If only Americans didn’t hate LGBT and minorities so much they might be actually be able to progress instead of continuing the American tradition of two steps forward one step back.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, the Democrats are also corrupt but at least they respect human rights and have some nice policies that get through.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The struggle for me is Democrats will never fix the root issue, which is capitalism. Yes they’re the better of the two right leaning options but why can’t socialists get our shit together and make an actual leftist party?

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because it would split the party enough that Republicans would gain further control.

        Unfortunately, the best way to move things further left is not “yet another party”, but decimation of the Republican party and then fracture (with FPTP is replaced). With FPTP in place, any party further left than democrats will just fail, because Republicans will dominate and further restrict voting to maintain control. We are seeing that very thing right now with election commissions in GA.

        The only other option is the tankie hope for a civil war, which I am so much against I would not only argue against, but would actively fight against that sort of destructive approach which would serve only to harm and kill imo.

        So what to do? Support people in primaries who are as far left as possible. Participate in the process, including primaries. Vote in local elections. Volunteer.

        Be the left you want to see in the Democrats.

        • joostjakob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          As someone who lives under representative representation, I totally agree that FPTP should go. But being against that system doesn’t have to ve a leftist strategy. I think everyone who does not feel represent by the two big parties can get behind a change there. Pushing that idea across the spectrum could be helpful. It might even be an idea to start an alliance party with as only program point an overdue constitutional reform. You wouldn’t need other policies: simply reform & hold new elections as soon as possible afterwards

          • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            100% it impacts voters of all parties

            Since Republicans would lose more ground that way though, they will continue to push unrelated issues for single issue voters, and continuously make it “not the right time!” to address FPTP.

            And while that sounds nice to reform immediately, that isn’t how things would work given our Constitution. So I don’t think it would realistically work out

      • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mostly a combination of laziness, the need to work 50-60 hours/week to survive, and good old-fashioned leftist infighting.

        • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Don’t forget the two party system (FPTP voting), gerrymandering, the electoral college, the debates being organized by the two parties themselves instead of an unbiased third party organization, mainstream media (in general), private money in politics, and every other systemic issue preventing political third parties from existing.

      • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because we never elect someone on the left. The best we can do is someone only slightly Right of center. We can’t even get someone in the center let alone someone actually on the left

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The way there is to get involved in local and state politics, primary right-wing Dems and organize enough voters to replace them with left-wing Dems

        • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Almost. The need for a third (and fourth etc) party is real. Dems are very interested in the capitalism, more so than human rights. An actual left party is needed for balance.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The only way to have viable third+ parties in the US is to drastically change the election system, and the only way to do that is to reform the Democratic party

    • Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Anyone in power is corrupt to some extent. Anyone. There are no exceptions.

      There are only people who let it corrupt them less than those around them.

      That’s it.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Respect human rights? Look around. Start with Palestine and then take a look at California leveraging the recent Supreme court ruling to outlaw homelessness.