• gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re doing guilty until proven innocent here, which, is weird

    No, they’re pointing at the video footage of someone committing a crime and accurately describing the crime

    YOU are up and down this thread going “well ackshully by my limited definition and the fact that no court has ruled on it means this isn’t genocide so nyeh!” Large chunks of text going in circles to argue for unreality

    That’s weird

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, they’re pointing at the video footage of someone committing a crime and accurately describing the crime

      yeah but that doesn’t matter. What matters is the legal criminal proceedings. Unfortunately the israel palestine crowd has backed themselves into a corner here claiming that it’s legally genocide, when they have a moderate basis of evidence for this. To my knowledge there hasn’t been a single legal proceeding besides the ICJ case brought by south africa.

      This is the entire basis of evidence you are working with here.

      If i were to shoot you in the head with a gun. That would be a crime. However, i would only be charged with that crime after the courts have been run through and they determine that me shooting you in the head with a gun, is in fact, not legal.

      This is vigilante justice to the highest degree because we’re too impatient to do anything other than opinion based colonization because anybody who disagrees with this even moderately is clearly too brainrotted to engage in this thread.