Donald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 小时前Trump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down114
arrow-up138arrow-down1external-linkTrump Administration Argues a Judge's Verbal Order Is 'Not Enforceable'www.newsweek.comDonald J. Musk@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 小时前message-square10fedilink
minus-squareSwordgeek@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up24·9 小时前Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies. He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·9 小时前I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
minus-squaremiss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·8 小时前Lemmy demands an “/s”.
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-28 小时前Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 小时前Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.
Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies.
He’s not asking, he has already declared it.
I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”
Lemmy demands an “/s”.
Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.
Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.