• OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    The fact remains that the source for this claim is bro trust me. Nobody should care who I trust. But I’m sure most people can see that “bro trust me” is completely useless. I will believe it when I see evidence

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nobody should believe anything because of a “bro trust me” and if you do you have a serious problem. I know nobody cares if I believe it, I am not stupid

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Denual is a refuge for weak arguments. Obviously the the countries that control fund8ng are not in denial.

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Bruh, “above our paygrade” is a prime example of denial, deflection, and appeal to authority.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              9 months ago

              Another way of saying I do not have the information that the various countries have is not denial.

          • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Scepticism in the face of a lack of evidence, especially for a claim from one side involved in a war, is not only a good idea but necessary. Would you just believe a Russian claim about Ukranian schools, no questions asked?

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Yeah, or about Russia invading Ukraine! Wait.

              If you look at documents at the time, intelligence agencies said there was a possibility he had WMDs, but there was no conclusive evidence nor assurances.

              The Bush Administration lied to Congress and said we knew for sure they had them.

              Edit: It’s good to have healthy skepticism – it hasn’t escaped my notice that the majority of evidence behind this claim is coming from Israel. I don’t think it’s wise to deem it automatically false however, and pulling funding is premature. There should however be a serious internal investigation. And if they already have smoking guns, the UN should release them in the interest of transparency.

              Apologies for starting out my comment as a bit of a jackass.