The Democratic Socialists of America pulled its endorsement of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York this week, accusing the progressive congresswoman of being insufficiently supportive of the Palestinian cause and efforts to end the war in Gaza…

Her approach has increasingly strained her relationship with some of the left’s most strident critics of Israel. When she rallied last month in the Bronx with Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Jamaal Bowman, dozens of pro-Palestinian demonstrators angry over her endorsement of Mr. Biden chanted “You’re a fraud, A.O.C.”

  • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Ugh, genocide is bad, but we have other things to worry about right now.”

    — You, and most Germans during World War II.

    • 0laura@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      genuine question, what alternative is there to voting for whatever candidate the democrats run with?

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Serious replies:

        • Developing alternate forms of power to ‘vote once every four years’. Now, I realize it’s probably not the answer you’re looking for as obviously that won’t just happen in time for this election, but it’s necessary to understand the material power we hold as workers in society, unless you’re actually happy with whatever candidates the Democrats run with. There have been times where worker action hindered genocidal regimes and wars by cutting off supply and pressuring our governments into pulling support.

        • Pressuring the Democrats away from running certain candidates

        • Somehow making a third-party popular enough to threaten your local seat [probably not feasible for most seats?]

        • Somehow abolishing the broken FPTP voting system [probably not feasible?]

        • 0laura@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          right but couldn’t you vote for the democrats and also do those things? it’s not really a one or the other kind of situation

          • comfy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Definitely, and for most people (there are rare exceptions, like seats which aren’t just Dem vs. Rep as the only viable candidates) I’d assume it’s the pragmatic choice for now given the broken system.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Somehow abolishing the broken FPTP voting system [probably not feasible?]

          Not feasible? Then why do Alaska and Maine use something other then First Past The Post voting?

          How we vote is controlled at the state level, we can push through reform one state at a time!

          • comfy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            My mistake, I heard about those but assumed it only applied for state-level politicians, not federal politicians they elect. Thanks for letting me know!

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      “Genocide is bad, but we have other things to worry about.” - Me, and the US offering vast amounts of Lend-Lease in WW2 to the Soviet Union despite their vast campaigns of ethnic cleansing.

      Apparently, by contrast, your position is “Genocide is bad, so we should do everything we can to lose to the Nazis, who will genocide far more people than the Soviet Union. That will really show the fascists! They’ll be SO mad when they herd us into the gas chambers lol!”