Some people will be miserable no matter who is running

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m sure the Russians already have their list of alliterative agitprop ready to test on .ml before pushing the best ones to prod on Reddit and Facebook.

  • Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wonder if all those rampant anti Biden astroturfers are going to create new accounts to dump on Harris, or if they’ll just continue on.

    • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’ll be interesting to see what minor controversy from her past that voters glom onto and equivocate with Trump’s blatant assault on democracy.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        She argued in court in favor of California’s death penalty, and she threatened to jail parents of truant kids while she was the DA in San Francisco. It’s more complicated than those sound bites–like, it was her job to argue the state’s position–but you’ll get the sound bite opposition.

        I don’t like Harris since I support 2A rights in addition to things like LGBTQ+ rights, and right to choose, but I like her odds of winning more than I liked Biden’s.

        • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Truancy courts are not controversial. Literally holding a parent criminally liable for not sending their child to school. Maybe there’d be less Lord of the Flies gangs of tweenage criminals in every major city if truancy was better enforced.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            They shouldn’t be. But I recall the way that they were framed at the time made them sound really bad. When you looked into it, and realized that no one had even gotten past the threatened with arrest part, it started to make a lot more sense.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Truancy courts are not controversial.

            Throwing people in prison does not benefit the children of those people.

            And truancy courts don’t typically target far right homeschooler quiverfull families. They’re aimed squarely at Two Income Trap working families and poor single parents, already under the gun thanks to poor bussing policies, no statutory time off from work, and abysmal access to health care.

            Truancy laws are a tool of the School-To-Prison Pipeline. They substitute a criminal mandate for accessible education.

            Maybe there’d be less Lord of the Flies gangs of tweenage criminals in every major city if truancy was better enforced.

            More daycare, free school breakfast/dinner programs, public after school activities, and less child homelessness would go much farther towards reducing delinquent kids than arresting their parents.

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              truancy courts don’t typically target far right homeschooler quiverfull families.

              …Because they don’t have to. The homeschoolers are home schooling (or, at least claiming to do so), whereas truant kids aren’t being educated at all. If the parents that were going to truancy courts were home schooling kids, they could just say that and be done with it. (I’m no fan of home schooling; I think that it’s almost always a disservice to the kids. But it’s still a legal right.)

              IIRC, Harris had other programs that she was using/working with to reduce truancy rates, and courts were the last-ditch effort for parents that refused to even show up for anything else. If I recall correctly–and please, fact check me here–no parents received any jail time for truancy while she was a DA. It was used as a tool to get parents to take truancy seriously.

              And yes, I agree that school lunches, etc. would all help, But there’s only so many tools that a district attorney has to use. The DA can’t mandate a tax to cover daycare or after school activities; that’s the job of the city council or state legislature.

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This idea that any criticism of her is invalid and just misogyny/racism is bullshit. She is a very flawed candidate, ESPECIALLY for people of color.

        • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Her activity as a prosecutor. A particular standout for me was prosecuting lower income parents of color for school absenteeism. While I firmly believe children should be educated, I don’t think throwing overworked low income parents in jail is going to help keep those children in school, well supervised, and ultimately safe.

  • Veneroso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    What will the tankies use to justify not voting now?

    Probably her prosecution of Marijuana possession.

        • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I doubt Biden wasn’t going to stop Israel from annexing Palestine, either. Remember his “red line” they blew past? They’re basically equal on genocide, except for some words by Biden. With Kamala, I’m not sure yet, so she’s got that going for her.

          • Veneroso@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Additionally, we know Trump’s position of the illegal settlements during Trump’s last administration.

            Look into Pompeo Doctrine. It’s the throwing out of the long-standing position that settlements are inconsistent with international law.

            If you are seriously still considering Biden and Trump equal on this after I have given you verification and the actual truth, then you aren’t worthy of further discussion and you aren’t arguing in good faith, either you are a Tankie or a Russian Troll or a bot.

            https://www.axios.com/2024/02/23/israel-settlements-blinken-pompeo-trump-illegal

            ссыкло

            • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Biden doesn’t care about the illegal settlements either. He says he does, but he hasn’t done anything to change the fact that they’re increasing, nor the facts on the ground in terms of settler violence. He put out a few sanctions on like 4 guys, ignoring all the others, and sanctioned one military unit, which is still getting money because of the billions of dollars we give the rest of their government. They need to sanction the whole government like they do Russia for Ukraine, or at least high up government officials or business leaders. Otherwise, it’s just for show, like shouting ACAB while arresting one bad cop, and then giving the rest of the corrupt department money, military vehicles, and promotions.

              Rhetorically, they say different things, sure, but in terms of how things affect Palestinians, they’re basically the same. Biden just wrings his hands and shakes his head more before giving Israel the weapons and money, while Trump high fives them. Either way the genocide progresses at the same rate. They can’t bomb them any faster without ruining the rest of the international cover they have, or ruining the land they want to take with nuclear radiation.

          • Veneroso@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            She came out early in favor of a ceasefire. As VP, she is complicit, but she’s ultimately powerless to change it. As a result I don’t hold her responsible. I doubt that there will be much publically said, as Biden will be president until January 20th at Noon, but given her being a former prosecutor, she clearly respects the law. And I am going to assume international law, she’s a strong woman, and I feel that she’s not going to cowtow to Israel, in my opinion.

