• rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I have no love for big corps, but they’re likely just reading the writing on the wall. they have to deal with retribution for the next 4-12 years and they have no interest becoming the rebels. I’m kinda impressed they stepped away at all other than it probably was money spent for nothing.

      • fern@lemmy.autism.place
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        IBM supported the Nazis, and if they’re the only tech giant not fighting musk they’re going to get the kickbacks. Corps dont do “writing on the wall” anymore, they chase money, which may look similar but the goals are different.

        • Zannsolo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          The writing on the wall is if you want government money don’t piss off the pool boy of cheetolini

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Doesn’t matter. They’re not doing it to get people to see their ads, they’re doing it to bribe Elon since he has actual political power now. Kind of like how oil companies buy ads on news media, even though you don’t need to be persuaded to buy oil - it’s to buy favorable coverage.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    10 hours ago

    wow who could have predicted this considering they’re the same companies who said they wouldn’t donate to republicans after january 6th three months before they started donating to republicans again.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My favorite lemmy bubble is the smug woke ( idiot leftists, who think they are smart but aren’t) who think Kamala lost because she didn’t take a stance on Gaza and people abstained in protest and not because of sexism and racism.

      • discount_door_garlic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I mean, there’s no singular reason for Kamala’s loss - but abstentions over the middle east were still a reasonably noteworthy problem for the campaign.

        With that being said… more broadly, people are just generally awful and a lot of people bury their heads in the sand rather than acknowledging how backwards the majority really are.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Maybe I am too european but I have seen two people lose to Trump and one overwhelming win against him and only one of those had a penis.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I think you’re also missing a huge part of it. People don’t care about Gaza nearly as much as people here think, nor do people care about her race or gender much.

        You can see a massive shift in betting odds and polls around the time she had an interview where she said she wouldn’t have done anything different than Biden. My general perception is that she didn’t really have a plan, and I think that’s true for the public. I also think the public didn’t like the comparison of Trump with Hitler. Trump, on the other hand, claimed to have a plan for fixing the economy, and I think that resonated with people, especially since the economy was good under Trump. They see the inflation during COVID as Biden’s problem (I personally blame supply chain disruption mostly, and also Trump’s spending), and Harris refused to throw Biden under the bus.

        I personally blame Harris’s loss on three things:

        • late entry - Biden should’ve dropped out sooner so they could have a real primary
        • lack of real difference vs Biden
        • running mate choice - should’ve picked Shapiro from Pennsylvania, not Walz

        I don’t think her being female hurt her, and it probably helped her appeal to female voters vs Trump, and Obama winning implies race doesn’t matter much either. To me, it comes down to policy and lack of a primary. People wanted change, while she offered more of the same. If you don’t believe me, watch some interviews with people in swing states and listen to what they’re most interested in.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That would be REALLY Corrupt if simply buying Ads on a Website was Enough to allow you to DIRECTLY INFLUENCE the President Of The United States! Fortunately Trump DIDNT put the Owner of X in charge of Important Oversight Decisions!

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      When Hitler needed to track the unwanted in his concentration camps, IBM was there.

      Today, Trump has selected IBM due to our experience in this field of Fascism.

      FYI: while this is not true, I’m sure most Americans will believe it.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Still, “under $2,000” for a corporation of that size is a surprisingly low amount, compared to the others. Not even worth the negative publicity. Odd choice.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Ah, a history joke! Don’t forget Coke(Fanta)! Also, the history of Volkswagon is pretty interesting.

      The surprising part is, despite everything Henry Ford believed, I don’t remember ever hearing Ford being on that list.

  • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    204
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    “X’s owner now has the ear of the president-elect, a man who has a long history of helping his friends, and punishing his enemies,” said Max Willens, senior analyst, at Emarketer. “Sending at least a trickle of ad spending toward X may be seen as good for business, albeit in an indirect way.”

    There’s the article in a nutshell. Give Elmo money or face the wrath of the Diaper-in-Chief.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    When have Comcast, Disney, or IBM ever have been on the wrong side of history? /s

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    And nobody was surprised. I predict most advertisers will return by the end of January for the same reasons they left previously: It’s the right business decision at the right time. Remember that the next time a corporation makes a pledge. It’s always about money.