• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    FFS I’m not talking about the article for a reason. How (or why) you refuse to understand that is beyond me.

    Yeah yeah hooked on phonics, ace repartee. Anyway.

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      If you’re not going to read the article or have any interest in it, why bother interacting on the subject at all? The fuck are you even talking about then?

      • TacoSocks@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I think you are ignoring point they are making. If the headline and article tell two different stories, those who just read the headline can come away with a different impression of what’s happening. You can argue people that just read the headline shouldn’t exist, but they do.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          No, I get that that’s their point. I’m definitely making the argument that if all you’re going to read is the headline, then maybe don’t complain about missing out on the full context.