stuff while telling the car it’s still intact. Dunno if we’ll ever see an open source car OS compatible with the systems in major manufacturer’s vehicles, but privacy workarounds feel like they could be pretty realistic

            • Anivia@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              My dream car is from the 90s and people still generally regard them as fairly reliable

              I would not want to share the road with modern oversized cars while driving a car with 90s crash safety

              I drive a Miata as a 2nd car for weekend fun, but it’s not a real option as a daily driver if you value your life

              Not to mention that it uses 8 liters of gas per 100km, whilst my daily driver averages 12wkh per 100km

              • Cris@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Thats fair. A na miata is basically my dream car, I hope to someday daily one in spite of being from the 90s 😅

          • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Lol cars last more than “a few years”, my current vehicle is 20 years old. I’ll easily get another 150,000 miles out of it, probably more. I already have a crate motor picked out to swap in when the engine finally dies. Or I could just “upgrade” to a newer year and still be non-networked.

            Now I’m being a little silly, but at this rate of climate change acceleration, I’m starting to bet that my current vehicle is going to outlive capitalism anyway.

        • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I didn’t read too far, but,

          To restrict car manufacturers and other companies from selling consumer car-related data, increase transparency regarding data practices, and for other purposes.

          already skips over collecting the data, so yeah. I would guess this bill just exists for the optics, and isn’t actually intended to challenge the industry.

        • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I agree with you, the damage has been done. That’s why I’m looking at alternative methods of transportation, like an ebike or public transit. Hopefully your area has good infrastructure for that.

  • Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Should be illegal to have touchscreen controls in a car, it requires you to look at it to effectively control it, which means the car forces you to ignore the road to do anything.

  • Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Hard disagree. Touch screens are more intuitive, can be updated to be made better, have the option for more controls, and don’t take any more time with your eyes off the road.

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Well with a touch screen you have to look at what you’re doing.

      With physical buttons, you don’t have to since they have a shape.

      Are you looking at your keyboard while typing on your computer? Now try not looking while typing on your phone 🤓

      • Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I have to look when adjusting physical buttons in my car, same as I have to look when adjusting things on the touch screen in my car. And I don’t have to look at my phone keyboard while typing.

        • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Do you have problems with object permanence in everyday life? or just in your car?

          • Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Interesting that you would say someone like that when the options on a screen are in the same place, too.

            • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Why even type this out?

              Do you just like arguing stupid points for fun even when you know yourself that you are wrong?

              Have you never seen an automotive touchscreen before?

              Even within one model/brand there are a ton of panes, and layouts. And even when you choose one layout, which apps are open changes the location and size of the buttons. Now add into that multiple brands, models, layout, and years… And your comment gets more worthless at every step.

              Beyond that. The screen doesn’t use haptic feedback to tell you where your fingers are so that the parts of your brain that evolved to handle that kind of context can use it without your fucking eyes. ‘Oh I touched the round thing, I know there are 4 rectangles next to this’ is a built-in feedback loop that a touchscreen does not provide at this time.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        When you’re fumbling to find the right switch/knob by feel your focus is still not on driving. It is at best very marginally better, and probably worse because you now think you’re still paying attention to driving even though you really aren’t. It’s still illegal to text while driving, even on an old phone with a physical keyboard, specifically for this reason.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Volume control is also accessible from the steering wheel on pretty much any car produced within the last 15 years, and certainly any with a touch screen. I’m not comparing to steering wheel controls.

            I’m comparing it to fiddling with AC settings on a centre console like everyone seems to me mentioning in this post.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              One, the volume knob is far quicker to respond than the usual ‘up/down’ slow volume adjustment on the wheel. The turn down the overly loud sound from the last driver immediately is nicer with a volume knob.

              But with my car with hard A/C controls, I just reach down to the little ‘up/down’ toggle and tug it down a bit if I feel a little warm or bump it up a little if I feel too cold, or hit the big old button if I need to toggle it off to talk on speaker.

              There are a fairly well known set of very common controls that will never be better and need an update. Coarse A/C adjustments, vent direction volume, and next-track are all no-brainers (unless you are Tesla…)

              For example, here’s a layout that obviously has room and depends on touch for a lot of features, but preserves a reasonably sane set of audio and climate controls (and four miscellaneous functions)

              With that you don’t look, you know pretty much immediately for the functions you would use.

