• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh lordy.

    So the dehumanizing term should be used because it’s not the reason people are dehumanizing the people.

    Are you can fan of racial slurs by chance? Because “it’s just an accurate word for black people” is something racists say about certain words as well.

    What does litter have to do with jay walking.

    What does leaving the country have to do with jay walking?…

    I’m simply using your own flawed logic. And you’re proving my point.

    How exactly is rectifying the law broken a harsher punishment? How would it make any sense to just charge them a fine and let them be on their way? That’s like saying you should just fine someone littering and then ignore the fact that they are continuing to actively litter.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      So the dehumanizing term

      It’s not a dehumanizing term. That’s ridiculous.

      What does leaving the country have to do with jay walking?…

      Nothing. Is your brain mushy?

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Weird, because this was you up the chain a little:

        Has anybody ever been removed from a country when they’ve been caught jay walking?

        So which is it?

        It’s not a dehumanizing term. That’s ridiculous.

        The majority of the country disagrees.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          So which is it?

          It’s the same consistent thing: Jaywalking is not punished as severely as illegal immigration, because it’s not on the same “level”.

          The majority of the country disagrees.

          Which country, because definitely not the USA.