Johnson claimed that Trump violently raped her when she was 13 at a 1994 orgy hosted by Jeffrey Epstein — the billionaire who was convicted in 2008 of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution and has been accused of having sex with more than 30 underage girls.

Johnson said Trump had sexual contact with her at four of those parties, including tying her to a bed and violently raping her in a “savage sexual attack.” The lawsuit said Johnson “loudly pleaded” with Trump to stop, but that he responded by “violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted.”

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    See, here we are again worried about your feelings. I guess you did help prove a point though.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Truly a baffling comment. The other person was just saying that since it wasn’t proven it technically was just an accusation and you threw a shitfit about that.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I suppose the irony of using the same tactics the Rapist in Chief uses is lost on you. Please keep up the circle jerk, it is pretty amusing watching you at this point.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            The former POTUS has been in thousands of court cases. He is one of the most litigious individuals of all time. His entire adult life has been in the courtroom using technicalities to avoid responsibility.

            When someone defends him on a technicality that is the very definition of irony. OP was wrong to do this so they got some ridicule. Rightfully so.

            The situation itself is so absurd it is at times hard to comprehend. For instance, just because it has not or cannot be proven in courtroom beyond a shadow of a doubt does not mean it didn’t happen.

            So OP can take their smugness about being technically correct and stick it.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Right. But the person said it wasn’t an accusation because Trump lost the lawsuit. And that’s something that’s just wrong. It’s not a technicality or even a defence to point out such an error, they were just wrong about him losing the case. Someone pointing out a big factual error shouldn’t be cause for this sort of shitfit, if you ask me.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                No one did and your faux outrage is just as bullshit as you are. You don’t know the difference between a shitfit and sarcasm so pardon me if I don’t trust your reading comprehension.

                You don’t have any skin in this game, you have never been raped nor do you have daughters. Just another rape apologist pretending to be a bro.

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Technically not an accusation, Trump lost the lawsuit to Jane Doe Link to comment

                  From the article, right below the title

                  The anonymous plaintiff dropped her lawsuit against Trump (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation)

                  Wikipedia:

                  A lawsuit filed in California in April 2016 accused Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of forcibly raping three 12 and 13-year-old girls at underage sex parties at Epstein’s Manhattan residence in 1994. The case was dismissed the following month. A second version of the lawsuit was filed in New York in June by a Jane Doe claiming to have been raped by the pair at four 1994 parties when she was 13 years old. It was withdrawn in October as the plaintiff said she had received death threats. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations#Jane_Doe_(1994))

                  You don’t have to trust my reading comprehension since the comment and the links are right there. Surely you trust your own comprehension.

                  You don’t have any skin in this game, you have never been raped nor do you have daughters. Just another rape apologist pretending to be a bro.

                  It’s not rape apologia to say that Trump didn’t lose the case. Unless you are accusing Vox (and Wikipedia) of rape apologia.

                  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I never even disputed that. Yes, you are incapable of reading comprehension. You can’t read the room and often miss the point. It is painfully obvious.