• sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a much better idea. There should still be term limits, though.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Term limits will require a constitutional amendment. We don’t actually need term limits.

      What we can do instead is remove the fixed size of the court, and impose a fixed rate of appointments to the court. One appointment should be made between 6 and 12 months after the presidential inauguration, then another between 30 and 36 months. No appointments can be made outside these windows. When a justice dies or retires, their seat is not filled.

      We will need a method of quickly replenishing the court in case of disaster, so I would establish a line of succession. If the court falls below 7 members, the senior Chief Judge in the 13 circuit courts is automatically elevated to SCOTUS.

      This line of succession also gives us a means for preventing the Senate from gaming the system: all of the Circuit Chief Judges are pre-confirmed by the Senate to a position that places then in line for the court. If the president appoints someone from the SCOTUS line of succession, they are immediately elevated, without needing to be reconfirmed by the Senate.