              There’s still plenty of room for touch/voice controls for those more nuanced/complicated things that don’t fit into button land well. Entering a navigation destination, managing any software updates, setting parameters like "should the car adjust cruise control based on speed limit signs, and if so, what adjustment to the limit should be applied?’

    • Bezier@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      22 hours ago

      and don’t take any more time with your eyes off the road.

      Physical controls generally don’t have to be looked at at all to reach common controls.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      and don’t take any more time with your eyes off the road.

      Uh, yes, yes they do. Which is why buttons are superior there. It’s all about usecase. Keep your touchscreen for things like the navi settings.

  • Babalugats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Touch screens are shit tor buttons. They can be hacked. They can be unresponsive.

    There’s a load of other reasons, but either or both are enough to realise that a physical button is much safer. Perfect example of safety being lost in technology. Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    But we’ve still got a good 10 years of avoiding used cars. This era is literally landfill.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      10 years and counting

      There’s so much bullshit in new cars that’s it’s infuriating, especially considering the cars call home with all kinds of privacy violating bullshit.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Never mind that even 3-5 years down the line, some of these systems will fail to connect/ pair with the latest gadget in your pocket.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I didn’t have a car for a few years and the one I had was 2003 (with a slight stint from a similarly-aged car during a couple-month time I had to drive). I now have a car again and I HATE that my heat/air and such are all flat against the panel (not a touch screen, though). I literally can’t adjust anything without looking in my current car. Thankfully, I avoid driving it whenever possible.

  • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Touchscreens can stay, but only for non-essential tasks like changing settings or entering addresses. Climate, media, and all other controls you usually use while driving should be tactile by mandate.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Here’s my rule: Anything in my Chevy S10 that you control by turning a knob, moving a lever, or momentarily push a button? That needs to be a physical control in a car. Anything where you push and hold a button, or mash a button multiple times (like setting the clock or turning off the DRLs respectively) can be moved to a settings menu in a touch screen. These things shouldn’t be done while moving.

      And no, touch sensitive single-function panels like the climate controls in my father’s Avalon are not good enough, it needs to be a mechanical control that you can feel for without activating.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I prefer the tactile controls over the touchscreen. While you’re at it, bring back manual transmissions too!

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m so glad I kept my car and weathered through this shitty phase of car manufacturing.

    If only there was hope for weathering through the data collection, subscription-based features and the death of sedans though…

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Get any Infiniti with a 3g antenna. The network doesn’t exist anymore so it can’t phone home.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well, there are some strategies:

      • data collection - remove/disable the antenna/broadcasting chip - in some cars it’s as easy as removing a fuse, in others you need to take things apart to remove the TCU or modem
      • subscription-based features - don’t buy them and look for hacks to enabled them w/o buying
      • death of sedans - buy sedans

      Unfortunately, that’s a drop in the bucket since it seems the market in general wants larger cars with more spyware, and aren’t pushing back enough on subscription BS.

      I’m actively looking for a car, and unfortunately the process is:

      1. find models we want to try out
      2. look up online about how to disable the spyware nonsense
      3. actually go look at cars
      4. repeat from 1 as necessary
      5. play dealership games because the private used market is essentially gone
      6. actually remove spyware

      We’re on step 3, and I’m not looking forward to step 5. I’ve actually never purchased from a dealer before, because I’ve bought everything before now from a private seller. Wish me luck…

    • pinkystew@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I asked a dealer for a dumb-car. No fucking auto 911 dialing, bluetooth enabled, GPS service horseshit, just a normal car and he shot me

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I think you want a 2007 Toyota Corolla lol

        I’ve currently got a 2012 Mazda 3 but swapped the radio for one that supports Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. No other fancy features.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          We’re looking for a new car, but unfortunately there’s nothing between “sedan” and “minivan” that we want. We have three kids and a minivan, and we hardly use the extra seats or storage. It’s still working fine (it’s a mid-2000s Sienna), but my wife and I hate driving it, it has terrible gas mileage (20-ish MPG), we don’t need the space 99% of the time, and we never need the storage space and people space simultaneously.