            Trump’s son in law, Jared Kushner has openly called for the opening of the Palestinian beaches and then a construction of a Trump Tower. You can call that equal if you want. Biden has been at least slowing offensive aid packages, Netanyahu is very upset and has been openly condemning it as Biden being pro Hamas. Imagine Biden, famed Zionist, being pro Hamas.

            https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/security-aviation/2024-06-27/ty-article/a-dizzying-pace-then-a-drop-how-u-s-arms-shipments-to-israel-slowed-down/00000190-59b6-dc65-abff-79bff9b10000

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Now that “Genocide Joe” is out, the Lemmy-Leftists LARPing as communists have gone mask-off and are just proudly pushing accelerationism.

    It was always a front.

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      She is just as genocidal as Biden. We are being critical because at least for me I was gaslit into voting for Biden despite all the red flags.

      I knew that Biden was anti-Arab and specifically anti-Palestinian. But liberals assured me it will be fine. Well it isn’t fine we got a genocide. Once bitten twice shy.

  • Cowbob12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This whole debate among the American left just feels to me as a big sign of “letting perfect be the enemy of good”

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yes, some of us don’t like genocide or chattel slavery which are too things she made a career out of.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This thread is about us politics, pretty sure .ml is where you want to discuss Chinese policies.

      • ILikeYourBoobs@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah… You may want to look into prison labor laws, then check incarceration rates in the US. We have slavery with extra steps.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          There’s a huge difference between us needing major criminal justice reform and her making a career as a chattel slaver. The fact that you even made this leap makes me believe you have no interest in a good faith argument.

    • wreel@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve got money on “Crooked Cop Kamilla”. The licensing should make me millions.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        By the standard of cops she’s not even crooked. Shes just a cop which is just as bad. But if she’s at the very least anti-genocide then shes got my vote.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          She explicitly kept people in California jails because they were needed to fight wild fires. When it became obvious how unpopular it was, she blamed it on her staffers

          She helped to try to cover up the San Francisco Catholic church child molestation issue.

          I personally know people whos parents ended up arrested because of the bullshit truancy ‘arrest the parents’ program she advocated for and then oversaw as attorney general.

          She is a horrible person. Obviously not Trump, but still an awful person.

          There is a lot to criticize her for based on her record. Don’t pretend there isn’t.

          Edit: all that said, she hasn’t yet supported genocide, so I will vote for her. She is, however, a great example of why prosecutor should be a terminal political position.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    We’re electing a president, not a monarch. Nobody is above criticism, and there’s a weird segment of people who act like criticism from the left exists only to help the right.

    Like, I actually saw someone say we shouldn’t do it because it’s too nuanced for the average voter, and sorry but I don’t do paternalism like that. If reading criticism of how a candidate isn’t far enough left makes you vote further right, that’s a basic political literacy problem.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because when all those people do is criticize Democrats, sabotage outreach efforts, and don’t put any time or effort into defeating fascists, then it is very obvious where they stand.

      Like I get it - huffing farts from time to time is great. But you gotta take a break and mix some productive advocacy and outreach if you actually care about Democracy instead of just smelling farts.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, we could focus on defeating the GOP and the day after the election results come in start using social pressure to guide our elected officials. If the criticism risks the GOP seizing even more power, it might be counterproductive to your goals even if the criticism is valid.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Any good faith criticism of the Dem candidate should be obvious in its criticisms that R policies are inherently worse. For example, Harris’ record as DA is worth criticizing, but any bad decisions related to imprisoning people are going to be a million times worse under Trump, as Project 2025 shows.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Exactly this. On this platform and elsewhere, there is a lot of well-meaning criticism but there are many agents of chaos or narrative pushers that disguise themselves as genuine criticism. I try to interact genuinely and give an opportunity to demonstrate that they are looking for a constructive path forward for the party.

        • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Any good faith criticism of the Dem candidate should be obvious in its criticisms that R policies are inherently worse.

          Your argument would be great if we didn’t live in the reality presented below. There are too many people sitting on the fence who legitimately cannot discern between a mediocre candidate and a career conman, criminal rapist. Where you see nuance, others see “she’s no better than Trump”.

          Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20240721200927/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/us/elections/polls-president.html

          I like Harris as much as I like Biden, which is not at all, but the alternative is the very real possibility of the end of America.

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            For my money those charts will look very different after the next debate.

            There’s also not a combination of words that’s going to convince me leftists criticizing Dems are going to kill America. Even if Trump gets elected, you are missing every potential lesson if what you take away is “leftists too mean.”

      • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well, last time we pushed Biden left it was called too soon after election, give them time to form a plan. Form a cabinet, figure out policies.

        Then it was midterms. Questioning the policies for misterm gives Republicans a win. They have to keep these conservative polices set by the last Republican to win over Republican voters.

        Then it’s 2024. Questioning policies is a win for Republicans. They need to win this election, and then we can push them left.

        I’m hoping it ends with a younger nominee.

  • fantasyocean@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    And I will remain blind to them. America is about to live in the context of the Coconut Lady. (I will support whoever gets the nomination at the end of the DNC.)

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        What policies will this shit provide for the everyday American?

        Its not a convicted felon and has taken 0 human rights away. Vote for the cleanest shit!

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        This attitude almost got Biden nominated, which would have guaranteed a Trump presidency.

        You have to force Democrats to be good enough to actually win.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I nominate Danica Roem. She’s INCREDIBLE, highly effective, and trans, so she’ll have every Republican having the vapours every day 100 times more than Obama did.

    Seriously she’s awesome.