• rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    100%. And what about the water requirements for managing and controlling the nuclear reactor?

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      there’s no such thing as water requirements, the water that’s used in the core is in a closed loop, and the one that gets used to generate the steam is then put back into where it was taken (river etc)

      not to mention that’s what all power plants do, electricity generation has always been about the best way to heat up water

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s still a water requirement and that water is bathing in isotopes. And solar and wind don’t require steam for power generation.

        • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The water that’s being used to generate power isn’t touching the core at all

          as for solar and wind, you are right, but don’t underestimate how many solar panels and wind turbines you should have to put to completely replace all power production, that’s an immense land requirement, not to mention the immense material cost

          But hey, if we can manage to get enough renewables I’m completely on board

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Definitely a concern. But fortunately, batteries are >90% recyclable and chemistry is changing all the times to reduce the dependence upon finite minerals.