• Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is the real discussion piece. We either always have Friday the 13th or we never do again.

      I’m with you for always Friday the 13th.

      Plus, never having one again just feels wrong.

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    As a software dev who has lost weeks of his life dealing with timezones, leap days, daylight savings time, date math and other associated nonsense I fully support this being the way the world is. I don’t want to go through the transition to get there though

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bad news: this has nothing to do with timezones, leap days nor daylight saving time. Honestly, leap days would be worse because they wouldn’t be part of the 7 day week

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s accounted for just like any other leap year, add it to the end of a month as a universal holiday. Most calendar models make it July 29. It’s also worth noting that this is actually 364 days, and a single day at the end of the year is a universal holiday.

        Edit: I think leap years should be at the end of the year too for simplicity.

        • Flipper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That would just be new year. I’ve already have a list ready for how to name all the months, so we don’t fuck it up like September being the 9. Month again.

        • lugal@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Which breaks “day of week = day modulo 7” if every month starts on Monday and not every month has the same number of days

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Look, short of changing Earth’s orbit, something’s not gonna line up no matter what you do. Extra-weekly days are as good a compromise as any in my book.

          • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            In this scheme, new years day and leap days are not any day of the week or part of any month. They exist outside of the regular calendar as obvious and explicit resets to the remainder problem.

            • lugal@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              My point exactly. So the programmer who commented above me is wrong in saying it makes it easier for them

              • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                No, still easier. They are still part of the year, so you can just count them, and the logic is still easier than the mess we currently have. If you really feel the need to you can call new years day the zeroth day in the zeroth month, the day of the week is Holiday, and periodically the zeroth month has one extra Holiday.

                • lugal@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Computers store the date as “days after January 1st 1970”. So you have a huge number, divide it with 7 and get the day of the week. If there are days that don’t belong to any week, you have to calculate January 1st of that year and substrate it in addition to the steps above. I don’t say it’s not manageable, but it’s not easier

            • lugal@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              My point exactly. So the programmer who commented above me is wrong in saying it makes it easier for them

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Developers are the only people against DST changes, just because of how complex it will get. Dear God cities are removing DST! Cities! It means I need to know if you are in or out of a city to know if you need to be shown daylight or standard time!

      Just please do it nationally yes or no

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That… still requires knowing which time zone to display. It doesn’t remove the requirement at all.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              and who implements localtime? You realize these functions call down to the system, and the system is very much ALSO written and maintained by coders…

              The point is SOMEONE actually does have to implement it and maintain it.

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    This reminds me of a fantasy series I like, where the world still has 365 day, but every month is 30 days long, and the remaining 5 days are separate holidays for the solstices, equinoxes, and new years.

    Also, when are we going to do 10hrs/day, 100 min/hr and 100s/min?

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t decimalize time, instead dozenalize our numbers! Twelve is such a better building block than ten. Pretty much all math becomes way easier using dozenal numbers instead of decimal ones.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I like this better because if you have to do one holiday outside of the calendar then why not 5 and the equinoxes and solsctices divide it up perfectly. Then everything else is nice and even. I assume weeks were six days long as that is how I always thought of it. 5 six day weeks.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also, when are we going to do 10hrs/day, 100 min/hr and 100s/min?

      This is how you collectively give the entire scientific community a simultaneous aneurysm. The amount of work needed to convert measurements based on our current seconds/minutes/hours to your “metric” seconds/minutes/hours would be astronomical.

      Also, pretty much everyone already agrees on the current system of time, so why change it? It would just create another metric/imperial or F/C divide and cause conversion mistakes.

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    France tried such calendar in 1789 and 1871. We lost it when Jules Ferry executed all the communalists in Paris. Some people in France still use those calendars to show their support to revolutionary ideas

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can we do something about October being the 10th month of the year. It’s stupid and annoying.

      • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That’s a common misconception. For the Romans, the year used to start with March and only have ten months. January and February weren’t even named, it was just the time between harvest and the new year. Several calendar changes followed over the centuries. Adding two months (January and February). Moving the new year to January, which made September-December no longer 7-10. Adding random one-off months to realign with the seasons. And a couple different tries at leap days, among other things.

        This gives a quick overview.

        Edit 2: To clarify, the above changes were all made by the Romans, they only started with a ten month calendar.

        Edit: The fifth and sixth months were originally named Quintilis and Sextilis before they were changed to July and August.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I suppose we could fix it by moving the start of the year to March 1st. Start of spring makes more sense for the new year anyway.

    • Typhoonigator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      This meme already ignores the fact that it’s only produced a calendar of 364 days.

      Most proposed versions I’ve seen of this calendar have New Year’s Day as a standalone holiday, so the leap day presumably tacks on to that every 4 years?

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Currently, everyone in the world agrees about the days of the week (correct me if I’m wrong). If it’s Monday in France it’s Monday in Finland, besides a few hours due to timezones. But if a particular society adopts this system you describe, or any system under which every year starts on a particular day of the week and is solar aligned, that necessitates having an incomplete week and losing that sync with the entire rest of the world.

        A possible solution is to only use leap weeks. So every year has 364 days, but every 6 years or so (spare me the exact calculation) you track on a leap week to realign with the solar cycle. This is similar to the leap month in the Hebrew calendar - months follow the moon so a leap month is the smallest unit possible to tweak the length of a year.

        • Tnaeriv@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You’re wrong. For example: some of the country of Kiribati (UTC +14) will never be in the same day of the week as Hawaii (UTC -10).

          • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Right, I forgot about that edge case… But at least they agree about a particular date’s day of the week, don’t they? And they’re consistently one day off. This proposed system would be inconsistently off, sometimes in sync and sometimes 3 days off.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    But how would the corporate world divide the 13 month year into quarters? Don’t you know what that’ll do to the bottom line?! Think of the poor shareholders! /s

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    A lunar day is 27.3 days and a solar cycle is 29 and change. So we’d be just off the lunar cycles. Like when you’re sitting waiting for a turn lane signal to change and the person in front of you has a blinker that’s just a tiny bit slower than yours.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ah yes, decimalized time. An idea so bad even the French said no, just no after trying it.

  • bobbytables@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hate the idea of metric time (for a lot of use cases metric is still awesome).

    12 and 60 can be easily divided by 2, 3, 4, 6. 60 also by 5 and 10. Even for 8 it’s still kind of easy.

    For 10 or 100 division is easy for 2, 5 and 10 and okay-ish for 4.

    The 12/60 (and 360 degrees of a circle) are such an elegant system!

      • bobbytables@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        AFAIK the system goes back to the old Babylonians who had a base-60 system subdivided into 5 times 12. 5 times 12 could easily be counted using your thumb to count the 12 knuckles on the other fingers and the 5 fingers of the other hand.

        I mean, how amazing is counting like that! I only learned to count to 10 with my fingers. I love the base-10 for its simplicity but base-60, subbase-12 is the shit :D

  • Silverchase@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    We should divide the year into four suits — one for each season. Each suit is thirteen weeks long, numbered ace to king. Sometimes we have a Joker day.

    • skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ah yes, the Balatro calendar. I play a King of Diamonds, which triples the number of days in June and removes October.

  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    In preparation for the upcoming Bell Riots, WWIII, Eugenics Wars, First Contact, Battle of Wolf 359, and Dominion Wars, I say we stop beating around the bush and adopt the Bajoran 26 hour day.