• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Removed under rule 5, you’re free to attack their content, but not them personally.

    “Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”

        • Otakulad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Fine, I accept that, but what exactly did I say that caused the post to be removed? All I said was he was probably a paid posted. How is that not being civil?

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            You can see your modlog here:

            https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&userId=1641922

            “This poster is a paid Russian sympathizer. Baby account, bad English, and only posted in posts regarding this topic.”

            Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). **It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.**Engage in good-faith and with respect!

            Attacking other users, which you did three times in one comment, is not allowed.

            • Otakulad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, no. Your interpretation is incorrect in my opinion.

              Yes, it was a baby account. Only 6 hours old. The icon next to their name is a baby. How can you punish me for something the site does as well?

              Also, the English the person used did not sound like it was English as a first language.

              Lastly, let’s take a look at your verbiage.

              Perjorative: expressing contempt or disapproval

              Calling a person a paid Russian sympathizer does not meet this definition. He was acting as if Russia is the victim in this story. I was saying what he was.

              I would appreciate if when reports are made, they are actually looked at and not blindly removed.

                  • Otakulad@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    No, it’s not. Calling out what someone is does not meet the definition. Additionally, you said I did three things in my comment, most of which were false.