Trump deserved to lose on all these points, and the Colorado Supreme Court correctly rejected his arguments on them. But I think he did have a plausible argument on the issue of whether his involvement in the Jan. 6 attack was extensive enough to qualify as “engaging” in insurrection. At the very least, he had a better argument there than on self-execution. The Court’s resolution of the latter issue is based on badly flawed reasoning and relies heavily on dubious policy arguments invoking the overblown danger of a “patchwork” of conflicting state resolutions of Section 3 issues. The Court’s venture into policy was also indefensibly one-sided, failing to consider the practical dangers of effectively neutering Section 3 with respect to candidates for federal office and holders of such positions.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah that’s the problem, people don’t fully understand the issue and feel the need to weigh in on it.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Tbh I conflated that car with the concept of corporate personhood as that was the first time I heard of the concept.