• Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think I’ve seen anyone with a problem with the computing concept itself, they have a problem with the unnecessarily unpleasant and offensive nomenclature. There’s lots of ways to express a leader/follower dynamic that’s intuitively understandable. Hell, call them Dom/Sub drives if you want to.

    There’s just no good reason to invoke historical attrocity that’s still ongoing to describe a concept like this.

    • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok fair point and that is a really funny idea. But afaict dom/sub dynamics aren’t complete control and it would be pretty dangerous if they were