Michael and Catherine Burke allege that the state’s Department of Children and Families discriminated against them for their Catholic viewpoints.

  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Part of being a foster parent is agreeing to respect the child’s situation, religious views, sexual orientation, etc. If I tell the state that I’m not going to take a kid to church if they’re religious, I’m not getting approved. If I tell the state I’m going to teach potentially gay children that being gay is wrong, I’m not getting approved.

  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A social worker’s report attached to the complaint said the couple was asked how they would feel if a child in their care identified as LGBTQ or struggled with their gender identity. Kitty Burke responded by saying “let’s take the T out of it” and called gender-affirming care “chemical castration,” according to the report. She also said, “I’m going to love you the same,” but that the child “would need to live a chaste life.” Both Kitty and Michael Burke expressed hesitation around using a transgender or nonbinary person’s preferred pronouns, the social worker’s report noted.

    Michael Burke told the social worker he’d been to gay weddings and would “likely attend” his child’s wedding if they were LGBTQ, according to the report, and the couple said they wouldn’t kick a child out of their home for being LGBTQ or subject them to conversion therapy.

    Following the interview, the social worker issued an “approval with conditions, specifically around religion and LGBTQIA++ related issues.” Their application was later denied by the department’s Licensing Review Team, the complaint states.

    “If you give me an LGBTQ kid, I’m going to be a horrible parent. Wait, why did you deny my parenting application? This is discrimination!”

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if I need to provide bonifides for being queer positive and not asking in bad faith, but why are there two pluses in that? It just makes me think of C++ and seems… jokey.

      • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s why I generally prefer “queer”. Plus, it’s not an acronym, and reclaiming words is always good!

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many just say queer. Or LGBT. Companies and news organizations can’t really settle on one thing to call us. Imo, LGBT+ gets the point across without being excessive.

  • lem_dart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The nerve of people to cry they were discriminated against for their views as if their views weren’t the original discriminator… It’s just mind boggling.

  • fear@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re asking the court to get rid of that discriminatory denial so that they will not be barred from fostering or adopting children in the future, in Massachusetts or elsewhere.

    Stop discriminating against our discrimination! Thanks for the good laugh, Michael and Catherine Burke.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This got me to open the article again and search for what this may reference. I didn’t see anything in particular about him being worse than her. Did I miss it? I admit that I mostly scanned and didn’t read comprehensively because I don’t care about these people and their bullshit views. Fuck anyone who says “Let’s take the T out.”

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why conservatives should not be permitted to be foster parents. Child abuse is a foundational principle of conservatism.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree no child should be placed in a home that would endanger them, but why is this even news? Couple needs to grow a pair and either change their views or just not adopt/foster. Go back to church or golf or whatever. Quit bothering the legal system. Perhaps they could volunteer for an LGBTQ organization and learn why “the T” doesn’t make anyone different or lesser.

    • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are even dozens of Christian adoption and fostering agencies that will completely ignore any and all criminal histories if you are godly enough. In fact, being as hypocritical as possible seems to be a selling point for these agencies. If you preach God’s love but have smashed a racists face into the concrete and lost your job over it and then shot your dog in the street while your wife defrauds the public and scams vulnerable people to the point of being sued by the state of Texas then you are exactly who they are looking to foster.

      Edit: apologies, my fat fingers bungled it: if you are a racist who smashes black people’s faces into the concrete

  • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holy shit. The foster system standing up for kids. Now there’s something that sadly doesn’t happen very often. I hope this couple get what they deserve

  • SolNine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good, no child should be placed with parents who may discriminate against them for their natural state of being.

  • HellAwaits@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    lol those two shouldn’t be near any kids. They’ll just be control freaks and make their kid exactly what they wanted to avoid.

    Stop trying to control every aspect of children lives, conservatives.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Views”, meaning they’ll abandon their child if they ever come out or acknowledge that LGBTQ people exist…

  • tym@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like it’s God’s plan for them to stay the fuck away from children. First sensible thing that asshat’s done.