Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.

  • BaskinRobbins@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s obvious you’ve never lived in the hood lol. Poor income areas usually have the highest crime and often little to no police presence.

    • Zoot@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’ve lived in the hood. BRANDISHING which is what this law for, would have you shot dead. Get the fuck outta here.

      Does it say I need insurance to own a shotgun, that is kept in my home? Because thats what I’d be using if I lived in the hood and felt afraid in my home

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Many people who conceal carry and actually train with their firearms can draw and fire in about 1.5 seconds. That is fast enough that you won’t be shot dead in a lot of situations.

        Brandishing is dumb. If someone is going to draw their firearm, it should only ever be in a life or death situation, and they should be justified in using it immediately.

        Open carry is also just a bad idea everywhere, not just the hood.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          1.5 seconds or not, now everyone knows you own a gun. A gun will never improve a situation.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You are right that guns rarely improve a situation, but sometimes we have to deal with the fact that we live in a cruel world where a lot of people carry guns and are desperate enough to use them on people.

            Personally, if I was being robbed and was conceal carrying, I would do everything I could to not escalate the situation. I would just slowly give them my stuff. But if I am trapped in a building with a mass shooter or something, I would rather try to defend my family and myself rather than just waiting to be executed.

            I respect your viewpoint on it, though.

            • Zoot@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t believe, and also hope for your own sake, that a situation never arises where you need one. You have every right to be able to do so. In fact, this bill only makes it so in the event something goes wrong; insurance has got you covered.

              • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                I sincerely appreciate the well wishes. I hope a situation never arises where I need one, either, and I kind of wish the world and our country wasn’t the way it is, but here we are. I also think this bill is not a terrible idea at all, maybe just needs to be ironed out a bit to consider low income people somehow.

                I hope you have a great day, and wish you the best in life.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Open carrying in the hood is a great way to get shot. Being open about your weapons in the hood is a great way to get robbed.

          Semantics.

          If it came to you having to use your weapon in the first place, then you’re already dead. This bill is a good first step in curbing our rampant gun issues.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Lol reread the article, this is for carrying, brandishing is what is known as a “criminal offense” and is “not covered by such liability insurance.” You want “insurance” against your literal crimes get a lawyer on retainer, but I know you’re just conflating carrying concealed, laugably, or open, with brandishing, which by all definitions involved particularly the legal (i.e important) ones, they are not the same thing.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          My comment was directed at the person claiming having a gun in the hood is a necessity and that this bill stops them from that.

          I said brandishing because if you have a gun in the hood, whether or not its tucked in your shorts, holstered and concealed as is legal, or hanging from your balls out in the open, its a bad fucking idea.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            My comment was directed at the person claiming having a gun in the hood is a necessity and that this bill stops them from that.

            Right, but you were the only person in the entire thread to mention brandishing, the comment you replied to is in relation to carrying, open or concealed, as is the article, and the law itself that we’re discussing, keep up buddy. Also:

            I’ve lived in the hood. BRANDISHING which is what this law for, would have you shot dead. Get the fuck outta here.

            Your comment was directed at him, but about this law, which is what I’m correcting you on.

            The hood being underpoliced and over-crimed necessitates the occasional defense of oneself, and the carrying required to do so. You can feel whatever way you want to about that, but sometimes it does have to happen, and does happen, regularly.

      • BaskinRobbins@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I never said anything about brandishing. I was responding to the above comment saying poor people don’t need to buy a gun.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          No one needs a gun, but another barrier to entry is a plus in my book.