A person can be killed instantly through many different means.

As we know it, to be killed painlessly, is to be killed instantly.

If you instantly destroy a person’s entire brain then they died without pain.

Yet the most effective ways of instantly destroying someone’s entire brain are considered inhumane.

If instantly killing someone by smashing their head with a massive rock, or shooting them in the brain stem is inhumane, then there is no humane way to kill someone at all.

    • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Death penalty isn’t the only way to kill people…

      Murder, War, “Police” Violence, “Military interventions (totally 3 days only)”…

          • Solumbran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a weird edge case that is between killing and assisted suicide, assuming there is consent.

            Euthanasia without consent seems not so humane to me, but once again it is an edge case that is still hard to define.

          • Solumbran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is a difference, but if you start saying that shooting an invader is humane, you have a serious problem.

            • elephantium@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Self-defense is inhumane? Call out the invader first, please, then we can talk about whether the defender is overdoing it.

              • Solumbran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Killing is inhumane.

                Killing in self defense might be necessary, yet it does not become humane just because you want it to.

              • Solumbran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That sounds like your average american too.

                Nonetheless, if you start thinking that killing is humane because “they deserve it”, I will repeat myself, you have a serious problem.

                Because I’m pretty sure that this horrible rapist invader is also convinced that you deserve it, yet I don’t believe you would find their behaviour humane for that reason.

                • elephantium@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  if you start thinking that killing is humane because “they deserve it”, I will repeat myself, you have a serious problem.

                  Fair enough. While I don’t subscribe to pacifism, I do prefer that self-defense be regarded as an unfortunate necessity. Celebrating violence isn’t going to help us.

                  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It can be a necessity and still be inhumane.

                    Having to do something does not make it good, and it’s fine as long as people see it.

                  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Because I said that killing is inhumane?

                    Oh I forgot, Russia doesn’t kill anyone, silly me /s

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most people are subject to the death penalty. The world population is approaching 8.1 billion souls. The ten most populous nations are India, China, the US, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, Brazil, Bangladesh, Russia, and Mexico, adding up to 4.6 billion – over half the planet.

      Of those, only Mexico has abolished the death penalty (though Brazil is listed as “extreme only” and Russia is listed as “suspended”, having not officially executed anyone in the past decade*). Putting these together, at least 4.1 billion people out of the “first 4.6” that I looked at live under the specter of the death penalty.

      I don’t think you can no-true-scotsman your way out of the simple fact that it’s still “normal” for humans to kill other humans. I also don’t think that acknowledging that fact requires that you endorse the practice.

      *whoa, is this a case where RUSSIA is more sane than the USA?! Strange times.

      I looked up the population info on https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/ and cross-referenced with the site you posted.