• Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Since reading is hard:

    It’s at least in part Russian propaganda. They don’t want people to vote for Trump, they do want democratic voters to not vote at all, which will help Trump get elected.

    Way to ignore the entire point of the person you responded to.

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Way to ignore the entire point of the person you responded to.

      i’m not ignoring it. i’m challenging it.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sorry, I wasn’t aware that you were “challenging it” by ignoring the actual point and making up something else to respond to. My mistake, I’ll have to learn alternative definitions for words.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sorry, I wasn’t aware that you were “challenging it” by ignoring the actual poin

          the actual point is that they claimed there is a russian campaign to help trump’s performance in november on the basis of biden’s support for genocide. there is no evidence for this.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            Just like there was no evidence during the 2016 or 2020 campaigns, but surely they’ve changed this election. If only there were any evidence of it happening this round, I’m sure you’d change your mind.

            I mean, could you imagine if they had tried to drum up charges against the president’s family by getting an asset to be believed as a credible witness in a case against his family? Or if they were putting out deep fakes to make people think Biden said something he never did?

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              Just like there was no evidence during the 2016 or 2020 campaigns, but surely they’ve changed this election

              this is innuendo. there is a specific claim being made about people who are objecting to joe’s genocide, and that claim simply isn’t supported by any evidence. your innuendo is slander.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                Thanks for proving you’re a bad faith actor, you clearly didn’t even bother to read even a single link I posted that showed evidence.

                Bye friend, I’m not dealing with your goalpost moving bs any longer

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Thanks for proving you’re a bad faith actor

                  your links were provided above. your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              could you imagine if they had tried to drum up charges against the president’s family by getting an asset to be believed as a credible witness in a case against his family? Or if they were putting out deep fakes to make people think Biden said something he never did?

              that’s not the claim that’s being made or to which i’m objecting. i’m objecting to the characterization of leftists as russian propagandists.