          What I want is:

          • AWD
          • >30mpg, ideally 35+
          • flip-up third row (will be used like 1-2x/year, if that)
          • >30 cubic feet storage w/ third row unused (Prius is super close)
          • as small as possible
          • if I have to get an SUV, at least 1500lbs towing capacity (prefer >3000lbs)

          If they still made them, a station wagon would absolutely fit the bill. But now, I can’t have that, so I’m stuck in SUV-land.

          So my plan is to completely abandon the third row and get a compact hybrid SUV. If we buy new, it’ll be a Rav4 hybrid (the CR-V hybrid has a dinky 1000 lbs towing capacity, and if I have to get an SUV, I want the option). If we buy used, it’ll probably be a Ford Escape hybrid, not because it’s good, but because it’s cheap and good enough (Escape and Rav4 can both do 1500lbs towing). I don’t want either, but since there’s pretty much nothing in the sedan w/ storage space market (and I want more than suitcase storage, we camp quite a bit), I’m essentially being forced to get an SUV.

          I hate SUVs, but I guess that’s what we’re getting. I’ll probably get an EV for the second car (currently a Prius), if only for the convenience of never having to fill up gas again.

          • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Toyota RAV4 is nice. Especially the hybrid

            Edit: never mind you mentioned that

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Yup, they’re just a bit hard to get ATM because they’re super popular, so I’m not going to be able to haggle much to get a better deal. Used Rav4s go for the same if not more than new Rav4s.

              The Ford Escape, however, is pretty decent and a lot more available than the Rav4, so I can probably get a decent discount. There are several 3-4yo Ford Escapes at $10-15k less than new that look interesting in my area.

              That said, neither the Rav4 or the Ford Escape has an option for a third row/jump seats, which sucks.

              I really just want a station wagon…

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            It might be too large for your use case, but have you looked at the Kia EV9? The EV6 might be worth looking at too.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              EV won’t work because we do road trips quite a bit, charging infrastructure in the US sucks, and range would suck in the winter. If I’m going to get an EV, I’d need about double that range for a family car since we regularly go about 300-400 miles between charges, and often 800 miles in a day (takes about 13-14 hours driving). An EV would add a day to those trips, as well as require longer stops.

              I’m planning on getting an EV for my commuter (only need about 150-200 miles of range), but not for our family car until range improves significantly.

              • Thadrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                and often 800 miles in a day (takes about 13-14 hours driving)

                Oh wow. After my last trip that was supposed to take like 9 hours and ended up more like 12, I decided to never do that to myself ever again. But I guess if you have multiple drivers that can share the burden, such along day on the road is still an option.

              • dan@upvote.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                Makes sense.

                My wife and I don’t commute very far so an EV is fine for us even if we can only charge it with 120V initially (until we install a proper charger in our garage). We’ve got a BMW iX on order.

                Tesla is opening superchargers to all brands eventually. That’ll help a lot, as will the inevitable changes that’ll happen to gas stations where they replace some pumps with EV chargers.

                Range is definitely an issue, but it’s improving over time. 10 years ago, the average EV range was around 100 miles. I know BMW have tested a prototype car with ~600 mile range, and that tech should hopefully come with their Neue Klasse vehicles some time in 2026/2027. The Lucid Air gets around 500 miles range. Our current gas car (2012 Mazda 3) only gets around 360 miles until the gas light comes on, so it’s not actually that different for us.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Yeah, we’re right in that awkward window where EVs are almost good enough to replace the family car, but not quite.

                  We can usually get 400 miles out of our minivan, and filling up gas only takes a couple minutes. We usually pack lunches and whatnot for these road trips, so there’s really no reason to stop any longer than that. I guess it’s nice to stretch our legs or whatever, but we’d really rather just get to our destination and relax there.

                  With an EV, we’d probably get about 250 miles range since highway speeds are about 70-80mph in my area (probably a little less since fast charges aren’t everywhere), and then 20-30 min waiting to charge. For a typical 700-800 mile trip, that’s 3-4 stops, so if it’s 30 min each time, it would add 2 hours to the trip.

                  If we could get 400-500 miles range, we could recharge once, which is totally reasonable. But we’re not there yet, so we’re looking at hybrids for the family car and an EV for around town driving.