• dottedgreenline@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalism’s toddlerification of it’s “successful” participants literally creates these meaningless dialogues. Our imbecilic hierarchies don’t just extend to the economical, they affect these types of social norms heavily too. There will always be a cheap way to elicit prejudice over disadvantageous and unprofitable ideas especially if the voices are from “undesirable” individuals and groups, which depending on your brainwashing target can be literally anything. We have to be able to teach already brainwashed individuals critical thinking.

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have to be able to teach already brainwashed individuals critical thinking.

      Which sadly has proven impossible.

      If anything, we need to figure out a way to move without trying to convince people who will never be convinced. Which is of course a really difficult problem, and riddled with risks of falling into authoritarianism.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not that the kids won’t save us, it’s because they can’t. We are all headed for an ecological hellscape as our new reality. We need to stop squabbling about it and start preparing. We are past the poibt of avoidance

  • clover@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If there is a moderate to high likelihood that the average citizen can’t afford rent and have a voice in government (ie. protesting 2 days a week, because their vote doesn’t effect policy) they live in neither a free society, nor a democracy.

    One of the reasons children have been able to lead the protests is because they have a safety net.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If there is a moderate to high likelihood that the average citizen can’t afford rent and have a voice in government (ie. protesting 2 days a week, because their vote doesn’t effect policy) they live in neither a free society, nor a democracy.

      In other words a free society, needs enough people to have high enough income, to have a good bit of free time and enough wealth or a strong safety so they do not have to rely on a job. Which is why homeownership is a good thing, coops and other forms of small scale ownership of capital is needed and social safety nets help the entire society. The further away those safety nets are from the government the better, as it is easy to withdraw otherwise, which is why real world “communism” was not democratic.

      One of the reasons children have been able to lead the protests is because they have a safety net.

      Unfortunatly that is also the reason they can not transform society, as the safety net of children is fragile. It only takes the parents to disagree with them.