Ersei, the developer behind this so-called Cloud Native Computer, says the project was primarily a “silly” pursuit. There is also a problem with booting from Google Drive currently being very slow. However, the dev also boasts that “the possibilities are endless” and would welcome any companies or individuals who wish to get in contact and discuss commercializing this project or something related to it.

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    More being able to use cloud storage and not need a full physical secondary computer. In theory the cloud can be accessed anywhere, even if a portion is down, not the same for a single physical PC.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The cloud is many computers with a redundancy, you putting multiple PCs in remote locations so you can access when one goes down….?

        One requires two physical computers, while one requires one and the cloud. Not a hard concept here or anything people.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The joke is about what exactly you’re doing with the cloud with no physical computer in front of you.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Because you said “not need a physical computer”. If there is no physical computer, with what device are you accessing the cloud?

                • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  No one is arguing against its redundancy. We are saying you still need your own physical device to access the cloud. Whether its a computer, phone, or anything else. That was the joke.

                • catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Traditional computing involves a computer on a desk. If everything is in the cloud, and there is no physical computer, then there is nothing on the desk. How do you access the cloud with a bare desk? That is the joke. Presumably you meant that there is no singular server, and a deliberate misinterpretation like the other commenter’s is a form of humor (Brône, 2008).

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Okay so you should comprehend how multiple “computers” allow a redundancy over a single one.

            Yeah….?

            You can’t access a remote physical computer without internet either? So what’s your point here?

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I do, clearly you don’t if you need to ask the question.

                So what are you doing here exactly? You’re not adding to the discussion, so that would make you a troll, no?

                  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    What is so hard to understand about one needing two full physical computers, while one needs a single full physical computer?

                    refusing to answer

                    I did answer and the statement wasn’t nonsense. What’s hard to understand about the difference between two and one…?

                    One has redundancy and one doesn’t… not shockingly they are different things for this reason……