• Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think just translating word by word what he says is the best way to bring across what he is trying to say anyways. its not like there is deeper structures that need to be conveyed.

    I understand though, that it is difficult to do, if you are used to turning eloquence into eloquence.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 hours ago

      But you then need to unlearn a lifetime and career of pattern recognition.

      I think this is honestly how Trump gets people who haven’t learned critical thinking. It’s all vibes and insinuation, so it sucks you into finishing his thoughts for him. And you think, “well actually that sounds reasonable”, because of course it does, because it sounds like you.

      It exploits your natural impulse to meet the other person halfway and do the work for them. But Trump isn’t trying at all, he’s just doing pure word-association, and he’s not your friend. I think anyone who’s prone to unhealthy parasocial bonding is especially vulnerable to it.

      I remember hearing his speeches when he was first coming to power and realising how seductive that pull was. I was constantly having to slap my own hand away from taking charge of where the sentences were going, and really pay attention to what he was actually saying, and it was always nonsense with a healthy dose of hatred, but usually couched in language that sounded vaguely personable, like, “Hey, we’re all friends here, you get it, what I’m saying, right?”

      If you already agreed with him, it would be easy.