The Georgia process actually required the Dems to go through an appeal, so I’m sure it wasn’t cheap.
She’s on the ballot, or has write-in status in 42 states. Dems only managed to successfully kick her off the ballot in 2 states.
The Georgia process actually required the Dems to go through an appeal, so I’m sure it wasn’t cheap.
She’s on the ballot, or has write-in status in 42 states. Dems only managed to successfully kick her off the ballot in 2 states.
In what way is Russia a threat to peace?
On one hand, I really hope this is a government astroturfer, because I don’t want to believe someone is this ignorant. On the other hand, it would be really sad if someone is actually getting paid to post something so low effort and obviously whacko.
The Democrats don’t spend millions in legal fees to sue “fringe candidates” off of the ballot.
Yeah, media refusing to cover a candidate tends to impact their polling. Big surprise.
Then maybe the Dems should’ve ran a candidate who isn’t famous for her low favorability ratings.
If a candidate is so weak you have to rig the primary for them, they aren’t strong enough to compete in a general election. This isn’t rocket science.
The intelligence orgs just aren’t putting their best efforts into these bogus claims lately.
I love how even a biased take, trying to paint Harris much further left than she actually is, still went hard on Harris’ right-wing anti-immigration policies as if they were a good thing. LoL.
We won because we were allied with Russia.
Now we can’t be poor farmers in decades long wars. And you think the west is gonna be able to beat a superpower? You think that rabid nationalism is gonna protect you from nuclear arms?
You’re getting really unhinged in the comments for people just making sure the democrats are doing the opposite, which is what you’re implying they would do.
I suspect you’re getting upset because you know the Biden admin advanced some of Trump’s worst policies, and you don’t want anyone pointing that out.
When was the last time the west won a war?
It wasn’t meant to convince you. It was meant to show the lurkers you’re full of shit. I’m confident they get the picture.
Blocked.
I’m just saying it seems like a more obtainable ask.
Defending the oil lobby’s anti-nuclear propaganda is really not helping you.
https://environmentalprogress.org/the-war-on-nuclear
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/05/anti-nuclear-lobby-misled-world
https://www.influencewatch.org/movement/opposition-to-nuclear-energy/
https://climatecoalition.org/who-opposes-nuclear-energy/
https://www.axios.com/2017/12/15/big-oils-electric-fight-against-coal-and-nuclear-1513304200
the claim that the oil industry paid anyone to stop nuclear is a right wing lie.
Oil lobby bot confirmed.
Nuclear is not capitalists’ “biggest outfit.” You’re thinking of oil, and they pay astroturfers to convince people like you to be anti-nuclear.
I don’t assume unlimited funds. I know that the only way we can actually address climate change is to overthrow the capitalists driving the pollution. Ending their wars would provide far more than adequate funding, even before wealth redistribution.
I can’t imagine being so uninformed that you believe the advantages of nuclear energy has no scientific basis. On par with the flat earthers.
Why not just a case with a slide out Bluetooth keyboard in the back?
It’s easy to tell who’s been propagandized, because they care more about how much it will cost than actually saving the planet.
We’re not gonna talk about everything that happened since the Maiden Coup? The US controlled puppet government of far-right Nazis? The genocide of ethnic Russians for years in east Ukraine? The far-right government allowing establishment of NATO troops & missile deployments along the Russian border for years? The dictatorship reigning over Ukraine, which has banned rival parties, rival media, and refuses to hold elections?