• HWK_290@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    True, but the Biden administration is definitely using the debate to put forward their own talking points (“watch it jack, we’re bringing roe back,” a new plan to cap student loan debt, new climate investments) so it’s not like we’re getting no taste of what the administration’s priorities will be in the next 4 years

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but the Biden administration is definitely using the debate to put forward their own talking points (“watch it jack, we’re bringing roe back,” a new plan to cap student loan debt, new climate investments) so it’s not like we’re getting no taste of what the administration’s priorities will be in the next 4 years

      Good, and they should be. I’d like to see some Democratic with the candidates who obviously won’t be getting the nod, simply because its an opportunity to hold people accountable. How about the failure by the Biden administration on student loans? How about we have some debate questions about the supreme court and how its basically been captured by the conservative movement, and apparently, open to bribery? We have so few opportunities to actually engage in politics. We can’t give up the debates simply because of decorum or that the contenders won’t win. Its literally the only time we ever get the chance to drive the party in the direction of the will of the people.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is Biden supposed to do about the Supreme Court except nominate new justices? The problem is that you need Congress to do something.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lets here what he proposes as a solution. Its his answer to have not mine, and as President, he sure as fucking shit better have a plan, or he’s not qualified for the job. The argument here is in support of debates. Without debates, we don’t get answers to these kinds of questions.

          I sure as shit want to know what Biden’s plan is to deal with a congress that wont play ball. He needs to have one.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lets here what he proposes as a solution. Its his answer to have not mine

            It isn’t his job, unless you make the Supreme Court a Presidential appointment alone and that they can fire justices on their own whim.

            The power to deal with a corrupt Supreme Court has been clearly vested in Congress, not the President.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It isn’t his job, unless you make the Supreme Court a Presidential appointment alone and that they can fire justices on their own whim.

              It sure as fuck is the Presidents job to navigate the halls of power and deliver on things they campaign on.

              • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                To a point, but the President has not been given the power to be a dictator.

                If the President’s agenda doesn’t get past Congress, what is the President supposed to do? Do you expect the President to start arresting members of Congress until the Presidents’ bills get passed?

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  To a point, but the President has not been given the power to be a dictator.

                  No one is asking them to be, but if you don’t understand that the ability to get an agenda past Congress is there job, I don’t know what to tell you. The job of a President isn’t to accept defeat for their constituents, is to find a way through.

                  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That isn’t the President’s job to wrangle Congress. Perception over time has made people think that, but the Presidency was never set to lead the legislative branch. If that were the case, the President would be more like a Prime Minister in other countries.