It is 100% toungue in cheek because of that post.
It is 100% toungue in cheek because of that post.
But even if they and their country do everything right, the rest of world may (isn’t) and it’s going to be more or less the same anyways.
But even if they and their country do everything right, the rest of world may (isn’t) and it’s going to be more or less the same anyways.
Zoom in or get glasses, I think your talking about 3 people like they’re a blob?
What do you expect them do on an individual or even municipal level? It’s a global issue.
Even if they sell, they would be negligent to not inform future buyers of the future flood risk. People aren’t going to want to buy, and now they stuck with a property that’s eventually going to wash away and they can’t do a thing about it themselves.
In the context of the USA, yeah I guess that’s fair.
Other countries have better checks and balances, most of what I’ve seen on this has been non-USA research, so likely there’s a reason for that.
Very first paragraph for starters.
Old movies….
Second paragraph
This was supposed to obvious about upcoming stuff, what’s relevant about current projects….?
A short read further:
Th is paragraph more reads past tense, how does this say he has new movies coming out without prior knowledge…?
I read the article, clearly you didn’t and are conflating articles or are bringing prior knowledge it and making connections.
Its okay to be wrong….
Jesus Christ, sorry for explaining a viewpoint to you.
Is this how you converse with people? Fucking yikes, get help dude…
If you just assume I also had this viewpoint, fuck off lmfao.
Characters that aren’t white men?
You mean what was profitable and what the public wanted at the time…?
You still somehow don’t understand what astroturfing is. But it m not surprised if you’re such a brainless meatball you can’t handle a leading women.
I’m not the same person… fucking yikes buddy. Step away from the keyboard for the day.
That soil is feed for other organisms that make CO2, some plants are better than others, but they almost all wind up being carbon neutral in the end. The only way to get rid of it, would be to cut it down and send it into space. If you could do that without producing more CO2…
The leaves get eaten by bugs that produce CO2, so even if it was somehow carbon positive, bugs and other things would make it a very moot point.m very fast.
Bottom line people have already thought of these things and debunked them, it doesn’t matter, they aren’t carbon positive.
Some people feel this being shoved down the throats of the public (hence the astroturfing), no different than the wave of zombies, wave of pirates, wave of X, wave of Y. They are all overdone, and everyone is trying to eat of the public opinion/market. They aren’t doing it for the right reasons, they are doing it for profit. THATS the issue.
Where are the donations to woman’s rights organizations? They don’t handle it right.
Not overly, it feeds other carbon producing life forms too, bugs, worms, deer.
You’re not wrong, but eventually it will decay and come out. 1000 years, or demolished for an expansion after 10 years.
Survivorship bias as well, not all timber houses will last the test of time, same with furniture. The point is, it all will eventually come back out, so it’s more of a, not my problem, it’s the futures problem. Or ship it to someone else. Either way, it’s neutral.
It’s the prominent female role during a time of corporations trying to be more accepting, while sometimes going too far.
Astroturfing may not quite be the right term, but Sony definitely had a little agenda while pushing the marketing of this particular IP.
Where can I find that information in the linked article? It mentions nothing of Bacons future plans or why he did the stunt.
If you want to try to claim someone didn’t read an article, atleast make sure the information wasn’t from another first or something dude……
That’s the issue though, trees were thought to be carbon positive, A the tree species matters, and when the trees naturally die it comes back out. It’s only temporary storage.
Idk if I would call it a scam or if they just didn’t do enough prior research ahead of time.
Trees are carbon neutral during their life cycle. They take and store carbon in their leaves, wood and roots while growing, than when they decay they release all that CO2 back out.
So yeah you can grow a forest, store the carbon, and ship it somewhere else to build buildings and now it’s their carbon problem. Paper, any wood products really accomplishes much of the same goal.
The trees really aren’t a “scam” just not as thought out as it was supposed to be. Some trees are better than others for “storing” carbon as well.
I shouldn’t have to do research if something is obvious………
During covid, they were out of touch so obviously it can’t be anything else. If you research that, you would find evidence of this as well.
Neither is obvious to someone with knowledge of either, but celebrities were forcing it down everyone’s throats during covid. So hard to plead ignorance here…
And yeah, I quoted an obviously missed paragraph by a person who responded to me. I should have done it here again for you, since you apparently missed it again as well. Not going to address it… or what…?
I always love finding the little nuggets, like the fuck is this post going on about, see there is no comments and scroll a few pages and see the post. Or saw it in the morning. Its just small enough that 8 hours doesn’t seem to miss too much content on the first few pages of the “all”.