• FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 个月前

    Unless we have some serious alternatives, that won’t happen anytime soon

    Video hosting is really expensive. Every service running for free will eventually enshitify and turn out similar, because there’s no such thing as free massive servers

    • Rin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 个月前

      It is… they’ve out spent the competition. Now that no one else is around, they’re trying to make all the money they can. Luckily, it won’t be long before some other alternative will pop up anyway.

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      Peertube has already delivered the sustainable model: creators host their own videos and viewers assist distribution.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 个月前

        All they need that I see is missing, is a way to discover / search everyone from any instance. Like, a consolidated / federated search.

      • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 个月前

        Who pays for the servers? Because if even big platforms like Signal sometimes struggle to pay the bills, in part because they spend a lot on their servers, then it’ll be dozens of times worse with video hosting

        • brisk@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 个月前

          Content creators. It’s hard to host everyone’s videos, and it benefits monopolists to imply that doing so is necessary, as it prevents new entrants. It’s not nearly as hard to host your own server (or pay for it to be hosted). It becomes harder when you suddenly become popular, a situation which Peertube explicitly compensates for by sharing the distribution effort between viewers, which scales with popularity.

          Signal makes it’s own bed like YouTube by being a single centralised server for everyone. Nobody ever asks “who pays for the servers” when it comes to Matrix or XMPP