• maximalian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The new vaccines generate lots of profits for the pharma. Therefore, what incentives will ALWAYS there be for the owners and creators of the vaccines? Not vacciness in general, but SOME vacciness, against SOME diseases-19.

    Would or could they, the pharma, ever reveal that some vaccines, especially their own, especially the newest ones, may be harmful to people in any way? That they could cause delayed negatives consequences and side-effects?

    Therefore, who, or ironically WHO, has all the incesitves to always try to prove that all the negative data about the newest vaccines is a lie? And “in fact, it’s getting worse”. Yeah, worse for the those manufacture the vacciness and try to jab people like pigs :)

    This may not prove that they, the vaccines, are or may be indeed harmful. Or not that all of them, for all people, not against all the viruses. Nonetheless, the incentive of hidding the truth about this exists and for one side only.

    • Revonult@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think you should watch this video. The orgional paper linking vaccines to autism was specifically made to further the authors ambition. He lied and withheld or manipulated data in order to support his work.

      Drug companies go through extensive trials before bringing vaccines to the market. So who do you believe? Extensive peer reviewed studies or one guy clearly furthering his own agenda?

      https://youtu.be/8BIcAZxFfrc?si=3gN3mTnJA3aVaHBP

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The new vaccines

      Retvrn To Tradition! Only get the flu shot from 10 years ago. Don’t get the one that’s been selected against the current flu strain.

      Therefore, who, or ironically WHO, has all the incesitves to always try to prove that all the negative data about the newest vaccines is a lie?

      Or maybe they have an incentive to use proven health care technologies that deliver effective treatment, because epidemics are bad for everyone?