• rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Dunno, looking at Ursula von der Leyen and her style in clothing, Dolores Umbridge comes to mind instantaneously, and that seems to be the right impression.

    Or a few other known politicians, one looks like a provincial mafia boss and behaves like that, relatively good things included, and that seems right. Another looks like a kid who tortured animals in their childhood and grew up without picking up any skills outside of that general direction, and that seems right. There’s one who looks like an assassin turned alcoholic whose current job is to say and sign whatever he’s given, and that seems right. There’s one who looks like a coward who stole a chair and is now terribly afraid of losing it, and that is about right.

    If you mean black skin + senior age, then yeah.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s called the Texas sharpshooter fallacy. focussing on proof that you’re right at using a false equivalent. In this case appearance = personality.

      You’re counting the ones you’ve so called ‘gotten right’ because people who are negative are drawn to the negative and count only the negatives to support their theories. The ones you claim to have gotten right seem wrong btw. An assassin isn’t the same as an alcoholic. One is an intentional line of work. The other is a disease. That is inception level of more than one false equivalence there.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think you should re-read your own comment and look for fallacies there, TBH.

        Which is a false equivalent for Hollywood stereotypes and which isn’t here is about me guessing what the author meant. Guessing because they are not sufficiently specific. If you have a better source, like reading minds or contacting God, let me know.

        “Seem wrong” - OK.

        An assassin can be an alcoholic. Nobody made a 1-to-1 association.

        This comment isn’t hostile, but you didn’t find any fallacies.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          And here you are attempting to read minds yourself. You literally listed assassin for an alcoholic and made that line all on your own. So yeah, it is fallacy. That is Exactly false attribute fallacy.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You literally listed assassin for an alcoholic and made that line all on your own.

            English is not my first language. That said, I think you’ve read “assassin turned alcoholic” wrong for a few times by now.

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Sigh. How does saying that a certain assassin has turned alcoholic make a one-to-one association between assassin and alcoholic?

                Also technically “assassin” is a bastardization of “hashshasheen” or something meaning “hashish smokers”, which was a slur for members of Nizari-Ismaili sect, which is funny in the context of your claim.

    • Arbic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Could you help me out and tell me the names to your descriptions? I’m curious

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        These were Erdogan, Aliyev, Putin and Pashinyan in the same order.

        I only read news for Armenia-related stuff, TBH.