cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17202407

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) introduced a bill this week to legally erase transgender people, entitled the “Defining Male and Female Act of 2024.” He claimed that the bill will stop what he called the Biden administration’s attempt to “replace biological sex with dangerous radical gender ideology.”

The bill is a long list of terms and definitions, where words like “father” and “girl” are defined with the words “male” and “female.” Those two words are then defined as “an individual who naturally has, had, will have, or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes [sperm or eggs for male or female, respectively] for fertilization.”

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    29 days ago

    That was what i was asking

    One argument i have seen against acknowledging the existence of trans people is that people will be tricked into changing their gender

    Its not a good argument, but it exists.

      • RandomVideos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        I wasnt asking for valid arguments against a group of people

        Also, i had to search the definition of the word subtext